Printer
Friendly Version
Note:
The size of the type may be changed by clicking on view at the top
of your browser and selecting "text size". The document
will print in the size you select.
For the Bush men, life’s Holy Grail is The Market – the place where
morality and eternal truths, reside. Taiwanese immigrant David Chang,
a 28 year-old acolyte in the Church of the Living Dollar, has learned
well the tenets of free market Americanism: blessed are the profit-takers.
Chang’s calling led him to bring forth Ghettopoly – a cardboard and
plastic talisman that, for $30, reveals the demonic, subhuman nature
of those darker Americans who have been rightfully banished to a place
of iniquity: the ghetto.
The continuing vitality of White Supremacy is evidenced by the fact
that even non-white immigrants are invited to assimilate American culture
through rituals of Black-bashing. Since America is a frivolous society
in which culture can be purchased by credit card, its most authentic
rituals often arrive by mail, in a game box.
“Somehow I doubt that Chang’s father left Taiwan so his son could
profit off the misery of people trapped in desperate poverty,” wrote
Tim Wise in his Guest Commentary, “Ghettos
are Not a Game: Making Money off the Misery of Others.”
Chang’s
biggest offense is in reinforcing the notion of the ghetto as a
free-standing entity, with an inherent culture, separate from the
rest of the society. But in truth, the ghettos of this nation are
the product of deliberate decisions made by political and economic
elites. Whatever culture springs up in such places is not some
intrinsic pathology unique to the urban poor, but largely the consequence
of institutional racism and economic oppression.
Chang’s
game allows us to continue ignoring the most important issue:
namely, how did the ghetto become the ghetto in the first place?
Answers are easy to find, though apparently Chang wasn’t interested
in discovering them, seeing as how doing so might have cut into
his video game playing and MTV viewing schedule.
An anti-racist writer and
activist, Tim Wise is chronically overworked in the U.S.A. His job
is made more grueling when evangelical race-baiters like Chang, moved
by the spirit of hate-hucksterism, find boutique outlets for their
WMDs (Weapons of Mass Defamation). Chang’s retail distributor, Urban
Outfitters, caters to the “postcollegiate slackerati” through “51
stores in North America and flagship locations in London, Dublin
and Glasgow,” according to Philadelphia
Weekly magazine. The
chain’s president, Richard Hayne, “turned a few hippie beans into
a hip $700 million empire.” Apparently, former hippie Hayne believed
that Ghettopoly deserved a place on his empire’s shelves. Hayne’s
former wife and Urban Outfitters co-founder, Judy Wicks, is a self-described “diehard
liberal activist.”
How
resilient American racism is! In the New American Century, Taiwanese
immigrants and diehard white liberals feel no shame in hawking
racist parlor games, proof that their piece of the nation has truly
gotten over the “pain” of the Civil Rights and Black Power Movement
era.
Urban
Outfitters was the target of Black protest in a number of cities.
NAACP President Kweisi Mfume gave Chang a personal tongue-lashing,
reported the October 12 Washington
Post.
Mfume
said Ghettopoly's images "represent the worst stereotypes
that anyone can conjure up." The Organization of Chinese
Americans, Rep. Mike Honda (D-Calif.), the National Coalition
for Civil Rights Under the Law and other groups also have condemned
Chang.
Chang's
Web site promises the release of four other games: Redneckopoly,
Hoodopoly, Thugopoly and Hiphopoly. Now, he said, those releases
could be in doubt.
"I'm
not a racist person," Chang said. "That's not my intention.
My intention was to show America that stereotypes are ridiculous.
I never knew it would be like this.
"It
does take a toll on you, reading mail after mail," Chang
said. "What have I learned from this? I don't have time
to think. I've been so busy."
Then
he paused and said: "For every bad mail I get, I get 10 orders
for the game at the same time."
Tim
Wise didn’t like that picture, so he worked on the big fellas of
the board game business. We got this email from Wise, last Friday:
Good news. I received
a notice from Hasbro/Milton Bradley that not only are they highly
disgusted by GHETTOPOLY, but they have made clear to Chang their
intention to sue him if he does not cease and desist from making
it and selling it. Here is their statement:
PAWTUCKET, R.I., October
10, 2003 – Hasbro, Inc. (NYSE:HAS) yesterday reiterated its demand
to David Chang, manufacturer of the highly offensive game “Ghettopoly,” that
he immediately stop selling this game to retailers worldwide.
