"...
the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today - my own
government."
- Dr. Martin
Luther King, "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence,"
April 4, 1967 at New York City's Riverside Church
"If
we don't have boots in the Iraqi desert by spring, we have to
wait till winter because of the heat," says conventional
wisdom. Don't believe the hype: our soldiers can handle the
heat, but gas and oil prices can't stand the cold. Heavy demand
makes winter fuel prices the highest of the year, and prices
spike when an oil producer like Iraq is attacked. Best to fight
in the spring and summer when prices are low. That's just the
first lesson in the nexus between oil, money, time and the taking
of other people's property by force. As the U.S. government
rushes to invade and occupy Iraq, people around the globe ask
Why, Why now, and Why so alone?
Look all
around you. Plastics, carpets, asphalt, paint, fertilized soil.
Look how electrified our lifestyles. All of it based in oil
and gas. Transportation systems, the glue of our economy, needed
for centralized workplaces and the economic cohesion of our
nation, dependent on oil. Agriculture, pharmaceuticals, a host
of other industries all critically dependent on oil. Globally,
one's personal income is more closely related to the amount
of energy one consumes than to any other factor. Oil is the
most liquid energy, the form most easily transformed to others.
The more oil you use, directly or indirectly, the richer you
are. As the richest country on the planet, U.S. oil consumption
is more than 20 million barrels a day and rising. We produce
less than half those barrels, importing
the rest largely from Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Canada, Venezuela,
Nigeria, and Iraq. Within 20 years, we will import 6.5 barrels out of every 10 we consume.
U.S. oil
production peaked in 1971, enabling OPEC's 1973 oil embargo
and the deep economic recession that resulted. Jimmy Carter
changed our country's policy toward Arab nations in 1980 by
designating the supply of cheap oil from southwest Asia (the
"Middle East") vital to national
security. Our policy in the region quickly evolved to prevent
the rise of a hegemonic power, like Iraq was becoming in 1990,
able to influence use of the region's oil. The world's
oil production will peak this decade, bringing with it a permanent
change in oil market control from those who consume to those
who produce. This change will occur at a time when our economy
is far more dependent on imported oil than it was in the 1970s.
With deep roots in the oil industry, the Bush administration
rightly seeks to diversify our sources of imported oil. Large
oil and gas deposits in the Caspian Sea (circumscribed by Iran,
Russia, and the -stans in central Asia), South America (including
Mexico, Venezuela and Brazil), the South China Sea (circumscribed
by Korea, the Philippines, and Indonesia), and West Africa (primarily
Nigeria, Angola and Gabon) are consequently drawing sober U.S.
interest.
Black Americans
have historic and cultural ties to Africa, as illustrated by
our concern with the continent's poverty and HIV/AIDS rates,
its terms of international trade, and its continuing struggles
against colonialism. Many of us cheered last year when all 53
African states vowed to increase trade and to cross national
boundaries as necessary to implement the mandates of a new African
Union. Few of us know that Africa produces one-seventh of
the oil consumed in the U.S., a figure that will rise to one-quarter
over the next decade. Even fewer know that oil discoveries in
Africa have outpaced those of every other region for several
years. "West Africa's oil has become of national strategic
interest to us," Assistant Secretary of State for African
Affairs Walter Kansteiner declared early last year. "African
oil should be treated as a priority for U.S. post-September
11th security," added Congressman Edward Royce, chair of
the Africa subcommittee in the House of Representatives. Discussions
are ongoing at the highest levels of our government to formally
designate west Africa a region vital to national security. Those
of us with interests in Africa - African Americans, in particular
- must understand the implications of this. With the size of
Africa's
oil exports growing to rival Saudi Arabia's, we must assess
our government's war plans against the U.S. need for oil.
Our country
is the largest consumer of the world's oil, but our economy
is tied to oil in more ways than one. Since the 1940s, oil has
been denominated in U.S. dollars only, making our dollar the
world's preeminent reserve currency. Nations buy and hold dollars
like they buy and hold gold because they can't purchase oil
without dollars. With this support for our currency, U.S. foreign
debt has grown to $2.8 trillion, or $10,000 owed to foreigners
by every man, woman and child in our country. Last year's trade
deficit alone was more than $500 billion and shows no sign of
slowing. Any other country with our lack of fiscal discipline
would see its currency and stock market crash hard. But the
dollar's value is essentially backed by oil, which allows
our Treasury to simply print money as needed to finance our
debt. Since accounting makes no allowance for fiat money, the
General Accounting Office has been unwilling to certify our
nation's financial statements for several years. We can operate
this way only while our dollar is the world's preeminent reserve
currency; without dollar preeminence, there is hell to pay.
