In BC's April
6 Think Piece "Race, Place and Freedom", Professor Paul
Street recounted what he called his most depressing classroom experience.
"It took place in the tragic aftermath of
what I sometimes call 'Tropical Storm and Societal Failure Katrina.'
Only days before, the nation had been treated to a series of
graphic televised images displaying poor and black New Orleans residents
stuck on the roofs of their flooded homes, begging for assistance...
"As the debate proceeded, it became evident that most of my predominantly
white and suburban Chicago-area students could grasp no compelling
explanation for the terrible scenes on their television than poor
blacks' alleged laziness, stupidity, and self-destructiveness...
"I had run head-first into a 'white discursive' force field composed
of 'dominant white cognitive patterns of structured ignorance' that
made 'the claims of people of color' seem 'absurd and radically incongruent'
with common sense."
Every now and then you run across a simple, elegant unwrapping of
a vexing social reality. Having seen facts, common sense and
morality bounce harmlessly off the "white discursive force field"
again and again, we are all profoundly in Professor Street's debt
for this apt descriptive term. Both the phrase and Street's
experience resonated with BC reader Jerel Shaw:
Paul Street's invocation of the "white-cognitive
wall of indifference and ignorance both intentional and unintentional"
took me back some over 40 years.
I was attending a political science class at a small South Texas college
where the majority of students were white. Mind you, these were
the days where the "Black Power" Movement as well as "Viva
La Raza" had reached a high fever pitch on college campuses across
America. I was the only Black student in that class when the
instructor raised the question of racial injustice.
Of course, I can't remember the exact response I made, but I did declare
that racial injustice was unfair and mean. After saying that
a white student reacted by saying that he was not responsible for
racial injustice, he had been taught this by his parents and their
parents. He said that he should not be blamed for their teachings.
Of course most of the (white) class sympathized with him. My
reply was to admonish my fellow student to take personal responsibility
for what is happening today; "momma and daddy can't speak for
you now."
The point is that this cognitive wall that you speak of is a tough
cookie to break. Whites are quick to say that it happened a
long time ago. At the same time they are unable to own up to
their responsibility to try to short circuit the systemic and structural
racist cycle that his parents and their parents instigated. Katrina
is a good example of how truth can't be hidden. Their laziness, indifference,
and false innocence will be the things that undermine what this nation
supposedly stands for. The sins of the fathers visit.
If the occasional contributions by Professor Street reprinted in
BC aren't enough for you, and they shouldn't be,
visit his regularly updated blog.
Street's 2002 publication, the "Vicious Circle, Race, Prison,
Jobs and Community in Chicago, Illinois and the Nation" remains
an indispensable explication on the effects of racially selective
mass incarceration on family relations, the job market and nearly
every facet of black life in America.
Back in July of 2005 frequent BC contributor Edward
Rhymes began his cover article "Acting
White" thusly:
I have heard a lot of static concerning African
Americans and their supposed disregard for education. “Our black kids
look down on education' say many of the black pundits, 'they tease
the black kids who are doing well school and say they are acting white.”
I've heard this repeated over and over again by African-American
personalities and celebrities (none of which, by the way, have any
extensive, classroom teaching experience). Let me also add, that in
all my years as an educator and youth program specialist, I have never
heard any student equating scholastic achievement with whiteness....
Reader Maria Phillips took the time to write us and disagree with
Dr. Rhymes:
I suggest that Edward Rhymes read the work of Dr.
Signithia Fordham on the phenomenon of "acting white". Her
work demonstrates that this phenomenon is not mere speculation, but
the actual lived experience of a group of students in Washington DC.
In addition, Meyerhoff Scholars at the University of Maryland Baltimore
County have also articulated their academic experience in terms of
the "acting white" phenomenon. I am growing weary of the
industry that is emerging around denial of this phenomenon from non-ethnographic
sources.
This editor has no experience as an academic researcher, classroom
teacher, celebrity or ethnographer. I have been a parent, step
parent and foster parent. I recall a discussion with my own
eighth grade daughter in which I demanded an explanation for her lack
of interest in trying to excel academically.
"I ain't tryin' to be white" she told me.
Eight years later, in 1999 or early 2000 I was the foster parent of
another young lady. Same age, same neighborhood, same Chicago
public school, same conversation, and to my horror the same answer,
almost word for word.
"I ain't even tryin' to be white".
So we respectfully disagree with Dr. Rhymes. It appears to us
that whether we like it or not, the phenomenon does seem to exist.
We can trace its causes and consequences, we can explore how
it came to be and what we can do about it. But like it or not,
it appears to be part of life as it is being lived by some proportion
of young African Americans. So what ARE we going to do
about it?
Georgia's bold state legislators are into taking action on those crucial
issues where the feds in Washington DC fear to tread. Trouble
is, not nearly enough of them are talking about repealing the state's
anti-black voter
ID law which the Bush Justice Department has OK'd anyway. Few
have been heard on the subjects of raising the minimum wage or restricting
usury and predatory lending. And so far, making Wal-Mart pay
its fair
share of Medicaid, which picks up the health care for many of
its employees in the state remains a legislative non-starter.
