Cheating
workers out of their just wages is as old as the written
word - and probably older.
As
long as rules have been written down, there have been
instructions about how to treat workers and their work.
Apparently, not everyone was listening, because the lesson
has been told and retold and taught and taught again,
yet workers continue to be shorted in their paychecks
or pay envelopes, and they have been forced or coerced
into working overtime for nothing, or they were not paid
at all.
Now,
it’s called wage theft and some legislators are trying
to make it more difficult to cheat workers out of their
just compensation. It probably will not be eliminated.
Both
houses of the New York State Legislature have passed their
own versions of the “Wage Theft Prevention Act” (WTPA),
which aims to prevent such wage theft by punishing theft
with greater penalties. Right now, any employer who withholds
wages, overtime pay, meals, or other benefits, such as
a day of rest, can virtually get away with criminal behavior
because the usual penalty is that the lost wages be paid.
As
the end of 2010 nears, both the Senate and Assembly have
passed their versions of the bill, but they have yet to
reconcile the two versions in preparation for moving the
bill to the governor for his signature. And, since the
legislature continues to have great difficulty tackling
any tough decision-making, it’s appears that the bill
will not be signed into law this session.
The
bill not only will protect individual workers, but it
will have a great impact on their communities, as well.
According to the National Employment Law Project, about
300,000 workers in New
York City are cheated out of $18.4 million each week.
The estimate is that the city loses some $956 million
each year from the stolen wages.
Workers
spend their money in the city, right in their neighborhoods
most of the time, while the employers who have stolen
the wages spend it on Wall Street, in some warm island
hideaway, or in some mountain retreat on the other side
of the country or on some other continent.
That’s
a great loss to the city and there are many thousands
of workers in other parts of New York who suffer the same indignity. The WTPA
will help those individuals and their communities. The
same thing is repeated, state after state, community after
community.
It’s
good that people of faith are working with unions and
the labor movement to help right this wrong. In the past
few years, Interfaith Worker Justice has made wage theft
a primary concern in their list of issues.
The
practice is so old that there are many references to mistreatment
of workers and the theft of their just compensation in
the Old Testament and the New Testament.
For
example, in James 5: 4, it warns: “Look! The wages you
failed to pay the workmen who mowed your fields are crying
out against you. The cries of the harvesters have reached
the ears of the Lord Almighty.” And, another even warns
against cheating work animals out of their just portion
of the harvest: In Deuteronomy 25: 4, “You shall not muzzle
an ox when it is treading out grain.”
Of
course, these instructions use the agricultural analogy
because, until the last 100 years, the majority of the
population of most countries throughout history was engaged
directly or indirectly in farming or the selling of agricultural
goods. But the analogy holds right up to our times of
computerization and information technology. It doesn’t
make any difference what the work is; the worker should
be paid promptly for work done.
Opponents
of the WTPA can ask why New
York or any other state needs more of a law than the Fair
Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which provided for a federal
minimum wage. It also allowed a higher wage standard to
be set by the states, which is why some states have a
minimum wage higher than the federal wage. But the FLSA
provides little penalty for those who steal wages.
Wage
theft is more difficult when workers are represented by
a union. The union would file a grievance if the member
were not paid what was provided in the contract. But many
workers, particularly low-wage workers, in some of the
toughest jobs around, are vulnerable. Food service workers,
nursing home aides, home health aides (especially those
who work for private contractors), farm workers, and those
in meatpacking industries, and other food processing industries
are vulnerable.
Many
of these workers, especially in the past few decades,
are at a disadvantage because their first language is
not English. The WTPA provides that the pay structure
must be explained in both English and the primary language
of the workers at the time of hire. Even so, they are
vulnerable because they fear that, if they complain, they
might lose their jobs. To compound the problem, many are
not documented and they fear many things in their new
country, wage theft sometimes being among the lesser fears.
A
worker in New York City told a Daily News columnist
earlier this year that his employer promised to pay him
$600 for working six 12-hour days, which he did. That
comes out to $8.33 an hour, but when he was paid, he got
$300, which is just half the promised pay and it is far
below the minimum wage and certainly not enough to provide
a decent living. That’s
wage theft, and a typical example of it.
Those
on the right, who oppose the WTPA and voted against it,
may be doing so precisely because many of the victimized
workers are undocumented. They can say and have said as
much - that the undocumented don’t deserve the protection
of U.S. laws. Fortunately, their
position is not the majority position. If it were, the
ideal America would be even further
beyond our reach as a nation of workers. America needs a federal version
of the WTPA, not the piecemeal, state-by-state effort
that it seems to be.
A
major problem remains in putting the law into effect:
If we can’t investigate the rampant theft of wages and
benefits under the laws as they exist, how are we to enforce
the new law in a time of cutbacks, slashing of budgets,
and the sharp reductions in staffing for agencies such
as the Department of Labor?
What
should accompany passage of the WTPA is a plan to use
the dwindling resources of state government to ensure
that workers are paid their just wages, because without
enough staff, the Labor Department will not be able to
do proper enforcement and follow up on worker complaints.
Employers
who steal from their workers could take the position with
WTPA that they did before: Because of the government’s
lack of investigative staff, they’ll just take the chance
that they won’t ever get caught. Punishment may be a little
more costly now, but there is a good chance that they’ll
never get caught.
Issues
like wage theft are a clear indication why there is such
a cacophony from the right for “smaller government.” They
do not want any protection for the most vulnerable workers.
They must be opposed on this issue.
BlackCommentator.com
Editorial Board member Carl Bloice is a writer in San Francisco, a member of the
National Coordinating Committee of
the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism
and formerly worked for a healthcare union. Click here
to contact Mr. Bloice.