“We want to make it clear that Hasbro
has absolutely no connection to the reprehensible ‘Ghettopoly’ game,” said
Frank Bifulco, President of Hasbro’s U.S. Games. “Mr. Chang’s
game violates our MONOPOLY game intellectual property rights and
Hasbro plans to bring suit against Mr. Chang if he does not immediately
stop selling the game.”
Hasbro
is a worldwide leader in children’s and family leisure time entertainment
products and services, including the design, manufacture and marketing
of games and toys ranging from traditional to high-tech. Both
internationally and in the U.S., its PLAYSKOOL, TONKA, MILTON BRADLEY,
PARKER BROTHERS, TIGER and WIZARDS OF THE COAST brands and products
provide the highest quality and most recognizable play experiences
in the world.
Hopefully, Hasbro will squish
Chang like a bug – finally, a beneficial social role for a corporate
monopolist.
Roslyn Ferguson, of New
Haven, Connecticut expressed her appreciation to Mr. Wise.
Thank
you for your article in the Black Commentary. Just today (October
10th) the local NAACP, here in New Haven successfully forced a
local branch of Urban Outfitters on Yale University campus, (apparently,
Chang's intended audience is white, affluent, elitist college students)
to take this so-called game off its shelves. It was only in today's
paper (The New Haven Register) that I became aware of this latest
nasty piece of work.
Several
friends and I have been attempting to telephone David Chang – it’s
impossible, the line is constantly busy, so we've sent individual
emails.
Again, thank you Mr. Wise
and Black Commentator for giving you the forum.
Urban
Outfitters must learn that insults can be costly, writes Makemba:
I
say we should never use this store again. We don't need
to give someone a second chance in this day and age to prove
they are not racist. The first time out the Black community
should make them a loser. Stop supporting Urban
Outfitters!
From Plainfield,
New Jersey, high school student David Marcus Rutherford writes:
That
Ghettopoly game is sick. After reading the article, I saw how disgusting
it was, but the online visual (ghettopoly.com) made it worse. It
looks disgusting and savage, like somewhere where animals live.
I guess that's how he views black people.
I will never understand how
people's struggles could be funny, though it's only one of many elitist
views of a lot of white Americans that I can't understand. How could
this humor be worth $30.00 dollars plus shipping?
The
Ghettopoly web site is no longer active, but the racist entertainment
market flourishes. According to a self-selective poll by the Miami
Herald, 68 percent of respondents consider Ghettopoly to
be “harmless satire,” while only 32 percent rate the game “racist
and offensive.” Opportunities abound for the free market faithful.
Poet
Arthur Flowers cautions that Urban Outfitters and Mr. Chang aren’t
the only folks dealing in African American denigration. He titled
this piece, Ghettopoly Follies:
Blackfolk
up in arms about that ghetto monopoly game
Forcing us to face the perception of black culture today
Apparently
he got his ideas of what black culture
is like from watching MTV and BET
Hard
to get the indignation up to critical mass
When we are the biggest perpetuators of these images
For the same reason Chang did it.
Because
it sells.
Rootsletter Vol. II by Arthur Flowers
Timely Observations on Politics, Literature
Culture, Struggle and the Hoodoo Way
http://www.rootwork.com/blog.htm
Who’s
pimping who?
readers may note
that we seldom use the term, “conservative.” American politics
is so permeated by racial subtexts, eighteenth century capitalist
icon Adam Smith would find few sensible openings to join in the
conversation. Besides George Bush, the loudest voice in that profane
discourse is Rush Limbaugh, currently undergoing de-drugging treatment.
Limbaugh works hard to be hated by Black folks, since that makes
him beloved among a huge audience of whites. This singular talent
has made him a multi-millionaire. Big corporations fatten his accounts.
Last
week, Guest Commentator Reynard Blake, Jr., sent a “Message
to the Programming Pimps Who Hired Limbaugh at ESPN.”
When he decided to criticize
Donovan McNabb’s performance this season based on race, implying
that the National Football League had an affirmative action program
for quarterbacks, he went too far….
