Pretrial incarceration is expensive for society and can destroy lives, but there are safe, humane, cost-effective alternatives.
The
principle of innocent until proven guilty is at the heart of our
justice system, and yet in the United States today, 61 percent of
people in jails have not been convicted.[1]
Although their innocence or guilt has not yet been established, men and
women may spend months or even years behind bars awaiting trial—at a
cost to the nation of $9 billion annually.[2] Furthermore, three-fourths of these individuals are charged with nonviolent crimes, including minor drug offenses.[3]
Some may not be eligible for pretrial release (parole violators, for
instance). But often they are imprisoned because they are unable to pay
even the comparatively modest sums set as bail for crimes such as drug
possession.
What It Means for the Poor
The bail system affects the poor disproportionately: people trying to
cobble together a living from several part-time, minimum-wage jobs may
be unable to come up with even $200 bail to secure release, whereas the
more well-off, accused of a more serious crime, may go free because
they can afford to pay their bail. (In Massachusetts, the case of Jared
Remy, is illustrative. The son of sports broadcaster Jerry Remy, he was
repeatedly arrested for assault and easily paid bail whenever it was
set. Eventually he pled guilty to murdering a former girlfriend.[4])
Proposed Legislation in Massachusetts
Tom Sannicandro
Massachusetts House of Representatives
As
of this writing, Senator Ken Donnelly and I have filed legislation to
reform the pretrial and bail system by shifting from a wealth-based to
a risk-based system. HD3156/SD1491 creates a uniform bail process that
will keep pretrial detention from being based solely on a person's
inability to pay cash bail.
The bill has four main features:
-
it requires the judicial officer to consult a risk-assessment tool
designed to predict the likelihood of a defendant returning to court;
- it
creates a Pretrial Services Division that would prepare the risk
assessment for each defendant and be responsible for any necessary
supervision of pretrial defendants;
- it sets a
statutory preference against cash bail, encouraging release and use of
other evidence-based conditions and access to services that are more
reliable than cash bail in ensuring a defendant's presence at court; and
- it initiates bail data collection and analysis.
The
legal outcomes for those who await trial behind bars are much worse
than the outcomes for those who don't. Using data from Kentucky, one
study found that, controlling for factors such as prior criminal
history or current charge, pretrial detainees are four times more
likely to be sentenced to jail and three times more likely to be
sentenced to prison—and their sentences are longer.[5]
Those
who are found not guilty, meanwhile, may discover that their pretrial
incarceration has cost them their job, their apartment, and even
custody of their children. The Wellesley Center for Women reported that
in 2012 in Massachusetts, 5,300 children were affected by their
mothers' pretrial detentions in the Framingham women's prison. Over the
course of a year, thousands more women are held pretrial in county
jails, and like those in Framingham, the majority are charged with
nonviolent offenses.[6]
"When
women are incarcerated, whether in MCI-Framingham or in another
facility, their children become collateral captives shuffled among
relatives or foster care situations. These children in turn are at
elevated risks of abuse, high levels of use of [prescribed] psychiatric
medication, and ultimately involvement in the juvenile correctional
system," reports Susan Sered, a professor of sociology at Suffolk
University.[7]
The cost to the commonwealth is high, too. A woman held in jail for two
months because she is unable to meet bail costs Massachusetts taxpayers
a minimum of $7,000, according to the Massachusetts Pretrial Working
Group.[8]
(In 2012, the average length of pretrial detention in MCI-Framingham
was 77 days. The average length of pretrial detention in the Women's
Correctional Center in Chicopee, Massachusetts, for that year was 60
days.[9])
Alternatives
Alternatives exist. Maine saves millions of dollars annually by working
with Maine Pretrial Services, a nonprofit organization that assesses
the risk of a charged person failing to appear for a court date. People
who pass the assessment are released pending their court date and are
supervised by Pretrial Services caseworkers.
The
assessment considers factors such as past criminal history, mental
health, presence or absence of substance abuse, employment history, and
prior history of failing to appear. As a result of the work of Pretrial
Services, Maine's jails are less crowded, saving the state money. In
2013, Capt. Marsha Alexander, Kennebec County jail administrator,
estimated the savings from having fewer prisoners at approximately $2
million. The county pays $130,000 for Maine Pretrial Services
assistance.[10] Not all counties in Maine make use of the nonprofit, however, and advocates would like to see its role expanded.