Enter the
real "weapon of mass destruction," the
euro. Eleven European countries formed a monetary union
around this currency on January 1, 1999; Britain and Norway,
the major European oil producers, were conspicuously absent.
Due to the strength of European economies, the euro now presents
a serious challenge to the dollar in its role as key reserve
currency. The rise of the euro also threatens to hobble the
British pound's eventual entry into Europe's monetary union.
Britain and the U.S. have mutual interests in oil to match their
interests in the euro. Of the five largest oil companies in
the world, two (ExxonMobil and ChevronTexaco) are U.S.-based,
two (Royal Dutch/Shell and BP) are based in Britain, and one
(TotalFinaElf) is French. U.S. and British oil companies are
all but banned from exploration in Iraq, while French, Russian
and Chinese companies have contracts waiting for the lifting
of sanctions. France and Germany, the largest economies in the
Euro-zone, can diminish U.S. credibility and keep the euro on
track to become the key reserve currency by preventing war with
Iraq.
Under U.S.
and British military attack for the last decade, Iraq has had
its exports restricted to oil through a United Nations oil-for-food
program that deducts war reparations from the receipts. Iraq
has used smugglers to trade its oil for goods and services,
minimizing official oil sales as a way to influence prices and
punish its attackers. Labeling the dollar "the currency
of an enemy state," Iraq
switched its oil denomination to the euro in late 2000,
risking the loss of $270 million to the dollar's strength at
that time vis-à-vis the euro. But the dollar lost 15%
of its value against the euro last year. Iraq's move to the
euro - and Iran's expected move - are placing tremendous pressure
on OPEC countries and other oil producers to drop our dollar
as the main transaction currency for oil. With a looming global
peak in production, consuming nations must switch currencies
when oil-producing states do so. For instance, Jordan began
using euros to buy oil as soon as its major supplier, Iraq,
began using them to sell, and North Korea switched to the euro
late last year to protest the U.S.' halt in fuel aid. Given
the highly leveraged and fragile state of our economy, an OPEC
switch from the dollar to the euro would bring a quick and devastating
dollar and Wall Street crash that would make 1929 look like
a $50 casino bet. Iraq's currency action adds urgency to the
coming oil price and supply crisis, so our leaders have moved
to control both the flow and the currency denomination of oil.
The U.S.
strategy
to destroy OPEC is twofold: pressure non-OPEC producers
to flood the oil market and retain denomination in dollars in
an effort to weaken OPEC's market control, and change the leadership
of any country switching oil denomination from the dollar to
the euro (hence, the "axis of evil"). The strategy
requires that the U.S. military assert our interests in oil
and gas deposits worldwide. U.S. interests in the Caspian Sea
have been secured through regime change in Afghanistan and a
deal for a new pipeline through that country. U.S. interests
in South America, despite the failure of the coup in Venezuela
(an OPEC member), are being secured via military aid to neighboring
Colombia. U.S. interests in southwest Asia are being secured
through the planned invasion of Iraq, then Iran (both OPEC members)
if it switches oil denomination. U.S. interests in the South
China Sea are being secured through military deployments in
the Philippines and off the Korean coast (near OPEC member Indonesia).
But what of West Africa?
While most
African countries import oil from outside the continent, Africa
is a net oil exporter. That's because nearly all African oil
is produced for export to Europe and North America. The vast
majority of foreign direct investment in Africa is in the energy
sector. In the largest project to date, ExxonMobil and ChevronTexaco
have invested $3 billion in a pipeline project to bring Chad's
oil through Cameroon to the west African coast for export; the
oil could flow by the end of this year. Yet the primary goal
of the African Union is economic, political and military integration.
In a nod to the continent's internal needs, ChevronTexaco is
building a gas pipeline from Nigeria to ports in Ghana,
Benin and Togo. Until OPEC lowered production quotas last
year, Nigeria was selling large blocks of oil to South Africa
and Kenya. As the African Union succeeds in integrating the
continent's economies, Africa's oil exports will be turned increasingly
to internal use. Does U.S. policy in Africa mirror our policy
in the Persian Gulf, a policy designed to prevent the rise of
a hegemonic power with influence on the use and denomination
of the region's oil?