Ok, ESPN… You
have had your day in the sun, with increased ratings; despite the
clear disrespect you have shown your somewhat diverse on-air talent
(that has few, if any, Asians, Latinos, or Native Americans – but
I digress) and viewers by hiring Rush Limbaugh. You knew what
you were getting with Limbaugh, and you got it. You pimped
him to get more money. He was a willing “ho.” However,
if you hire someone like that again (like Michael Savage – sorry,
I did not mean to give you any ideas) not only will I not look at
any of your programs or any other programs affiliated with the Disney
conglomerate, you will probably lose hundreds of thousands, if not
millions of fans that just want to enjoy quality sports programming
(ok, cut the log chopping competition programs) that you create. Don’t
do it again!
Paul Whalen suspects that
Limbaugh’s success is rooted in mass psychosis.
Mr. Reynard Blake’s commentary
was up to your excellent, cogent standards. Prior to the assault
and invasion of Iraq, Norman Mailer wrote an article positing that
the reason for the hostilities was to provide a balm to soothe
the descent of the white male ego from its privileged position.
Mailer opined that especially distressing to the white male ego
was its diminishing role as sports star, with even an African-American
besting the country club set at its last stronghold.
Thus
the question is begged – is Rush a Mailer devotee?
No,
Mr. Whalen. Limbaugh is an Oxycontin devotee.
Freedom Rider’s
debut
Margaret Kimberley’s weekly
Freedom Rider column debuted in excellent form in The Black Commentator,
October 9. Kimberley, a New Yorker born in Ohio, keyed her column
to the sins of omission committed in the September 28 60 Minutes piece
on the arrest, imprisonment, and final exoneration of 10 percent
of the Black population of Tulia, Texas.
Tom Coleman, the undercover,
unrepentant, perjuring cop who framed 46 Tulia residents on drug
charges, provided the title for Kimberley’s piece: “I’m
Proud of What I Did in Tulia.” Coleman’s personal racism is self-evident
on the tube – but,
then what? The CBS news magazine danced around the obvious: “The
sad truth is, these convictions occurred because of white supremacy,” wrote
Kimberley. “The words white supremacy are so loaded, and conjure
up such horrible images that it is no surprise most people aren’t
willing to own them… We acknowledge racism but don’t dwell on it
too much because we want to live our lives without anger and bitterness.” Kimberley
continued:
But we
are still angry and bitter. We waste time asking questions that more
often than not have an obvious and simple answer. “Why am I followed
around in the store?” Answer: white supremacy. “Why does the world
stop brutality in Bosnia but not in the Congo or Liberia?” Answer:
white supremacy. “Why doesn’t Angela Bassett get more and better
roles?” Answer: white supremacy. I could go on with important and
unimportant issues alike but you get the idea. When these questions
arise we should take a deep breath, count to ten and then say, “White
supremacy.” The initial discomfort will be overcome by a feeling
of freedom. Our circumstances may not be any different, but the willingness
to tell the truth will be liberating.
D. Ray Ellis sent Ms. Kimberley
his greetings, and some background on Texas justice.
As a reader of Black Commentator,
Welcome!
Speaking of Coleman and
what happens in the South, maybe this will add to the picture.
Charles W. Williams, who was the chairman of the Texas Commission
on Law Enforcement Standards and Education board, was appointed
to head this14
member board by then governor Bush for a six-year term. The board’s
purpose was to set guidelines for training and standards for all law enforcement
officers in this state (including Tom Coleman).
See following standard
statement of the commission.
“As professional law enforcement
officers, we commit to a zero tolerance for racial, sexual, gender
or religious biased behavior.”
Mr. Williams did not consider
the word nigger to be offensive, but as a term of endearment. Giving
testimony in 1998 at a discrimination lawsuit (he was chief of
police in Marshall, TX) filed by one of his officers, he stated
that " porch monkey" was not a racial slur and that blacks
did not mind being called "niggers."
So it seems
those standards above did not apply to him, the chief standard-setter
in the state.
From Birmingham, Alabama,
Farook Chandiwala writes:
I
am an Asian American of Muslim faith. I can and did empathize
with the plight of our black brothers who were unjustly targeted
in the Tulia drug case. Here we are trying to bring order
from chaos in Iraq, and here we have chaos created in the lives
of our very own innocent citizens. Of course, justice did
eventually prevail, and I am glad it did. Power to you for
doing a good story on this in the Black Commentator. I was
very disturbed viewing this program on 60 Minutes. I
hope we eventually get over this race and ethnicity bias, and learn
to live as decent and fair human beings, children of Adam and Eve.
