The
only thing more remarkable than the news of the Rupert Murdoch
hacking-bribery scandal itself is the rate of its unraveling
- and Murdoch�s unraveling.� For this international kingmaker
and media mogul - who built an empire on yellow journalism
and destroying the lives of others - it seems rather fitting
that his fall from grace would take place under such sensationalism
and salaciousness.
Allegations that the now-defunct News of the World,
Murdoch�s largest tabloid, maintained a massive phone hacking
operation targeting 4,000 people - including politicians,
celebrities and murder victims - has led to 10 arrests in
the UK. �One of those arrested was Rebekah Brooks, Murdoch�s
deputy at News International until she recently resigned.�
And the top two officials at Scotland Yard quit their posts
amid allegations that the corporation bribed the police.�
And now Rupert, his son James and the ousted Brooks come
before the British Parliament, humbled and hat in hand,
to apologize and express their shock that this sort of wrongdoing
even took place.
U.S. lawmakers have hinted that the phone hacking scandal
is about to spill over into the States, as the FBI announced
an investigation into alleged hacking of 9-11 victims and
their families.� Meanwhile, Murdoch�s News Corp. has lost
billions
in just days, and rightly so, as he was forced to drop his
bid to buy British company BSkyB.� The deal would have garnered
him 40 percent of the UK broadcasting market.� And oddly,
in a case of peculiar timing, the whistleblower, a News
of the World reporter, mysteriously died.� And certainly
there�s more to come.� After all, it is already known that
Murdoch has paid about $655
million to erase charges of corporate espionage in the
U.S.��
Given the questionable ways in which the billionaire has
conducted business over the years, the revelations should
not come as a complete surprise.� As he destroyed unions,
competitors and political enemies, Rupert Murdoch was allowed
to make his own set of the shady rules while everyone watched.�
And some were paid to look the other way.� When one person
is allowed to amass such power and influence, graft and
corruption are often a part of the process.� In Britain,
the Murdoch family purportedly used criminals to do dirty
jobs.� And like any proper organized crime boss, he owned
politicians, carrying them in his pocket �like so many nickels
and dimes.��
In America, Murdoch�s New York Post and Fox
News, masquerading as champions of working-class populism,
offend our sensibilities as they endorse the most regressive
rightwing policies.� The Post�s cartoon depiction
of President
Obama as an ape shot to death by two white police officers
reflects a long history of racially offensive images and
words promulgated by that newspaper.� Moreover, Murdoch�s
�fair and balanced� Fox News Channel has operated as a media
arm of the Republican Party, and an official network of
the Tea Party movement.� Fox News has carved out its niche
by offering race-baiting as standard fare, and offering
a soapbox to personalities with ties to hate groups, including
Glenn Beck.� Despite this, lawmakers have willingly appeared
on the network.� And one must wonder if Murdoch bought his
U.S. citizenship, which he needed as a prerequisite for
owning American television stations.
With the mogul�s downfall and removal from the company he
built now a plausible scenario, Rupert Murdoch provides
a cautionary tale.� Journalism at its best acts as a disinfectant.�
But through the use of race baiting and outright lying in
the reporting of the so-called �news,� Murdoch has polluted
the public discourse and has helped to defile and degrade
our politics.� And while journalists at their best are supposed
to act as a check on official power, News Corp. has reveled
in its ability to accumulate power by any means and serve
the interests of the greedy, a media version of the Koch
brothers.� No scruples, no code of ethics, no social responsibility,
just cozying up to the powerful and providing them cover.�
Last year, News Corp. contributed $1 million each to the
Republican
Governors Association and the Chamber of Commerce
on the grounds that it was �in the interest of the country
and of all the shareholders ... that there be a fair amount
of change in Washington.������
The Murdochs still control a great deal of U.S. media real
estate, most of which includes TV and movie studios, and
they will undoubtedly scramble to protect it.� But things
now must change.� For all of the harm News Corp. has caused,
something good must come out of it.� For one, society must
prevent the circumstances that allow a future News Corp.
to weld such power, unregulated and unaccountable, and unduly
influence the affairs of government.
Democracy is stifled when a single player controls too much
of the airwaves for its own good, and dresses up partisan
hackery, unsubstantiated opinions and outright fabrications
as the truth.� However, a disinterested, uninformed public�disengaged
from public life, perhaps due to the bad economy and daily
stressors and hardships, among other reasons�facilitates
democratic rot as well.�
The American
Psychological Association defines civic engagement as
�Individual and collective actions designed to identify
and address issues of public concern.�� The New
York Times defines civic engagement as �working
to make a difference in the civic life of our communities
and developing the combination of knowledge, skills, values
and motivation to make that difference. It means promoting
the quality of life in a community, through both political
and non-political processes.��
Morally and civically responsible people see themselves as
part of a larger social fabric.� They take ownership of
society�s problems, and may even take action when necessary.�
One organization that hopes to foster civic engagement and
leadership in local communities is the Philadelphia-based
Media Mobilizing Project.�
In partnership with several other community organizations
- Philadelphia Student Union, SEIU Healthcare PA, Casa Monarca,
Unified Taxi Workers Alliance, and Logan CDC - MMP just
opened five Public Computer Centers throughout the city
to train people in computer skills and community journalism.�
The centers were made possible with $18.2 million in federal
stimulus funds.�
MMP is a member of the Freedom Rings Partnership, which
is led by the City of Philadelphia Division of Technology
and the Urban Affairs Coalition, and is designed to provide
computers, computer training and internet access to low-income
communities.� A total of 77 centers in community centers
and social service organizations throughout the city will
train 15,000 people in digital literacy.� �MMP
and the groups we are partnering with have led the way in
improving education, working conditions, healthcare and
quality of life for Philadelphians,� said Desi Burnette,
Strategic Coordinator with Media Mobilizing Project.
��This program will strengthen our ability to build
community-driven solutions to the current economic crisis.��
And as Bryan Mercer, MMP Program Organizer noted, they will
use twenty-first century technology to bring low-income
communities together to solve their problems.� �In
a time of budget cuts and unemployment, these Public Computer
Centers offer a way to connect people � not just to the
Internet, but to each other,� he said.
So, at a time when the policies of large corporations, disconnected
from the community, are tearing the fabric of those very
communities, it is good to see efforts to build them up.�
And when media empires crumble, we must prepare others to
fill the void.���
BlackCommentator.com Executive
Editor, David A. Love, JD is a journalist and human rights
advocate based in Philadelphia, is
a graduate of Harvard College and
the University of Pennsylvania
Law School. and a contributor to The Huffington
Post, the Grio, The Progressive
Media Project, McClatchy-Tribune News Service, In These Times and Philadelphia Independent Media Center. He also blogs at davidalove.com, NewsOne, Daily
Kos, and Open Salon. Click here to contact Mr. Love.�
|