July 13, 2006 - Issue 191 |
||
Back | ||
Re-Liberating Zimbabwe by Dwight Kirk Guest Commentator |
||
Printer Friendly Plain Text Format
|
||
Zimbabwe’s President Robert Mugabe now has a new American acronym to
scorn – CBTU. The Coalition of Black Trade Unionists (CBTU)
has launched a major campaign to clip Mr. Mugabe of his “liberator”
image in the African American community by exposing the thuggish actions
of his regime against the Zimbabwean people. CBTU President William Lucy announced that CBTU would aggressively
reach out to African American media, labor websites/blogs and other
progressive media this summer to get Americans “tuned into the Zimbabwe
crisis.” Lucy also said CBTU would join other organizations in demonstrations
at the Zimbabwe Embassy and other locations. It is, indeed, a grim picture in Zimbabwe: 80 percent of Zimbabwe’s workforce is unemployed. 700,000 urban poor and working class people were made homeless a year
ago, when the Mugabe government declared them “rubbish” and destroyed
their property. Fuel and food are scarcer now than ever, with many families living
on one meal or less a day. Over the past the two decades of Mugabe’s rule, life expectancy in
Zimbabwe has plummeted by nearly 20 years – to an almost unimaginable
level of 37 years for men and 34 years for women. Lucy, who is also international secretary-treasurer of the 1.4 million-member
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME),
said “Mr. Mugabe must not get a ‘free pass’ from the black press, allowing
the public to remain comfortable with inhumanity at a distance.” Lucy
continued, “CBTU will not be a silent witness to this tragedy unfolding
on distant soil liberated by heroic freedom fighters. Zimbabwe’s people,
who are suffering crushing poverty, homelessness, hunger and rampant
violations of human and trade union rights, need to know that their
cries for help echo in our hearts, no less than those of our sisters
and brothers in South Africa who prevailed over the racist apartheid
regime.” [Lucy was one of the founders of the Free South Africa Movement in
the 1980s, which conducted the most effective grassroots anti-apartheid
campaign in the U.S. He was also instrumental in raising a quarter-of-a-million
dollars from American unions to finance Nelson Mandela’s historic trip
to the U.S. in 1990.] In the 1960s Mugabe became an icon of the Zimbabwe nationalist movement
that fought white-minority rule and won independence in 1979. However,
his Zimbabwe African National Union (ZANU) party has tightened its autocratic
grip on power as Mugabe’s support in urban areas has drastically waned.
In 2002, he was reelected in a vote marked by government intimidation
of the opposition, a crackdown on the free press, and charges of vote
rigging. Revered African figures have condemned Mugabe’s betrayal of democracy
in Zimbabwe. South African Archbishop Desmond
Tutu has called Mugabe a “caricature of an African dictator.” Pulitzer
Prize writer Wole
Soyinka has called Mugabe’s regime “a disgrace to the [African]
continent.” Mugabe’s descent from icon to despot is wrenching for many black Americans.
In the 1960s, a lot of black activists here gave money and raised clenched
fists in solidarity with Zimbabwe’s liberation fighters. Jos Williams,
president of the Washington, D.C. central labor council, recently returned
from a visit to Zimbabwe with a verdict on Mugabe’s leadership. “He [Mugabe] has lost touch with the people,” Williams said. “In the
past ten years Mugabe has become a totally different person.” Williams,
who represented the AFL-CIO at the 25th
anniversary convention of the Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions
in May, said “Workers there [Zimbabwe] find it hard to accept that many
of them are being beaten, arrested and harassed by the same people that
they marched with 25 years ago for [Zimbabwe’s] liberation.” Mugabe’s hand of repression greeted Williams when he arrived at the
airport in Harare. “There were about 20 other labor organizations that
sent representatives to the ZCTU convention,” Williams said. “But when
we arrived at Zimbabwe’s airport, 11 delegates were denied admission
and sent back home by the government, apparently because they had been
critical of past actions taken by Mugabe.” To squelch growing dissent from the displaced urban poor, the trade
unions, and farmers whose lands have been confiscated by the military,
Mugabe has virtually strangled democracy in Zimbabwe. Barely two months
ago, police officers raided the headquarters of the Zimbabwe Congress
of Trade Unions. They ransacked the accounts department under the pretense
of searching for documents relating to foreign currency transactions
and fraud allegations. Union officials believe this attack was designed
to remove the current union leadership ahead of the annual meeting last
month of the International Labor Organization, which has repeatedly
cited the Mugabe regime for violating ILO
conventions on freedom of association. The government’s campaign to destabilize ZCTU also includes mass arrests,
death threats, and bogus investigations; the threat of imprisonment
of leaders; the use of provocateurs to disrupt ZCTU meetings; and the
creation of splinter unions to undermine and weaken ZCTU. Government
thugs have even assaulted leaders of ZCTU’s Women’s
Advisory Council, injuring one woman so badly that she had to be
taken to a clinic for x-rays. ZCTU Secretary General Wellington Chibebe says he has been detained “many times” by the government, targeted for beatings, tortured and received death threats. Chibebe spoke at CBTU’s 35th anniversary convention in Orlando, Florida in May. He told the 1,500 delegates, “It is one thing to be independent. It
is another to be free. We are still fighting for our freedom in Zimbabwe.”
The audience responded with a chorus of “Amen’s’” when Chibebe added,
“Oppression is oppression, whether by a white person or a black person.”
He concluded his remarks by saying, “We did not fight to free one person
or one class. We fought to free Zimbabwe. We are fighting now against
the system [of oppression], not President Mugabe.” Chibebe thanked CBTU
for adopting a strong resolution that condemned the actions of the Zimbabwe
government while pledging CBTU’s continued support of the Zimbabwe labor
movement. Lucy, who sits on the powerful AFL-CIO Executive Council, said CBTU’s
Zimbabwe resolution and its invitation to Chibebe to speak to thousands
of black workers from every sector of organized labor in the U.S. “upped
the ante on Zimbabwe.” He added, “It’s time we – in the labor movement
and in the African American community – said ‘Enough is enough: Hands
off the workers movement in Zimbabwe!’ Bring back peace and democracy
in Zimbabwe.” Jos Williams echoed Lucy’s call to action, saying “We must peel the
veil from Mugabe’s regime and then be prepared to fully support our
sisters and brothers in Zimbabwe, who, sadly, must liberate their country
– again.” Lucy, who is Vice President of Public Services International, the global
union federation representing 20 million public sector workers in 160
countries, said CBTU had informed leaders of the Zimbabwe Congress of
Trade Unions that CBTU would welcome an invitation to lead a delegation
of Americans to that country to evaluate the situation on the ground.
CBTU’s campaign to raise public awareness about the Zimbabwe crisis
also includes:
With 1 of every 7 black workers belonging to a union, CBTU is one of the most
powerful African American voices for workers’ equity and social justice
around the world. Its 60 chapters, including one in Ontario, Canada,
give CBTU a strong grassroots network to galvanize black public opinion
on Zimbabwe. Still, the crisis in Zimbabwe isn’t tailored for easy soundbites. It
hasn’t erupted into ghastly images on corporate news programs. No 60 Minutes, No Anderson Cooper. No Tavis Smiley. It’s not New Orleans or Darfur or Congo – yet. |
||
Back | ||
Your comments are always welcome. Visit the Contact Us page to send e-Mail or Feedback or Click here to send e-Mail to [email protected] e-Mail re-print notice
If you send us an e-Mail message we may publish all or part of it, unless you tell us it is not for publication. You may also request that we withhold your name. Thank you very much for your readership. |