Deborah D. Clanton is an
insurance company product manager. She also welcomes Margaret Kimberley
to these pages.
Great
article on Tulia. Welcome to my favorite spot on the web.
I look forward to reading more of your columns.
Kenneth
Nunn specializes in the study of systematic injustice. He’s a professor
at the University of Florida’s College of Law, in Gainesville.
Loved
your column on the travesty in Tulia, TX and how it was caused
by white supremacy. You are right on the mark. I have
addressed the root causes of African oppression through the criminal
justice system in a recent law review article, "Race, Crime,
and the Pool of Surplus Criminality: Or Why the War on Crime was
a War on Blacks," 6 Iowa Journal of Race Gender and Justice
381 (2002). It is available on Lexis-Nexis. Keep up the good
work.
For
more of Ms. Kimberley’s work, go to her Freedom Rider blogspot.
She adds new items throughout the week.
Clark vs his own book
With
the publication of his second book, Winning Modern Wars,
in late September, retired general Wesley Clark revealed himself
as a man not to be trusted to tell the truth – about anything,
at any time. Clark waited nearly two years, from November
2001 until just weeks ago, to announce his personal knowledge of
U.S. plans to launch a five-year campaign of warfare “beginning
with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia, and Sudan.”
During
that period, Clark used CNN and numerous other national podiums to
raise his own political profile, never once revealing to the public
that the Iraq invasion was to be Act One of a seven-war play. Now,
he claims to have been “deeply concerned” the entire time about Bush
administration policy – as well he should have been! What a different
light Clark’s knowledge might have shed on the Bush men’s lying orchestrations,
had the general been kind enough to have shared the facts of the
larger game plan. It is just possible that the Iraq war might have
been aborted.
Clearly,
Clark was betting that the invasion and occupation would be successful;
he feared that going public would put him on the wrong side of
history. Now that Iraqi resisters have wrecked the Bush plan, Clark
allows the public into his confidence, and expects to be welcomed
as a seer and a certified member of the Democratic opposition.
What amazing logic! And yet, Clark has hordes of admirers, including
among Black voters.
The
corporate media – as well as, to date, the other eight Democratic
candidates – have chosen not to nail Clark to the wall with his
own, published words. We shall see how long that gaping hole in
the political conversation can be avoided. In the absence of a
spotlight on Clark’s “revelations,” he appears as simply one among
several candidates scrambling to distance themselves from the Bush
war. However, as we wrote in last week’s Cover Story, “Wesley
Clark: Dishonest to the Core, and Probably Nuts,” Clark’s sins
are of a rather different kind.
There is
a fundamental difference between the retired general’s claims
and the pleadings of presidential candidates Rep. Dick Gephardt
and Sen. John Kerry. Both now claim they did not intend that
their votes for the War Powers Resolution in October, 2002
would lead to a unilateral U.S. invasion. Both charge Bush
misled them, the nation and the world about the facts and rationale
of the war.
But in his
book, Clark purports to have known all along (or at least since
Bush’s “Axis of Evil” speech) that the Iraq invasion was “locked
in concrete,” to be followed by wars against six additional
nations that presented no imminent threat to the U.S. Far from
being another victim of bamboozlement, Clark claims to have
possessed an insider’s knowledge of multiple wars in the making.
Did he scream
to high heaven, Stop the madness? No, Clark assumed the pose
of mildly skeptical CNN analyst, occasionally picking here and
there at the edges of Bush policy, as if trying to fine-tune
and perfect it.
Edward
Schaffer is largely in agreement with us, but supports Clark, anyway.
The incredible article "Two
Civilized Men" is as good and truthful as any I have read.
If my choice, General Clark – as the only candidate who can beat
the miserable BUSH – wins, his feet must be held to the ideas of
your writers.
Wesley Clark's
life seems to be a frenzied dance (foxtrot) to the center of the ballroom.
His feet don't stand still long enough to be set afire.
At some point, Clark
will self-combust.
