Barack
Obama would have done well to have more fully internalized this
famous phrase from William Faulkner’s 1950 book Requiem
for a Nun. Obama used
this phrase in his speech on racism, A
More Perfect Union, that
some say won him the presidency in 2008. How he failed to incorporate
and internalize this analysis is a mystery to me; I suspect a
continuing, residual internal psychic-emotional revulsion at feelings
of rejection, pain, and anger at racial discrimination he suffered in
his youth. He, emotionally, has difficulty holding on to the past
being present in the now. He falsely wants to believe that the future
can start now, in the present, without any reengagement with the
past. As a black man, I know that black males internalize their past
pain and anger in different ways.
Racism is endemic both
in terms of conscious and unconscious racism in continuing pockets in
the population and it is more extensively endemic through the
functioning of public and private systems that produce racist results.
Faulkner’s
phrase about the past encapsulates a cultural meme that is intensely
poignant in the lives of African Americans and other colonialized,
enslaved, suppressed and
oppressed peoples in the US. The larger society and especially many
of the oppressors’ offspring and many beneficiaries of the
oppression would like very
much for the past to be
past. They would like for everyone in the US to be born into a human
political, economic, and cultural environment that is full of justice
and equal opportunity without much admittance of past wrongs, without
much repair of past damage, and with no corrections to the various
systems that continue to perpetrate and maintain that damage. The
reality is far from that because “the past is never dead…it’s
not even past.”
Obama’s
2008 speech was masterful in reiterating past wrongs without
assigning agency to the perpetrators or
– even more importantly – assigning agency to those aspects of
our systems that still carry and maintain racism. The speech’s
intent was the rejection of the emotionality
– not the
historical
substance – of candidate Obama’s pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright.
Specific segments of the intellectually powerful, evocative, and
emotional sermons of Rev. Wright were almost endlessly looping on the
Internet and were being repeatedly rebroadcast in the commercial
media. I can hear the Reverend now: “God Dam America!” for what
you did and are doing to people-of-color. The presidential
candidate’s speech formally cut all relationship with his pastor
and suggested that the problems of racism in the US could be
addressed by folding in black community
concerns and deficits in to the struggle to resolve the general
deficits experienced by any person or group in the US. In other
words, “quiet down and wait your turn.” In other words, “trust
me…let me get this presidency and, of course, I am going to take
care of you while I take care of everyone else.” Blacks have heard
that
tale many times in our history.
The A
More Perfect Union
speech was delivered on March 18, 2008 in Philadelphia before an
audience at the National Convention Center with frequent references
to the Constitutional Convention that had taken place there in 1787.
That was the moment in our history when it was formally decided that
blacks and women would not be able to vote and the historical moment
when it was decided that black bodies would be counted as 3/5ths of a
white body for population counts to define state representation in
Congress. [Because of the decisions made at that place and time, most
free or escaped blacks fought
for the British Crown
which was rapidly moving toward the abolition of the slave trade
(1807).]
Obama expressed a
tragic lack of
understanding of how the past does not go away that easily. He
castigated Wright for his view that “…sees white racism as
endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that
we know is right with America.”
Obama
went on to
say that Wright's views were "not only wrong but divisive... at
a time when we need unity." Obama needed the
appearance of unity for
the sake of the easily scared and sometimes frozen by guilt white
liberals who he wanted to vote for him; but, Rev.
Wright was and is right.
Racism is endemic both in terms of conscious and unconscious racism
in continuing pockets in the population and it is more extensively
endemic through the functioning of public and private systems
that
produce racist
results. It is Obama that
is wrong. Neither
the US’ wrongs nor
the US’ rights should be elevated above the other; the Both/And
paradigm, not the frequently inaccurate and misleading Either/Or
paradigm, provides the more reality based logical paths to justice,
equality, and peace.
|
|
Obama
– like Romney – is adrift in a collection of cultural memes that
include preferences or emphases for the use of the Either/Or
paradigms. Our political and electoral system – probably more than
any such system in the world – glorifies and deeply epitomizes the
Either/Or paradigm. Those who participate as candidates, activists,
or voters are massively, mentally pushed in to Either/Or
understandings and Either/Or decisions despite the unreality of it
all. Because of the multicultural nature of his life, Obama and many
people-of-color in the US are both better able to deal with the
subtleties and nuances that arise in the real world where
perspectives, framings, and conflicting truths exist.
