Apr 26, 2012 - Issue 469 |
|||||
|
|||||
When Justice is
Not Served
|
|||||
It is true. I am not the biggest fan of law enforcement. No, it is not because I’ve been arrested several times during my lifetime. No, it is not because people who wear like clothing constitute “gangs” and they scare me. It is because law enforcement - and those who pride themselves as law enforcers - too often neglect to come clean in their misdeeds and unequal dispensation of justice. I never want to see anyone go to jail. Jail - and prison - are “life-takers.” But as with law enforcement, jails and prisons are necessary in an “order-modeled” society. My problem comes when the mechanisms to send the guilty to prison - especially when those deserving of prison are law enforcement - is retarded. What
disturbs me greatly is law enforcers who don’t “do their jobs” by allowing
the guilty to roam about this A
recent case in What?! How many Americans do you know can get away with that? “The
risk of loss of life on both ends is far too great,” said the DA. I am
in disbelief! I watched law enforcement go after David Koresh in 1993
with force and authority though that episode could have been deemed a
botched one. Government always believes they have a right to “get their
man.” They go after people in my community all the time! I’ll begin on
the “low impact” end of a continuum with car speed chases through densely
populated neighborhoods and end with this: I can’t remind people enough
of how law enforcement went after the Black separatist group, MOVE, in
After
reigning 10,000 bullets on the compound within ninety minutes, city officials
on the command of its then-Mayor, W. Wilson Goode (a Black man), dropped
a bomb on MOVE holdouts - only the second time America has bombed its
own people from the air. (The first time was on Blacks in The
militancy of In my soon-to-be-published book, “As a Condition of Your Freedom,” I note that guns are the equalizer. I am not against guns, only for the reason as stated in the US Constitution: “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”…as it relates to “a well regulated militia.” What Gray and millions of other “law-abiding” Americans are doing in the name of the second amendment is illegal. There’s nothing “well regulated” about Gray’s resistance and defiance of federal authorities. The only logical reason that law enforcement hasn’t forced its way in to “get their man” Gray is because of the color of his skin. I can’t think of a single incidence of a Black man who dared stand-off law enforcement - for a day, much less, a decade! - and lived to tell about it. Fear on the part of law enforcement is an insane proposition. Their fear of a violent confrontation only sullies and belies the myths of their bravery and the integrity of their profession. Law enforcement is quick to shoot unarmed Black men throughout this nation’s past - and in more recent history: Shawn Bell in Queens, New York, Timothy Thomas in Cincinnati, Ohio, Oscar Grant in Oakland, Amadou Diallo in New York City, Archie Elliot III in Prince George’s County (a Washington, DC suburb) and Arthur McDuffie near Miami. Just a few of the Black men made martyrs by “the brave men and women of law enforcement” that we are conditioned to respect, slight [sight] unseen. Yes, I am angry about the excuses made regarding this unequal dispensation of “Lady Justice.” With the assassination of Trayvon Martin, our nation’s dirty legacy has been re-awakened; its reputation once again sullied on the world stage; and more painfully piercing: Our nation’s people are cheated when justice is not served. BlackCommentator.com
Columnist, Perry
Redd, is the former Executive Director of
the workers rights advocacy, Sincere Seven, and author of the on-line
commentary, “The
Other Side of the Tracks.” He is the host of the internet-based talk
radio show, Socially
Speaking in
|
|||||
|
|
||||