This
week Lady Gaga joined a rally in Maine to send a message
to the state's two moderate Republican senators, Susan Collins
and Olympia Snowe, asking them to vote to repeal "Don’t
ask, don’t tell (DADT " this week.
But
to no one's surprise Senate Republicans rejected it. Democrats
needed only 60 votes to overcome a filibuster; the vote,
however, was 56 to 43.
The
question our lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer
(LGBTQ) servicemembers should be asking is whether this
week’s vote was a sincere act on the Democrats’ part to
repeal DADT.
Or
was it merely pressure? Posturing? Or, both?
While
I realize that the Obama administration is hoping to avoid
the missteps of the Clinton administration when it tried
to open military ranks to LGBTQ servicemembers, the Democrats
knew they didn’t have the 60 votes needed even if Republican
senators, Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, voted as Democrats
had hoped.
And
with midterm elections now six weeks away, and Republican
and Democratic candidates revving up their campaigns, playing
to their bases, concerns about taxes and the economy, did
Democrats really expect or want or even care what the outcome
on DADT would be this week?
This
week’s vote is another blow for the LGBTQ community concerning
DADT.
I
think the Democrats are disingenuous in their repeal position
on the issue.
While
the LGBTQ community now waits for the Pentagon to completed
its study by December 1, reviewing how to maintain the military’s
“unit cohesion” while integrating LGBTQ servicemembers,
let’s not forget, that as long as DADT is active it gravely
impacts recruitment, morale and unit cohesion because it’s
approves the firing of our LGBTQ servicemembers. And, to
date, more than 13,500 LGBTQ servicemembers have been discharged
under this discriminatory policy, and the number continues
to grow.
Lady
Gaga stated at Maine’s rally:
“Doesn't
it seem to be that "don't ask, don't tell" is
backwards? …we're penalizing the wrong soldier… we gay
soldiers, who harbor no hatred, no prejudice, no phobia,
we're sent home? I am here today because I would like
to propose a new law; a law that sends home the soldier
that has the problem. Our new law is called "if you
don't like it, go home,”
Supporters
of lifting the ban argue that allowing LGBTQ servicemembers
to serve openly would improve the military because it would
draw tens of thousands of additional recruits. And government
reports have shown that many of our LGBTQ servicemembers
who have been discharged under DADT had critical skills,
such as foreign-language proficiency, that are in great
demand for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
And
just last week a surprise Twitter feed of "One Man,
One Woman," a group that describes itself as "working
to preserve, protect, and defend the institution of marriage
between a man and a woman," wrote, "There is no
need to prohibit gays and lesbians from openly serving in
the Armed Forces. They should have the opportunity to serve."
Had
Lady Gaga’s logic prevailed before the Senate vote our U.S.
military today would be less likely to loss another willing
and patriotic servicemember because of his or her sexual
orientation.
But
with attitudes like Tony Perkins, president of the Washington,
D.C.-based Family Research Council (FRC), a conservative
Christian organization promoting “traditional
family values” DADT will continue to be a political pawn
for anti-gay Christian conservatives who see this issue
of LGBTQ in the military as a religious one and not as a
civil rights issue.
"If
the Senate fast-tracks the process, it would short-circuit
the military's review of any potential fallout from the
change. While the majority of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
have made it clear that such an assessment is necessary,
but part of the rush can be blamed on the November elections.
The rest can be pinned on an angry homosexual base, whose
groups like GetEQUAL have been filling Senate offices with
fliers that say, "You're next! We demand 'Don't Ask,
Don't Tell' be repealed now or you will become a target
for non-violent direct action," Perkins wrote on FRC’s
blog.
However,
there are many LGBTQ servicemembers who believe these present
anti-gay attitudes will change.
For
example, Margarethe Cammermeyer a lesbian and former chief
nurse for the Washington State National Guard, awardee of
the Bronze Star for her service in Vietnam, and author of
“Servicing in Silence” is optimistic about the military.
She believes that by 2027, the military will look very different,
because sexual tension, sexual misconduct, and the treatment
of LGBTQ servicemembers will be resolved. Cammermeyer also
believes that “the Uniform Code of Military Justice will
be revised to reflect social mores and the reality of human
sexuality. The result will be a pragmatic document that
will preserve individual privacy, and consensual conduct
will be considered a private matter.”
I
commend Cammermeyer optimism, but 2027 is a long way off.
The anti-gay attitudes of Republicans must be squelched,
and the political posturing of Democrats, supposedly acting
on behalf of LGBTQ servicemembers, must be called out.
For
many in the LGBTQ community, we are anxious about the repeal
of DADT coming to fruition, hoping for the President and
his administration to effect real and substantive change
on our behalf.
And
given the political climate now, could Obama have done something
sooner to repeal DADT?
I
think so.
For
example, in 2008, as a campaign promise to LGBTQ voters,
Senator Obama empathetically stated he would repeal the
discriminatory policy; he campaigned on a full repeal of
the law. Soon after Obama’s inauguration in 2009, the LGBTQ
community waited anxiously to hear that steps were being
made to repeal DADT. But on June 8 of that year when the
Supreme Court refused to review the Pentagon policy that
prohibits LGBTQ servicemembers to serve openly in the military,
Obama’s people added salt to the wounds of our LGBTQ servicemembers
by stating in court papers that the ruling on DADT was correct
because of the military’s legitimate concern of LGBTQ servicemembers
endangering "unit cohesion" -- a concept totally
debunked by a 2002 study.
Studies
have been done over and over, showing that LGBTQ servicemembers
do NOT harm “unit cohesion.” Enough is enough! And it’s
time for action.
And
that action is for President Obama to issue an Executive
Order on behalf on LGBTQ servicemembers.
President
Franklin D. Roosevelt issued an executive order banning
racial discrimination in defense industries and the government
President
Harry Truman issued Executive Order No. 9981 to provide
full integration of African Americans in the armed services.
And the executive order provided for "equality of treatment
and opportunity in the armed forces without regard to race,
color, religion, or national origin."
The
volleying back and forth on DADT can come to an end simply
by Obama using his presidential pen and single-handedly
signing an executive order.
That
is, of course, if he really wants to.
BlackCommentator.com Editorial Board member, the Rev. Irene Monroe, is a
religion columnist, theologian, and public speaker. She is the Coordinator of theAfrican-American Roundtable of the Center for Lesbian and Gay Studies in Religion
and Ministry (CLGS) at the Pacific School of Religion. A native of Brooklyn, Rev. Monroe is a graduate from Wellesley
College and Union Theological Seminary at Columbia University,
and served as a pastor at an African-American church before
coming to Harvard Divinity School for her doctorate as a
Ford Fellow. She was recently named to MSNBC’s list of 10 Black Women You Should Know. Reverend Monroe is the author
of Let Your Light Shine Like a Rainbow Always: Meditations on Bible
Prayers for Not’So’Everyday Moments. As an African-American feminist theologian, she speaks for
a sector of society that is frequently invisible. Her website is irenemonroe.com.
Click here to contact the Rev. Monroe. |