The more we learn about Samuel Alito, the worse
he looks. The man who Geo rge Bush wants to replace Sandra Day
O'Connor on the U.S. Supreme Court is clearly a hard, rightwing
activist. That's why Bush nominated him. Recently released memos
from Alito's tenure in the mid-Eighties Reagan administration
prove him to be so.
Alito claims that his memos were just the work of a young lawyer
doing his job for his client, the Reagan government. But he
got the job in the first place by swearing absolute loyalty
to the rightwing cause. In his job application, the young Alito
described himself as a "fierce" conservative, an opponent
of women's right to abortion, and to what he called "racial
quotas." Alito stated baldly that abortion rights were
not covered by the Constitution, and that he would welcome any
opportunity to challenge the Roe ver sus Wade decision. He later
bragged that he was especially pleased with his work on cases
in which he opposed affirmative action. Alito criticized the
Warren Supreme Court, the court that ushered in school desegregation.
Clearly, this judge is an unredeemed, Reaganite reactionary.
He is also profoundly dishonest - which no doubt endeared
him to the Bush men, who universally share this character defect.
So do most of the corporate media, who strain themselves to
find evidence of "moderation" in Alito's record -
evidence that does not exist. If this, the second of George
Bush's appointments to the High Court is allowed to pass, there
can be no doubt that what is left of affirmative action is doomed.
And if Roe versus Wade is overturned - as Alito said two
decades ago that he was eager to do - then the groundwork
will have been laid for a social revolt among women across the
nation.
It is, indeed, ironic that rightwing lawyers who claim to be
against "activist" courts are, in fact, the most activist
of all. It takes great zeal and energy to turn back the hands
of time, but that is what they are determined to do.
Alito is especially attractive to the Bush men at this juncture
in history, when the president is claiming unlimited powers
to do whateve r he chooses in the name of the War on Terror.
Bush places himself above the law, claiming that his role as
Commander-In-Chief in a war he himself proclaimed - and
that will have no end until he un-proclaims it - empowers
him to do whatever he deems necessary to ensure the security
of the nation. Literally, anything. In other words, George Bush
believes that he has the right to rule as a military dictator.
Samuel Alito gives every indication of agreeing with him. Back
in 1984, Alito advised that the U.S. Attorney General should
have blanket immunity from lawsuits in wiretap cases, even if
the wiretaps were illegal. Again, he wants to put the executive
branch of government above the law. What kind of judge is that,
who would enshrine lawlessness at the heights of government?
A George Bush kind of judge, who functions on behalf of Caesar
- which is what Alito wanted the day he applied for a
job with Ronald Reagan. He is a career rightwing activist, seeking
a lifetime job of oppress ing the poor, the female, and the
non-white. For Radio BC, I'm Glen Ford.