In
most American newspapers and on television and radio outlets
(with the exception of a number of small-circulation magazines),
the idea that corporations and the wealthy in the U.S.
should pay their fair share of taxes is a tough one to get
off the ground.
The
vast majority of Americans are bombarded with propaganda
that tells them the rich pay their fair share and that giving
ever more money to them through tax breaks and subsidies
will provide the jobs that are desperately needed by millions
of workers.
Nothing
could be further from the truth. There is no good evidence
from any economists or economic schools that giving the
store away to the rich will provide a single job. They generally
do not invest in enterprises that will result in jobs, unless
those jobs are created in other countries - the places where
they have sent our factories. That doesn�t help the workers
in this country and has not done so for more than 40 years.
We
know by now, from information given out by people across
the political and economic spectrum that there is a disparity
in wealth, between the wealthiest 1 percent and the rest
of us, which has not existed in nearly a century. That kind
of disparity literally makes for a sick society.
Poor
people do not get the medical care they need. They do not
get to educate their children as they should be educated.
They live in houses that are substandard and neighborhoods
that are not good or are deteriorating. They do not eat
well and their children do not eat well. All together, that
makes for people who are unhealthy. They get sick and they
stay sick. When the society ignores them, it too becomes
sick. Without getting too much into the public health implications
of these conditions, this puts us in a dangerous situation,
as a society and as a nation.
Economic
and political analysts and even some rich people have pointed
out that such conditions could be construed as class warfare.
That is, the wealthy and Corporate America have gathered
to themselves the fat of the land, the wealth that is produced
by the American system. Important to this gathering, of
course, is the �globalized economy.�
It
may be an unusual thing for Americans to hear, but one of
the country�s richest men, Warren Buffett, said of this
modern era, �There�s class warfare, all right, but it�s
my class, the rich class, that�s making war, and we�re winning.�
This, he told Ben Stein, who included it in a column in
the New York Times. No one has to tell 20 million
unemployed or underemployed workers that there is a class
war going on, but they never would know it to read their
newspapers and watch television news (forget radio �news�).
Everything�s fine, they are told by the newsreaders and
pundits�and there is no class war.
Also,
he said, according to the online Brainy Quotes, �If anything,
taxes for the lower and middle class and maybe even the
upper middle class should even probably be cut further.
But I think that people at the high end, people like myself,
should be paying a lot more in taxes. We have it better
than we�ve ever had it.� Not many of the wealthy 1 percent
have been so candid. In fact, to read the papers and to
hear pundits on television or to listen to the AM radio
chatterers, it is as if Buffett never said such things.
Ignoring
the class war in America is as American
as�the class war! Economic issues are reported upon and
discussed in the largest and most important papers, as well
as the small town papers in which stories about potholes,
sidewalks, school taxes, and little corruptions are the
order of most days. But, when anyone points out the despair
of the working class and suggests that a little more in
taxes from the rich would ease the pain somewhat, the messenger
is charged with fomenting class warfare. And the charges
of class warfare against workers and the poor come from
all quarters: national politicians, CEOs, the media, even
some professors, and especially Republicans and their Tea
Party fringe.
Just
this week, The Daily Gazette, the paper in the �hometown�
of General Electric, Schenectady, N.Y., ran a headline
on the editorial page, �Obama�s distorted vision.� In the
editorial, President Obama�s call for more taxes on the
rich was described in this way: �His vision of a government
taking ever more from its productive citizens, then acting
as a kind of national conscience and clearinghouse that
decides who should get the spoils, left us chilled��
The
�Schenectady works� is where Thomas Edison and Charles P.
Steinmetz and so many others did their work and created
their electrical inventions and where, at one time, GE had
some 40,000 workers, including engineers, researchers, machinists,
and line workers in their factories. Today, 90 percent of
those workers are gone and GE has moved most of its production
to other countries. In the minds of the bigwigs in Corporate
America everywhere, the present economic condition of Schenectady is not the fault of GE. It�s merely
�the way things are.� First, they followed the cheap labor,
and then they followed the customers (think India
and China).
The flight of GE might be considered the last local battle
in class warfare that the workers of Schenectady
lost.
So,
The Daily Gazette, perhaps choosing not to offend
the memory of the once - great GE �works� of their fair
city, didn�t even want to use their own words in criticizing
Obama. Rather, they reprinted the editorial from The
Lima News (Ohio). The conclusion of the editorial: �Obama is correct that there
are two competing visions for the future of the nation.
One
is born of our nation�s founders and that honors individual
achievement and prosperity. The other extorts from it.�
This
nonsense could be taken directly from a Tea Party newsletter,
if there were such a thing. But then, Ohio
is one of the states where the new Republican governor,
John Kasich, recently made his the most populous state to
enact anti - public worker legislation that curbs collective
bargaining rights and curbs strikes for some 360,000 workers.
The attack on workers and their unions continues, nationwide.
Both
Schenectady and Ohio
were once industrial powerhouses and the instruments that
led to their prosperity were the unions. The collective
bargaining rights that were gained by federal law and the
strong unions of highly skilled workers that resulted, made
the communities thrive because workers spent their money
right away, right at home. It appears that neither Schenectady
nor Ohio even
know what made them successful. They certainly don�t know
why they are in deep trouble. Right now, considering their
economic and financial condition, they need scapegoats,
so they have picked public workers and their unions. In
doing so, they have joined with all of those who blame workers
for the nation�s economic woes.
Most
people who can read or afford a television set have to know
that if America is near bankruptcy (don�t look at the
stock markets, but at the condition of the people), it is
not the fault of workers, children, the elderly, people
of color, immigrants, or the disabled. It is the fault of
those who have drained too much from the public purse into
their own offshore accounts and they should pay more
taxes.
A
few of the more candid of the rich, like Buffett, know that
there is a class war. They know who started it and they
know who is winning it. The newspapers and newsreaders on
television can�t seem to express the reality of it. They
need a refresher course on Reporting 101.
BlackCommentator.com Columnist, John Funiciello, is a labor
organizer and former union organizer. His union work started
when he became a local president of The Newspaper Guild
in the early 1970s. He was a reporter for 14 years for newspapers
in New
York State. In addition to labor work, he
is organizing family farmers as they struggle to stay on
the land under enormous pressure from factory food producers
and land developers. Click here
to contact Mr. Funiciello.
|