Sao Tome
and Principe, an island nation 150 miles off the West African
coast (triangulating Nigeria and Angola), agreed last year to
host
a U.S. naval base in exchange for protection of oil in its
territorial waters. Nigeria has claimed exclusive licensing
rights to an oil block in these waters for many years. The U.S.
base could also be used to protect Cameroon's claims to Bakassi,
the oil-rich island off its coast long claimed by Nigeria. A
new deployment of U.S.
Special Forces to Djibouti, a tiny country bordering Ethiopia,
Eritrea and Somalia, could likewise check national autonomy
in the Horn of Africa. This troop deployment, designed to catch
terrorists in east Africa, adds to the 3,000 French and German
troops already present in the area. Our State Department has
openly threatened Zimbabwe as that country puts its land back
into Black hands. Like accusations levied against Somali "warlords"
a decade ago, President Mugabe is charged with exacerbating
Zimbabwe's famine by distributing food aid only to government
supporters. Our country has numerous opportunities - and perhaps
an incentive - to violate African sovereignty. The upshot is
that African Americans could soon experience repression of the
sort felt lately by our Arab and Muslim brothers and sisters.
What are
we to do? Recognize that Black well being in the U.S. and around
the world will be adversely impacted by our government's war
for oil. Recognize that an oil war, by increasing the costs
of energy, threatens oil-importing developing economies everywhere,
especially those in Africa and South America, as well as Black
America's. Recognize that the war to control the world's oil
is in the late planning stages but is early in its implementation
and can be stopped. Recognize that Martin was killed because
of the moral authority he brought to the Vietnam anti-war movement,
drawn from his use of the "race card," and that the
African American community retains that authority. Recognize
that our ability to drive domestic response to an immoral foreign
policy is what keeps the warmongers up at night. Recognize that
thoughtful Black people, from Nelson
Mandela to your next-door neighbor, are against this war
for two reasons: because it is against Black interests - in
the U.S., in central and South America, in Africa - and because
it is so very terribly wrong. Talk to your friends and family
about your opposition to the war. Stick an anti-war poster in
your yard and a bumper sticker on your car. Join or help organize
a local or national protest. Call, write, email and visit your
congressional representatives. Take a few "sick days"
from work, and don't buy anything you don't absolutely need.
Get behind the anti-war movement now, before it's too late.
We must
also work on root causes with those in other communities. It
may already be too late for a smooth transition from oil dependence
to sustainable energy use, but we must begin now. If we are
sensible, we'll invest in solar and wind technologies, human-powered
and public transportation (bikes and buses), public agriculture,
and other requirements of sustainable communities. We must get
our economic house in order and rebuild our manufacturing base.
"Made in the USA" means we'll have more jobs, even
though they may be difficult and may not pay very well. Our
lifestyles will change dramatically. Our standards of living
will decrease, but the quality of our lives will improve. We'll
be forced to depend more on each other, to communicate more
with each other, to build stronger families and communities.
And just maybe we won't have to kill people to maintain our
economy. We can only suspect that, had the people's will prevailed
in 2000, our president-in-exile would have begun this transition.
On September
20, 2001, President Bush declared, "The war will be fought
not just by soldiers, but by police and intelligence forces,
as well as in financial institutions." Hmmm. War is not
the answer. It's a shortsighted desperation play that is doomed
to failure. Our military forces may take but cannot hold Iraq's
oil, as they have failed to tame Afghanistan's land. Far from
staving off disaster, our arrogance may instead compel OPEC
to "go euro" en masse, taking many oil-consuming
nations with them by force of economics. And a trade war with
Europe will lend the coup de grace to our economy. In
the meantime, many people will be hurt and killed, research
and development on fuel efficiency and renewable energy will
be slowed, the necessary policy and tax initiatives on energy
consumption will be delayed, and our country will be far worse
off when intelligent leadership finally prevails.
Sonja
Ebron is the chief executive of blackEnergy, the place to
practice Black cooperative economics. blackEnergy
brings the benefits of deregulated energy to Black communities
everywhere.
Click
here for a list of sources for further reading on this subject.
www.blackcommentator.com
Your
comments are welcome. Visit the Contact
Us page for E-mail or Feedback.
Click
here to return to the home page
|