Gail Swan is one
of Clark’s African American supporters. Her position seems to be,
Bush is a bigger nut than Clark.
I
read with interest your article about Gen. Clark. Please tell
me what politician can we believe and who isn't a little nuts
to go into politics in the first place.
Once
again, the African American community is divided and George Bush
will be reelected.
In
my opinion, George Bush is not about telling the truth, especially
to the African American community who he is afraid of and yet
knows how to handle by getting us to not focus on voting
Democratic for President.
If
Wes Clark is the nominee, I will not split my vote as the Republicans
want us to do. I will vote for the Democratic Nominee.
It
would be great if the nominee could be Al Sharpton but unless
something magical happens, that will not be the case.
And, speaking of nuts,
George Bush is at top of my list for NUTS and yet there were and
will be African Americans who will once again vote for him
because they have been brain washed to believe that the Democrats
have not done anything for them. My question is... "and
what have the Republicans done for us lately? " Oh yes, they
have given us Colin and Condi – who feel they have to lie for their
boss and master.
I
continue to be shocked and awed that so many African Americans
want to "split their vote" or " vote their beliefs" or " believe
that it doesn't matter who we vote for…no one cares what happens
to us" or " the Democrats take our votes for granted
so we will punish them and vote for the Green party."
The
only ones that will punish us will be us!
Wes
Clark for President!
Kathleen O'Connor Wang writes
from an intriguing address: Diamond Bar, California.
Good article. Thanks for
publishing all Clark’s remarks about the War. Like we need a man
who oversaw the bombing of Kosovo to take over where Bush left
off. Like we need a man who thought our soldiers swarming over
Baghdad after the immoral and brutal Shock and Awe campaign
was a wonderful sight, to be Bush's successor. Hell No!
Al Buono
recoils at the scent of spit and polish.
Excellent
read on Clark. I wonder at this country's fascination with
generals – Washington to Jackson to Grant to Eisenhower; we'd probably
have elected Custer if Sitting Bull hadn't saved us the problem; which
makes me think of Charles Bronson's famous last line in 'THE DIRTY
DOZEN": "I could get used t'killin' generals."
The “top tier” is oblivious
to the obscenity of their Social Security retirement age debate.
Former Vermont Governor Howard Dean is in trouble for having once
suggested that the age be raised to 70, to ensure the continued “solvency” of
the system. However, Dean’s sin is worse than the rest of the media-favored
pack only in degree – they all discuss Social Security retirement
in insurance company actuarial terms, morbid calculations that
fail entirely to address the basic questions: why are people expected
to work hard for much of their lives, and what is the value of
life after one’s time in the workforce is over? These are the logical,
natural and civilized questions with which societies grapple
once there is enough wealth to provide acceptable standards of
food, clothing, education and shelter for all. It is at this point
that human populations can envision the larger possibilities of
existence, as individuals, as nations, and as a species.
Sarah Santora
works with the Hartford Area Habitat for Humanity. From Manchester,
Connecticut, she writes:
Bravo Black Commentator!
Your article on Sharpton and Kucinich gives me hope that not everyone
in America is delusional! Isn't it ironic that Sharpton and Kucinich
consistently draw standing ovations from their audiences, yet are
mocked by the media as "bottom tier" candidates. As a
volunteer for the Kucinich 2004 campaign I talk to people every
day about the coming elections. Those who are not already completely
brainwashed are more open to change than ever before. We must remember
that we are not alone in this struggle. All across the rest of
the planet, eyes are focused on our next election. Other nations
now realize with stunning clarity that it MATTERS who is running
the USA. It can have a direct and swift effect on their quality
of life and health.
Dennis
Kucinich will have a book published next month titled "A Prayer
for America" and Rev. Sharpton's book "Go
And Tell Pharaoh" has been out for some time. Let's renew our dedication
to humanity and make these two books bestsellers both here and abroad!
It is time for us to evolve to the next level as humans and stop
solving our problems by dropping bombs on other humans! Barbarism
does not have to be our destiny!
Doc James Menton was among
the swarm of new visitors to this
past week, introduced to us through Alternet.
This
was my first intro to The Black Commentator via Alternet. I read “Two
Civilized Men,” and feel like I can breath again. Refreshing
and challenging, poetic and pithy dancing around an ever expanding
spiral of truth and clarity unfettered by the tidal wave of ignorance
that pervades our times. Thanks for the light.
