Mar 22, 2012 - Issue 464 |
|||||
|
|||||
The Crisis and
Harold Cruse
|
|||||
One of our great ancestors, Harold Cruse, wrote a book, The Crisis of the Negro Intellectual: A Historical Analysis of the Failure of Black Leadership, which was published in 1967, at the height of the Black Power Movement. This insightful book stirred up a spirited conversation in the African Liberation Movement. That conversation revolves around the weaknesses of our movement, the direction of our movement, and the inability of some of the leaders and thinkers of our movement to understand what Brother Cruse calls “The Great American Ideal.” This problem continues to linger with us today. Brother
Cruse spent most of his activist and organizing days in This
year However When we use the term intellectual we are talking about people who struggle around ideas - writers, poets, scholars, researchers, teachers, students, and activists. Intellectuals are people who grapple with ideas and who function in the cultural, political, educational, and economic domains of the society. As Dr. Anderson Thompson always says, “Ideas are weapons of war.” With this definition, let us review briefly some of the ideas and concepts that Brother Cruse presented in The Crisis of the Negro Intellectual. One of the major points Cruse makes is the African American intellectuals are pathological in their approach to the choices available to them. It is Cruse’s observation that they appear to adopt the values of the dominant group, which he describes as the white Anglo Saxon Protestant. It
was in the first chapter of The Crisis of the Negro Intellectual
that Cruse raised this question of the problem of identity of the African
in Cruse
illustrated this in his book when he described the following: “In 1940,
as one of my first acts in the pursuit of becoming a more social being,
I joined a YMCA amateur drama group in Cruse continued on this point. “I wondered why and very naively expressed my sentiments about it. The replies that I got clearly indicated these amateur actors were not very favorable to the play about Negro life, although they would not plainly say so. Despite the fact that this question of identity was first presented to me within the context of the program of a small, insignificant amateur drama group, its implications ranged far beyond.” Another
problem Cruse addresses is that the African in From
the point of view of Brother Cruse, the African in For
Brother Cruse, the crisis was whether the African in BlackCommentator.com Columnist, Conrad W. Worrill, PhD, is the National Chairman Emeritus of the National Black United Front (NBUF). Click here to contact Dr. Worrill. |
|||||
|
|
||||