Mar 10, 2011 - Issue 417 |
|||||
|
|||||
Destroying Unions
|
|||||
In
attempting to destroy union rights, Republicans, Tea Partiers, and others,
not surprisingly, are taking a dangerous course that subverts democratic
rights in In turn, such actions by the nation’s Rightists will make democracy itself something that we will study as a historical oddity, rather than enjoying it as a reality in 2011. What has been
happening for weeks in It’s not just
a battle over collective bargaining rights, although that’s what These are two vital parts to extending democracy in the workplace at stake, the right to collectively bargain a contract and seniority. Employers going back to the Robber Barons have wanted to eliminate unions, but The Great Depression 80 years ago gave impetus to President Franklin Roosevelt’s proposal to give workers the right to organize. For the laws passed on his watch to empower workers, he was called a traitor to his class. The laws were passed in the mid-1930s and despite the attempts to have the U.S. Supreme Court declare the laws unconstitutional, they survived every assault that the rich could muster against them. Since then, workers have had the right to organize, but it has been made difficult to nearly impossible to express that right and form unions. Since a half-century before those labor laws were passed, the rich never stopped trying to find ways to subvert the rights of workers to negotiate their pay, working conditions, benefits, and pensions. They merely redoubled their efforts after 1935 and they have had considerable success. How to convince the average American wageworker that unions are not good for him or her? It didn’t take long for right-wing think tanks to be created and funded by the millionaires and billionaires in the 20th Century. For most of the last century, they have been pumping out the propaganda in newspapers, on television and radio, in the classroom, and in the workplace: “Corporations good. Unions bad.” In 1896, Jay Gould,
when confronted by some of his railroad workers who might go on strike,
uttered his famous vision of American workers: “I can hire one-half the
working class to kill the other half.” Such has been the vision of those
who would destroy labor unions and the struggles of workers for equity
and a decent standard of living, ever since. The modern proponents of
this “destroy the workers” mentality, like Scott Walker in As we’ve seen, the propaganda works. Many of the people bused in for a counter rally to the continuing demonstrations of public workers in Madison are working people, themselves, as are many in the Tea Party. There were some 700 of them in the past few days, but their presence was facilitated by Americans for Prosperity, a group that is financed largely by the Koch brothers and others. Spontaneous, it was not. Rather, in other similar circumstances around the country, they represent Gould’ one-half. They need to wake up to the reality that they have nothing in common with the rich who are bankrolling them, and everything in common with other American workers, especially unionized workers. On the East Coast,
the mayor of This is happening around the country. The assault on teachers unions has been a priority for the Right for many years. They apparently feel that this is the time to go for it. It is not just collective bargaining and seniority that the Right is after; it is grievance procedures in union contracts and the security of a contract. It is claimed that it is too difficult to get rid of bad teachers, but there are ways to do it and it could be made less difficult if the school boards negotiated with the teachers unions to make the changes. But in good times, when there is (was) plenty of money, no one seemed to want to tackle the problem, so they just let it ride…until now, when there is much less money. Now that school districts are in the hole for millions, they will make use of the crisis to destroy the unions, not solve the problems. This has been an unspoken goal of long standing for groups like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers, the Business Roundtable, and the right-wing think tanks like the Cato Institute, the Right to Work (for less) Committee, the Manhattan Institute, the Heritage Foundation, the American Enterprise Institute, the American Conservative Union, the Federalist Society, and many more like them. That’s what they
are doing. In What they’re saying, without saying it, however, is that younger teachers work cheaper and, thus, save the district money. It’s easy to see that eliminating seniority is merely an economic sleight-of-hand to get rid of teachers who have been around longer and “cost” more money. Elimination of seniority is destruction of the union contract. Those who have ever worked for wages (railroad section hand or teacher) know what favoritism is. They also know the meaning of nepotism and what “kissing up to the boss” means. Eventually, elimination of seniority degenerates into the farthest thing from “meritorious” service or behavior. It’s human nature and that’s why union contracts have seniority clauses, just as they have grievance procedures. All of these things are included in union contracts because they provide protection of the rights of workers. The entire concept of a union contract is to bring a measure of fairness to the workplace and to ensure that workplaces are safe and healthy. What politicians
like Walker, Mike Huckabee (former governor
of They always couch their assault in this manner: “we don’t hate the teachers (substitute any worker), we hate the union.” This is a mantra for those who want, simultaneously, to withhold the right of workers to represent themselves on the job, but want the support and loyalty of those same workers in other ways, including political. Across the country,
workers seem to sense that what is going on in BlackCommentator.com
Columnist,
John
Funiciello, is a
labor organizer and former union organizer. His union work started when
he became a local president of The Newspaper Guild in the early 1970s.
He was a reporter for 14 years for newspapers in
|
|||||
|
|
||||