Women Who Voted for Trump "The question is whether or not a
factual statement such as this should
or should not be interpreted as divisive
or racist (which is what many are saying).
This is where issues of privilege come into play."
photo shown here,taken at the Women’s March, is causing quite a
bit of discussion on social media. At issue, for many, is the message
on the poster. Some commentators have called this woman a racist.
Others feel that her message is inaccurate, not factual, or out of
photo was brought to my attention in a private Facebook group I
belong to called “Calling
‘In’ White Women“. The group was created after
Trump was elected to provide a space where women could talk about and
gain a better understanding ofthe huge disparity between the way that
women of color voted and white women voted in this last presidential
election—especially when one considers that the candidate who
got the most votes from white women has openly admitted to engaging
in sexual assault against women (likely white women).
majority of the women in the group are white progressives trying to
bridge the racial divide. They’ve all signed up for a nine-week
course exploring the disconnect between white women and women of
color. Those of you who know that I am black might be asking yourself
why I’m in the group. I’m there because I taught one of
take on the photo is that the message is factual. I think it caused a
stir for a few reasons. One is that the majority of the protesters at
the march are white but the woman holding the sign is black. I
suspect that some sense she is breaching one of our many unspoken but
closely adhered to rules—she is bringing race into the fray at
a women’s rally. Aren’t all women equally oppressed –
some might ask. But this women clearly wants to “Call Out”
white women and therein lies the issue.
and author Allan G. Johnson talks about the taboo of calling
something what it is and when that taboo is most likely to be
invoked. He says this issue often comes into play when a group from a
lower social rank calls into account the negative behavior of a
the case of the photograph at the women’s march, the reality is
that when you count just the women who voted for Trump, more than 80%
of them are white. It is therefore reasonable to assert that when
speaking of the women who voted for Trump, as this woman is doing, it
is perfectly factual to state that white women voted for Trump. It is
beyond dispute that white women, more than any other group of women,
got Trump elected. So why did this photograph cause so much chatter
in social media?
question is whether or not a factual statement such as this should or
should not be interpreted as divisive or racist (which is what many
are saying). This is where issues of privilege come into play.
to Johnson, one of the characteristics of white privilege is that
white people have the luxury of removing themselves from racial
issues. Discussions of race or racism are generally relegated to
internal discussions preferably had by all the other racial groups.
Whites generally don’t get into the racial thing. In other
words, the others have to deal with race. Whites have the privilege
of not being racialized. In the United States it’s as if
they’re seen as the default humans. I have had white friends
tell me that they feel that they are generic as if whiteness itself
is devoid of unique characteristics. In fact, the study of whiteness
relatively new. Millennials reading this will likely know the term
but many white boomers have no idea what it means.
the rules of this game remain unspoken, most of us, regardless of
race, know the score. We generally don’t mention the word
“white” even when we are talking specifically about white
people. This is particularly true when the speaker or writer is also
an example. A frequent LA Progressive writer who happens to be a
white man recently submitted an article about the attempts to pass
healthcare legislation in the past. Speaking of the past failed
attempts, he said, “But lawmakers from the South blocked the
measure, because their constituents were afraid they would have to
share doctors and medical facilities with racial minorities.”
contacted him to get clarity because I knew, based on my
understanding of history, that the lawmakers “constituents”
he referred to were white. Their whiteness is germane to the story.
In fact, the story only makes sense when the word “white”
is added to modify “constituents”. When I mentioned this
to him, he agreed so I edited the piece to include the constituents’
race. I could offer many more examples of this type of racial
omission. One thing that is striking is that the word “white”
is regularly omitted but the race of everyone else is commonly
pointed out even when their race is not germane to the story.
of the consequences of the frequent avoidance of calling out “white”
is that when it is actually spoken, it can have a jarring affect—can
even sound harsh. I suspect that many of the white people who were
offended by the poster were affected in this way. Which could be one
of the issues at hand that caused such a stir with the photo.
my experience, just calling a white woman a “white woman”
can usher in feelings of awkwardness, resentment and even
fear—especially when it is a black woman who is calling the
white woman white. As a nation, we are racially fractured but we are
so ill at ease with race talk.
here’s the problem. Racism, race, racial issues, race talk —
all of this must be dealt with if we are to mount a serious united
front to tackle bigger issues like war, climate change, and a whole
host of other things. As a nation, our racial illiteracy is crippling
our ability to develop strong coalitions, to have empathy for each
other’s issues or to see how our actions can maintain systems
of privilege even when we’re unaware of our role in it.
no, I do not believe that the message in the image is racist or even
offensive. I think it’s time for all of us to learn a lot more
about intersectionality—thank you Professor Kimberle Crenshaw
(she coined the term)! You can learn more about intersectionality by
clicking the video below. And if you like this article, PLEASE SHARE.
Thanks in advance.
are some links to resources with additional information on this
BlackCommentator.comEditorial Board member and Columnist,Sharon Kyle, JD, is the Co-Founder and Publisher of theLA Progressivean
online social justice magazine. With her husband Dick, she publishes
several other print and online newsletters on political and social
justice issues. In addition to her work with the LA Progressive, Ms.
Kyle holds aJurisDoctorate,
is an adjunct professor at Peoples College of Law in Los Angeles, and
sits on the board of the ACLU Pasadena/Foothills Chapter and the
Progressive Caucus of the California Democratic Party.Clickhereto contact the LA Progressive and Ms. Kyle.