Since the anti-gay marriage bullet has already been shot, the state's
Republican legislators hoped to rally their forces this time by making
the everyday activities of undocumented immigrants in Georgia into
felonies. BC recently exposed Atlanta state
senator Kasim
Reed, a demagogic attorney who practices employment discrimination
law for discriminating employers and civil rights law for the corporations
that violate civil rights for his echoing Republican strategies with
ridiculously punitive proposals of his own. With or without
Reed's help, Georgia legislators this week did pass their own horrendous
and unenforceable immigration bill, and even produced a fire-eating
black
Republican from suburban Atlanta to address an anti-immigrant
crowd in the capital steps.
Just as white supremacy has engineered complex discursive "force
fields" to insulate whites and some blacks and browns too, from
reality, similar force fields of fake history, of disinforming and
misleading notions have been constructed around the issues of so-called
"free trade" and its consequent globalization of labor markets.
America experiences labor market globalization as a massive
influx of foreign workers, with and without papers. Black America,
already last hired and first fired, experiences the sharp end of this
process in ways that we will be working out for some time.
Hence it is no surprise that BC readers are continuing
to write us about the immigration aspects of the Kasim Reed article,
on Senior Commentator Margaret Kimberley's April
6 offering, "Immigration and America's Bad Karma," and
the April
13 Radio BC: "Immigration Militancy, Black
Malaise."
We got this thought from BC reader Tom Hodges:
Good day Ms. Kimberly. I liked your column, “America's
Bad Karma.” I do think we should consider class warfare vs.
racism as “being the heart of the anti-immigrant backlash.” That was
where Dr. King was headed when he was assassinated. He hit a nerve!
Just a thought.
From Tokyo, Doss Thane channels Republican leaders to tells us this:
Machiavelli that the best way to keep peace at
home is to have a war abroad. So Bill Frist and the House Republicans
– the hard-core right-wingers – have cast the immigration debate in
exactly the same terms: "We've got to build a wall! We've got
to put Them in prison! Rally around the flag and support Us, because
We've got to stop Them before it's too late!”
The craven complicity of the Congressional Black Caucus in smearing
Georgia Rep. Cynthia McKinney was the subject of last week's BC
cover
story, and of a good deal of reader correspondence.
BC reader Marjorie Hammock said:
And thank you for the C. McKinney piece. I
was beginning to think that only I was understanding what was going
on with McKinney. There are very few sisters that I know (and
I am 70 years old) who would not react to some white official hands
on the person.
And we got this from Victor Pate:
Cynthia McKinney is the ONLY individual in the United
States Congress that has represented the honest aspirations of ordinary
African-american people and the majority of the world's population.
And even if many of those people are not aware of her efforts, courage
and honesty, it has not slowed her from the pursuit of justice. But
it has made Rep. McKinney a target. The enemy doesn't fight
fair, and we should not rule out the possibility that her accusers
are lying or that there has been some kind of scripted set-up.
Alice Molloy agrees that McKinney was a target:
I can't stop thinking about what's being done to
Cynthia McKinney. In my opinion, "they" particularly
want to destroy her and I do not doubt for a minute that she was targeted
by Capitol cops. I would guess that such people are trained from birth
to see a woman like her as someone to be arrested and sent to prison.
They probably can't stand that she's a member of Congress, and
believe she needs to be brought down a peg. Black Caucus members
who are piously chastising her ought to be ashamed of themselves,
and white members, like Nancy Pelosi, who it is said won't even talk
to her, need to take a look at where they're coming from. Thanks
for speaking up about this.
Four years ago, BC's very first issue exposed the
connections of Newark mayoral candidate Cory Booker with elements
of the hard right. The plan was to elevate a new, corporate
subservient brand of black leadership into elected office, and use
the city as a showcase for efforts to privatize public education and
what remains of Newark's public sector. Although Booker obtained
the unanimous endorsement of every print and broadcast outlet in the
tri-state area virtually none of them except BC saw
fit to mention Booker's connections to the Walton Family Foundation,
his outspoken advocacy of vouchers and privatization, or his endorsement
by the Manhattan Institute.
Booker is back again this year for another grab at Newark's City Hall.
His right wing connections have raised him more than $6 million
for a campaign in a city with less than 300,000 inhabitants. They
have produced him a feature length propaganda film which makes the
incredible and insulting claim that Newark rejected Booker four years
ago simply because he was fair-skinned and educated. While Booker
remains the recipient of almost universally fawning and uncritical
media praise, BC is happy to report that a whiff
of the actual issues in play may occasionally reach the public through
a most unlikely source: The New York Times.
An April 17 Times
article breaks the establishment media embargo on one of the campaign's
real issues. "Cory Booker...supports school vouchers",
the article says. "Last time his opponents successfully
used the issue against him." With that single sentence,
the article sheds more light on the real issues of Newark's mayoral
campaign than dozens of interviews and puff pieces. The Times
piece barely touches on other pressing concerns Newark residents have
over Cory Booker, such as his connections with the rich and Right,
or the likelihood that City Hall would be a brief stopover on the
way to higher office. And even though it repeats the bogus claim
that growing numbers of African Americans are joining the corporate
funded "voucher movement," we do have to call it progress,
in a minor sort of way.
We try to answer as much of our reader email as possible, and we print
a little of it in this space each week. Do send us your best.
Write to Bruce Dixon at [email protected].
|