People-of-color, with multiple identities, and multiple cultural
foundations are better able to articulately switch between the
utterances, postures, and memes of different cultures. These mental,
cultural skills have been well displayed by many over the years and
they give advantage for personal advancement in a multicultural
environment. However, the Obama’s, the Oprah’s, and the other
color-line-breaking Firsts
have historically changed
little when it comes to
systemic racism. The President has spent more than three years
learning some hard lessons about the endemic nature of false Western
cultural paradigms, vampire-like corporate memes, and facing
massively resistant camouflaged racism.
Obama, emotionally, has difficulty holding on
to the past being present in the now. He falsely wants to believe that
the future can start now, in the present, without any reengagement with
the past.
One
of the cultural behaviors that “educated Negros” like Barack
Obama take on is voluntary suppression of their emotions, especially
their anger. Western culture associates emotions with women, with
“primitive” savage people, and with a lack of intellect. The
President’s legendary “coolness” under fire must derive from
this practiced emotional suppression and the rechanneling of emotion
into intellectual activity. Cornel West and Michael Eric Dyson have
the brilliance to re-inject emotion into their speech without
increased volume or angry tones by their choice of sharp edged
terminology and evocative phrasing. Obama, whose caretaker
grandmother stated her fear of walking down the street past a black
man and who openly expressed her racism in his face, built up mental
insulation between himself and his emotions.
Candidate
Obama stated of Rev. Wright that “…anger is not always
productive...it keeps us from squarely facing our own complicity in
our condition, and prevents the African-American community from
forging the alliances it needs to bring about real change. But the
anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn
it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of
misunderstanding that exists between the races.” Obama clearly
understands that our justified anger must be engaged but he offers no
direction for that. Anger is a natural mental process that, in
certain circumstances, healthy human minds and bodies experience. I
think that Obama engaged his anger for decades vicariously
through the powerful, evocative sermons of Rev. Jeremiah Wright; but
for the sake of an election, he cut that off and offered no
substitute. Having a black President is not a substitute for
exorcising the racist past that is still with us fully but more
subtly as Obama learned.
There
can be little doubt that our past racist history has significantly
blunted Obama’s presidency. He is disrespected like no previous
president from
the clear disdain from the British and Israeli Prime Ministers to
the persistent, ridiculous myths about his birth and religion to
the “you liar” shout-out on the floor of Congress during State of
the Union Address to
being physically bear hugged and picked up by a stranger at a
campaign event without the intervention of the Secret Service. His
efforts to have folks respectfully come together around mutual
concerns – even using previously agreed on solutions – has been
strongly rejected by a significant portion of mostly the white male
population.
They would like for everyone in the US to be
born into a human political, economic, and cultural environment that is
full of justice and equal opportunity without much admittance of past
wrongs, without much repair of past damage, and with no corrections to
the various systems that continue to perpetrate and maintain that
damage.
Recognizing
the need to exorcise racist differences, the South African ANC (who
would now be labeled terrorist) leaders took that nation through the
long and emotional
process of The Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Most point to
this process as successful even though it was flawed and did not
fully implement the reparations
pledges of the legislation. Congressman Conyers’ bill for a study
of the on-going impacts of slavery and discrimination has – after
more than twenty years – not even reached Congressional committee
discussion level. Clinton (“the first black President”) attempted
a poorly resourced national dialog on race. Clinton, at least,
deserves credit for trying. Obama’s administration has seriously
suffered from racism. He lacks support from the population pool where
racism is most virulent: uneducated white males. Progressive,
anti-racist political activists are settling for the kinds of
institutional reform that can lift the mostly white middle class but
that does not address the generational impacts of injustices of the
past that are manifest in enormous (stolen) wealth differences rather
than income differences. It is time that somebody exhibited a little
healthy anger combined with the wisdom of revolutionary
patience to achieve
fundamental changes rather than to just
re-elect a unconsciously-suppressed black man intent on integration
into a cosmetically reformed collapsing, “burning house.”
[Note:
Nafsi ya Jamii is the Swahili phrase that translates in English to
“The Soul Community”]
BlackCommentator.com
Columnist,
Wilson Riles, is a
former
Oakland,
CA City Council Member. Click
here
to
contact Mr. Riles.
|