Note:
BlackCommentator.com welcomes Sharon Kyle, JD,
to the Editorial Board. Her column The Invisible Woman
will appear on a regular basis.
This
month Sarah Palin, her family, and entourage took a road
trip around the country - dubbed the “One Nation” bus
tour. The trip appears to be part family vacation and
part political tour but Palin insists it is not part of
a political campaign.
As
expected, the media has had a front row seat - all along
the way, following Palin and serving up Sarah's pearls
of wisdom on cable and nightly news. There seems to be
a camera and a microphone at the ready, every time the
bus door opens and Palin opens her mouth.
There
also seems to be no end to her willingness to put her
lack of knowledge on display. But apparently there is
a market for all things "Sarah" - which explains
the media's behavior. They cover her, the public eats
it up, they make money, she makes money. No harm, no foul.
Well,
not quite.
One
of Palin's gaffes, made while she was touring Paul Revere's
home in Boston, has gotten a lot of attention. Another,
made while she was at Bedloe's Island, home of the Statue
of Liberty, didn't get as much. This attention disparity
is the point of this article. But before I get to that
point, let's talk a little about the two flubs.
If
you missed the Boston gaffe, speaking of Paul Revere's
famed midnight ride, Palin said:
“He
warned the British that they weren't going be taking
away our arms, by ringing those bells, and making sure
as he's riding his horse through town to send those
warning shots and bells that we were going to be secure
and we were going to be free, and we were going to be
armed.”
The
media's been abuzz ever since these words tumbled out
of her mouth. Bill Maher, Stephen Colbert, and gadflies
picked up on her comments and got a lot of laughs.
Deservedly so. It was easy to get mileage out of this
inaccurate, barely coherent, word salad. Anyone with a
sixth grade education could immediately identify the problem(s)
with her statement.
But
what about the other gaffe - the one Palin made in explaining
the symbolism of the Statue of Liberty. Why didn't that
one grab the attention of Maher and company or the rest
of the media? Could it be that the flaw in that flub wasn't
as easily recognizable? I don't know. Perhaps you can
be the judge. Let's take a look at what Palin said and
compare her statement to documented history.
When
asked about the symbolism of the Statue of Liberty, Palin
said,
“It
is, of course, the symbol for Americans to be reminded
of other countries because this was gifted us, of course
by the French—other countries warning us to never make
the mistakes that some of them had made.”
Okay,
so Palin is saying that France gave us the statue to warn
us not to make the mistakes they made. But contrary to
Sarah Palin's characterization, historians say the Statue
of Liberty was meant to serve an entirely different purpose.
It
was given to us to serve as a reminder of the importance
of liberty, particularly with respect to slavery.
In
other words, the creator of the Statue of Liberty intended
the opposite of what Palin claims. The symbolism was intended
to celebrate freedom and to also acknowledge a mistake
the United States made and corrected - slavery.
It
is well documented that Frederic Bartholdi, the French
sculptor who designed the Statue, came upon the idea of
the statue in 1865 after having a conversation with a
friend, noted Frenchmen Edouard de Laboulaye, who was
an ardent supporter of the Union in the American Civil
War.
Due
to the political climate in France at the time and a lack
of funding, it took several years to raise enough funds
to get the project off the ground. Bartholdi's original
rendering had Lady Liberty holding broken chains in her
left hand, with more broken chains at her feet both to
symbolize the end of slavery in the United States. Slavery
was abolished in France many years before the slaves were
emancipated in the United States.
Noted
author and lecturer, Dr. Joy DeGruy,
frequently addresses the chains in the original renderings
of the Statue of Liberty in her speaking tours and interviews.
DeGruy says that when the renderings were disclosed to
the American decision makers of the day, the French designer
was rebuffed. The Americans insisted that he remove the
chains. Bartholdi was adamant that the chains remain although
he eventually was forced to compromise - removing the
chains from Lady Liberty's hand but leaving the chains
at her feet along with broken shackles, where they remain
today.
Interviewed
on the cable show "Like It Is", DeGruy explained
where the chains are and how they can be seen today. It
is no longer surprising to hear that Sarah Palin doesn't
have the facts but what is more unfortunate is that this
story isn't told as often as the story of Paul Revere's
midnight ride. The shameful history and legacy of slavery,
to this day, is not given the attention it deserves else
Maher, Colbert, and company could have had a field day
with this.
If
only DeGruy could get one tenth the media coverage Palin
gets. In the video below, she addresses the chains on
the Statue of Liberty at 40 seconds into the recording.
She's a great storyteller and author. Here is a link to
her
website. Enjoy the video (below) and please pass this
along to your friends and family.
BlackCommentator.com Editorial Board Member and Columnist Sharon Kyle, JD, is the Co-Founder and Publisher
of theLA Progressivean online social justice magazine. With her husband Dick,
she publishes several other print and online newsletters
on political and social justice issues. In addition to
her work with the LA Progressive, Ms. Kyle holds a Juris
Doctorate, is an adjunct professor at Peoples College
of Law in Los Angeles, and sits on the board of the ACLU
Pasadena/Foothills Chapter and the Progressive Caucus
of the California Democratic Party.Clickhereto contact the LA Progressive andMs.
Kyle.
e-Mail re-print notice
If you send
us an emaill message we may publish all or part
of it, unless you tell us it is not for publication.
You may also request that we withhold your name.