We
got light-headed reading that one – while spiraling, expanding
and dancing.
Irwin
Wingo is also a newcomer.
Just today
I became aware of Black Commentator on Alternet. I greatly appreciate
the refreshing and innovative approach taken by Glen Ford and Peter
Gamble in their assessment of the Democratic candidates. The part
about our lack of a social contract in this country should
be a required preamble to any American history course.
In which case, we would
gladly forgo royalties.
We were pleased to hear from Marla Crites, an ESL teacher at Shasta
Community College, California.
A million
thanks to Glen Ford and Peter Gamble for their insightful and intelligent
analysis of the Democratic candidates' positions on the important
issues facing us as well as to The Black Commentator for publishing
it. I absolutely agree with them that Kucinich and Sharpton
are the only candidates who make any sense. They are both so denigrated
by the media that it is truly heartening to read an honest and "civilized" assessment.
We need to see more of this kind of press if America is to be saved
from its own worst tendencies.
George Bush claims to see light at the end of the Iraq tunnel. Jeff
Richardson sees the light over the exit door.
This article
was well-written and truly inspiring. You have touched the
heart of what sets these men apart from the pack. "Cut
and run" is exactly what we should do, leaving the money we
can afford to go to humanitarian purposes and rebuilding efforts
instead of "security".
Mr. Richardson is referring
to Carol Moseley-Braun’s insistence that the U.S. not “cut and run” in
Iraq. The former Illinois Senator went on to say, “it's going to
be important for us to come up with the money to make certain that
our young men and women and our reputation as leaders in the world
is not permanently destroyed by the folly of preemptive war.” We
fail to grasp the meaning of this sentence, and appeal to Ms. Crites,
the politically astute English teacher from California, for assistance.
Dr. Lora Chamberlain is
having a good time reading in
Chicago.
Thank you
for such a thoughtful article about Kucinich and Sharpton. I
have been saying for some time now that these two men are stealing
the show. I wonder sometimes if the rest of them are just virtual
candidates, holograms of the men they used to be, because of their
plastic demeanors! It is certainly obvious that Kucinich and Sharpton
are the MOST passionate about what they are saying and Sharpton also
appears to be having the most fun!!! Civilized, intelligent, passionate
and with good senses of humor, what's not to like about these two!
Please give them as much press as you can.
Kucinich
supporter Carla Herwitz is quite protective of her candidate – be
advised to watch your mouth in her presence.
"Two
Civilized Men Against the Barbarians" was almost perfect. There's
just one little thing that I think you might want to re-think.
You
termed
Dennis
Kucinich
a
leftist. This
not
only
is
likely
to
make
him
less
electable
in
this
country
if
too
many
people
hear
it,
but
is
inaccurate
as
well.
Kucinich,
whom
I
support
and
am
campaigning
for,
is
not
a
leftist. He
is
an
old-fashioned,
American
liberal. We
have
come
so
far
from
the
basic
liberalities
of
the
United
States
Constitution,
that
pure
liberals
can
look
like
leftists
to
us. I'm
hoping
you'll
make
a
correction
to
that
one
sentence
and
publish
it
soon.
Other
than that, I think you were right on.
is, of course, not written for people who shun "leftists," and
we will not shape our language to suit those who do. Kucinich
would be a centrist in the (ruling) Swedish Social Democratic Party.
Here in the U.S., that puts him decidedly to the left
of the spectrum. This is also the political space where most
African Americans are clustered. In the African American spectrum,
Sharpton is a man of the Center. We explored this subject in depth
in our November 21, 2002 analysis, “Poll
Shows Black Political Consensus Strong.”
Sharpton and Kucinich share
positions on most matters. They are both lefties in the general
American scheme of things – a political landscape dominated by racism
and reaction.
As discussed earlier in
this column, we try to avoid the terms "liberal" and "conservative," since they
have become devoid of meaning in American discourse. We prefer to
order people and tendencies from left to right.
Writer Al Buono
cited Charles Bronson on General Clark. George McCalip is a more
peaceful correspondent.
Your
wonderful article, "Two Civilized Men Among the Barbarians," reminded
me of a quote from Mahatma Ghandi, when asked what he thought
of Western civilization: "I think it would be a good idea."