The
District of Columbia's pretrial program, run by the Pretrial Services
Agency, reports impressive statistics. About 85 percent of all those
arrested are released prior to their court date, approximately 88
percent of those released return to court, and less than 1 percent are
rearrested for a violent crime. "Most significantly, and unique in the
entire nation, the District accomplishes this without using money
bonds. Money bonds that detain people are illegal in Washington, DC,"
says Clifford Keenan, the agency's director.[11]
Not
only does pretrial release save the government money and improve
outcomes for people accused of crimes, it is also associated with a
reduction in crime. Kentucky, another state with a pretrial release
program, reported a 4 percent drop in the crime rate at the same time
the number of people released into supervision pretrial increased.
The
Pretrial Working Group would like to bring those benefits to
Massachusetts. The organization is focused on developing and
implementing pretrial services throughout the commonwealth and raising
awareness about the need to invest in alternatives to incarceration.
Lois Ahrens, a cofounder of the Pretrial Working Group and founder of
the Real Cost of Prisons Project, says, "Steps to see these significant
changes realized include educating legislators, judges, prosecutors and
defense attorneys, and the public about proven alternatives to bail
already in use around the country, and urging support for the recently
introduced bail-reform legislation.
"We
believe the state has the responsibility to ensure that the amount of
money a person has does not affect the kind of justice they receive.
Rather than investing in new jails to incarcerate people who cannot
make bail, we need to invest in pretrial services and community-based,
community-run wellness alternatives, which are much less costly in
terms of dollars and lessen the damage to men and women who needlessly
spend months or even more in jail." (See "Proposed Legislation in
Massachusetts.")
JusticeHome is an example of
the type of program the Pretrial Working Group supports. Proposed by
Families for Justice as Healing, a Pretrial Working Group partner,
JusticeHome would allow pretrial women to remain in their homes,
receiving services such as drug treatment or mental health services,
prior to their court date.[12]
Until
such alternatives become a reality, another Pretrial Working Group
partner may be able to help. The Massachusetts Bail Fund endeavors to
post bail for people who are unable to do so, and its volunteers help
defendants get addiction treatment and other services in the community
after release.[13]
Requiring
money bail has been shown to be ineffective as crime prevention,
inequitable, and expensive to society. Replacing it with conditional
pretrial release would allow many more people to continue working,
paying rent, and taking care of their families. Properly implemented,
it poses no increased risk to the community and saves money for the
state. Perhaps most important, it helps to restore the principle of
innocent until proven guilty.
Endnotes
- Pretrial
Justice Institute, "Rational and Transparent Bail Decision Making:
Moving from a Cash-Based to a Risk-Based Process" (white paper, March
2012),
- Laura and John Arnold Foundation, "Pretrial Criminal Justice Research" (research summary, November 2013),
- Richard Williams, "Bail or Jail," State Legislatures Magazine, May 2012,
- Erik Moskowitz, "For Jared Remy, Leniency Was the Rule until One Lethal Night," Boston Globe, March 23, 2014.
- Laura and John Arnold Foundation, "Pretrial Criminal Justice Research," November 2013,
- Jean Trounstine, "Why Bail Jails Are a Bad Idea," Boston Magazine, February 6, 2014.
- Testimony before the Massachusetts Judiciary Committee, April 24, 2014.
- This
figure is an approximation, as the cost of two months' incarceration
varies from jail to jail. Sources consulted to arrive at the estimate
include Massachusetts Department of Corrections Research and Planning
Division, Prison Populations Trends 2012 (Concord, Massachusetts: Massachusetts DOC Research and Planning Division, 2013); and Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center, "Prisons, Probation, and Parole,".
- Erika Kates, "Pretrial Detention and Access to Bail for Women" (briefing note, 2013).
- Kaitlyn Schroeder, "Panelists Urged to Rethink Maine's Bail System," Portland Press Herald, October 4, 2013.
- Clifford Keenan, "We Need More Bail Reform," September 2013.
- Broadly speaking, money bail is cash paid by the defendant or on the
defendant's behalf as insurance against the defendant's failing to
appear for his or her court date.
- See http://justiceashealing.org/.
- See http://www.cjpc.org/BailFund.htm.
This commentary was originally published on the Communities & Banking page of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
Website."The views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal
Reserve Bank of Boston or the Federal Reserve System. Information about
organizations and upcoming events is strictly informational and not an
endorsement."
|