Keep
up the good work.
Putting out a political
journal involves more than words and attitude. Alana Lea understands.
As an avid Kucinich supporter,
I received the URL to your cover article this last week from someone
in our network. The first thing I noticed was the fabulous graphics – but
I was too busy to read the article until just now. What wonderful
journalism lies within these fine clothes! And certainly, I agree
wholeheartedly with the opinions of the writer. But then there's
more...
You
have
created
the
most
outstanding
online
magazine
I've
seen
to
date.
I'm
the
Art
Director
of
American
Northwest
Vintage
Homes online
magazine,
and
recognize
the
beauty,
ease
and
simplicity.
It's
absolutely
elegant.
Cheers,
cheers and more cheers!
Design credit belongs to
our art director, Susan Gamble, who also designs gardens and whose
background includes creating beautiful environmentally friendly clothing
for
women.
Julian Vigo likes our work.
"Two
Civilized Men Among the Barbarians" is one of the most beautiful
critiques I have ever read! Wow! When I read this
I thought: "I want to meet these two humans!"
We assume that Ms. Vigo
means Kucinich and Sharpton, rather than Ford and Gamble. The former
are much better company, although not as good looking.
The Un-American French
At the time of this writing
the United Nations Security Council appeared set to vote on another
U.S. resolution on Iraq. As we pointed out in our September 18
Cover Story, “What’s Up With the French? The Not-American Strategy,” France “speaks
for world, not just European, opinion” when it upholds
the principle of national sovereignty for Iraq.
But of course, France was
a global colonial power, itself, and remains a neo-colonial actor
in the world. It is the U.S. lunge for planetary domination that
has placed France in the forefront of international order and legality.
We wrote:
One
million white Frenchmen lived in Algeria in 1956 when the U.S.
thwarted French-British-Israeli plans to seize the Suez Canal from
Egypt. The British soon acclimated themselves to the American shadow,
while the French later developed their own nuclear weapons capability
and withdrew from the command structure of NATO. Believing themselves
peculiarly conversant with Third World perceptions and sensibilities
(based largely on the intimate Algerian experience), and determined
to preserve French business interests and international stature,
successive governments positioned Paris as an “alternative” Great
Power. What the blustering, bulldog Americans mistook as French
pretension was, in reality, a sophisticated strategy that played
against crude, racist American bullying tactics in the Third World.
Yes, the French are imperialists, but at least they are not Americans.
Akili, a writer
who prefers one name, sent us his analysis of the American predicament:
Much
like Cinderella, the true state of our natural condition has
been laid bare for all to see.
While our venerable leaders
were indulging in childish chest beating, and creating "Freedom
Fries" on Capitol Hill, America quietly fumbled the torch of
world leadership to an opportunistic France who probably couldn't
believe the new fortune that just befell them. Those of us who are
more than consumers of corporate potato chip news, and actually read
books and have familiarized ourselves with history should know, that
the white folks will never advocate a position that is counterproductive
to the goals of their friends and allies, unless it is to decide
who should rule the world. Over that small matter, white folks have
no problem spilling each other's blood.
BushMob
Inc. truly over reached themselves and never even knew it. The
Transatlantic buddyship that America has enjoyed over half a
century, was borne of the blood shed in W.W.II and the communist
threat that followed shortly thereafter. Maybe someone should
have broken it to the Bushites that the Berlin Wall came down
in the late Eighties, and communist Russia not too long after.
The very need of NATO's existence crumbled along with it.
The
learned
were
shocked
that
WE
were
shocked
when
Europe
refused
to
heel
like
the
well
trained
dog
it
pretended
to
be
when
the
Russian
Bear
was
prowling
and
prancing
about.
The
only
world
body
that
was
relegated
to
irrelevance
in
this
new
little
war
against
Saddam
was
NATO,
but
my
position
is,
if
it
wasn't
this,
it
would
have
been
some
other
crucial
matter.
Europe
has
placed
its
bets
on
a
new
vision:
the
European
Union.
France
seeks
to
establish
itself
as
a
point
of
leadership
in
this
new
vision.
America
has
served
Europe's
purpose,
and
their
need
of
us
is
virtually
extinct.
Ironically,
we
were
in
complicity
with
this
last
minute
conspiracy
of
our
own
making.
We
traumatized
the
world
as
they
recoiled
in
horror
as
we
broke
international
laws,
overstepping
many
a
boundary
that
we
ironically
helped
to
create,
and
against
fierce
international
opposition,
rained
fire
on
poor brown
folks.
WE,
in
the
collective
subconscious
of
the
international
community
have
shown
ourselves
to
be
no
more
than
the
polished
gangsters
and
thugs
they
always
suspected
we
were
but
couldn't
truly
prove,
although there
have
always
been
rumors
of
covert
proxy
wars,
coups,
and
the
propping
up
of
brutal
dictatorships
run
on
the
behalf
of
the
American
taxpayer,
in
far
away
lands
where
poor
indigenous
folks
who
are
not
white
and
therefore
cannot
be
trusted
with
democracy
in
its
truest
sense,
reside
in
death
and
misery.
The PR campaign that
we've run for decades to prop up the mirage of our idealistic leadership,
that purportedly seeks to bring the pursuit of happiness to all
peoples on God's green earth has now become moot, and the world
now whispers behind our back in fear. They will seek new alliances,
with good reason, to solve the problems of their peoples, and France
is falsely shining the torch to the EU. When empire eventually
comes to the EU (and mark my words that empire will come), and
reaches its apex, they will prove to be cut from the same cloth
of the phantom empire they just replaced.
I
do not understand why we people of color are more than content
to leave our social, cultural, economic, and political future
in the hands of an openly hostile majority (that would probably
be happier to see us still swinging from trees), and the ready-made-for-TV,
microwaveable black political leaders and role models they plant
for our viewing pleasure.
That...is reality.
The pivotal Indian vote
We haven’t had the opportunity
to do a piece on the ascension of Arnold Schwarzenegger and the demise
of Ward Connerly’s Racial Privacy
Initiative, in California.
So writer Joseph Osorio, from Oakland, filled us in on the essentials.
The day
following Tuesday's California Recall, a close friend commented he'd
spent the evening watching lemmings run off the cliff on his local
news channel. The demographics I read indicate that among all voting
groups, Schwarzenegger had by far the least support from Blacks.
Although the data I read had no mention of how Indians voted, I conducted
an exhaustive poll within my own household. With five of us representing
three tribes and all voting, NONE of us voted for Ahh-nold !
Maybe our respective people
just instinctively realize we have the most to lose. Ahh-nold says
California Indians "aren't paying their fair share" of
casino profits. Somehow I don't feel too bad about lacking gratitude
for all the White man has done for us.
On a related subject, and
following Columbus Day, a gentleman named Pedro wrote to us from
London, to point out a repetitive and embarrassing error.
Dear ,
I keep
reading the same misspelling in different US publications, including
yours:
"For
a
start, recommends
Trinicenter.com,
from
which
the
December
26
article
was
reprinted;
Narco
News,
the
best, daily
coverage
of
the
U.S.-financed,
cocaine-fueled
war
in
Columbia,
which
has
been
disastrous
for
the
Black
population;
and
AfroCubaWeb,
an
excellent
cultural
and
political
source.”
It should read Colombia. Columbia
is your NY University.
Thanks to you, too. I
love very
much. It’s simply great. Thanks for mentioning our
site (www.afrocubaweb.com).
We did a search of our archives
and found that we had misspelled Colombia scores of times. We’ve
fixed them all, and apologize for each one.
We cannot begin to apologize
to the unknown number of readers whose mailboxes were filled with
multiples of our October 9 Issue messages. The barrage was caused
by a software problem at the company that sends out our weekly notifications.
They assure us it will never happen again.
Fortunately for Charles
Birchwood, the glitch passed over his address. He’s not mad at us,
one bit.
What beautiful
analytical insight. I am going to spread the word among my friends
to join up and give support to your magazine. Finally, we have a
vehicle that stimulates our thought processes and provokes us to
action. Thanks.
And Pam Shorey, in Willimantic,
Connecticut, makes us feel – almost redeemed.
This
is the best online magazine I've seen! Keep it coming!
www.blackcommentator.com
Your
comments are welcome.
Visit
the Contact Us page for E-mail
or Feedback.
Back
|