Issue 
          Number 14 - October 17, 2002
         
          
           
           
           
           
          Printer 
            Friendly Version
          
        Note: 
          The size of the type may be changed by clicking on view at the top of 
          your browser and selecting "text size". The document will 
          print in the size you select.
        To our great relief, 
          
 
          was spared from commenting on the "Barbershop" furor. Only 
          one reader wrote to us about the movie, and his was a novel contribution 
          to what has been a very shallow debate. 
        Carl Harris' letter 
          made us leery, at first. It was addressed to "Honored influential 
          loving leader," causing heads in our office to swivel, as in, "Where?" 
          We're still not sure if Harris is a skilled satirist, or blessed with 
          the rare quality of sincerity. You decide.
          
         
          "Barbershop" 
            has scenes mentioning Rosa Parks and Dr. Martin Luther King in a manner 
            that some feel is negative. Some suggest editing out those scenes. 
            An alternative synergistic solution exists, and you can influence 
            a positive solution. "EDITING 
            IN" scenes is recommended. I recommend that the film stars create 
            a serious scene emphasizing the importance of registering to vote, 
            voting, and the roles that Rosa Parks and Dr. Martin Luther King played 
            in facilitating voting rights in this free democratic society. After 
            this change, leaders like you can urge potential viewers to "reverse 
            boycott" the movie and seek qualified registrars to "sit 
            in".
          Your ability to 
            influence many is greatly appreciated. Will you please use your many 
            resources to insure that the right people get this message and that 
            action, as you deem appropriate, is taken? Thank you kindly.
        
        Harris provides 
          complete instructions for a "'Barbershop' Reverse Boycott - Sit 
          In Voter Registration Drive Apology," to be undertaken jointly 
          by the movie's producers, writers, and actors, and the "honored 
          influential loving leaders" who are so concerned about the current 
          version of the film.
         
          I believe that 
            it was implied that Rosa Parks was just tired when refusing to give 
            up her seat on the bus in Montgomery, Alabama, an action that lead 
            to the Montgomery Bus Boycott, precipitating many other civil rights 
            actions. I also believe that Martin Luther King's "alleged" 
            philandering was made light of.
          If time is allocated 
            in every showing of "Barbershop" with the cast seriously 
            informing viewers of the power and importance of voting in the United 
            States of America, this could make a very big difference in this democracy, 
            particularly this November. An additional campaign soliciting qualified 
            registrars to "sit in" at every showing of the movie having 
            materials available to register viewers could have a huge impact on 
            the political system in this free and democratic society.
          Far greater than 
            an apology, I recommend that Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Incorporated, Ice 
            Cube and others participating in the movie "EDIT IN" a message 
            for all current showings and future digital video device and 
            video released versions of the movie. This message, asking all viewers, 
            especially the African-American ones, to register to vote and actually 
            get out and vote, communicating that voting is "cool", could 
            reach many. Qualified registrars could "sit in" and potential 
            viewers can be urged to "reverse boycott" the newly edited 
            version of the movie by community leaders like you.
        
        Harris thanks the 
          "leaders" for their "valued time." Harris deserves 
          thanks for his wit, and for providing us with an opening to briefly 
          discuss the "real" Rosa Parks: the fully conscious, never-tired-of-struggle, 
          knew-exactly-what-she-was-doing activist who has been buried in mythology 
          while still alive.
        It served the civil 
          rights movement's purposes to depict Ms. Parks as a kind of "face 
          in the crowd" of racial oppression, just another middle-aged Black 
          woman who one evening decided to sit down and rest her feet with dignity 
          in the "white" section of a bus. The character had great appeal 
          - to white liberals, especially - but it was a fictional character.
        In reality, the 
          Rosa Parks of December 1, 1955 was a veteran mover-and-shaker who stepped 
          on that Montgomery, Alabama bus fully intending to light the fuse of 
          history. 
        We thank Evelyne 
          Laurent-Perrault ([email protected]), 
          Coordinator of Multicultural Programs at Haverford College, for forwarding 
          to us a review of a Penguin Books biography of Rosa Parks, the disciplined 
          and conscious change-maker: 
         
          For example, "while 
            the NAACP executives made dinner speeches and attended national conferences," 
            Parks, as the local NAACP secretary, "balanced the ledgers, kept 
            the books, and recorded every report of racial discrimination that 
            crossed her desk. She also did field research, traveling from towns 
            like Union Springs to cities like Selma to interview African Americans 
            with legal complaints, including some who had witnessed the murders 
            of blacks by whites in rural areas." 
          In 1945, on a 
            trip to a NAACP leadership-training seminar in Jacksonville, Florida, 
            she met and became good friends with Ella Baker, the legendary womanist 
            who in the 1960s encouraged young civil rights activists to organize 
            the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNICK). In the spring 
            of 1955 she refused to go along with a petition drawn up by her closest 
            associates for a partial desegregation of Montgomery buses because 
            she thought it "demeaning" to demand less than outright 
            desegregation. 
          Shortly thereafter, 
            over the objections of Raymond Parks, her beloved barber husband, 
            she decided to take two weeks off from her job at the Montgomery Fair 
            Department Store to learn new techniques for activism at the Highlander 
            Folk School. At Highlander she met Septima Clark who had studied with 
            W.E.B. DuBois at Atlanta University. "Some of her great courage 
            and dignity and wisdom may have rubbed off on me," Parks would 
            say later.
        
        Grace Lee Boggs 
          reviewed "Rosa Parks: A Penguin Life," by Douglas Brinkley. 
          The book details how "black men and especially black preachers 
          were not used to sharing the spotlight with women. So, out of envy, 
          male colleagues like E.D. Nixon and Rev. Ralph Abernathy began making 
          Rosa's life miserable by belittling her and her husband...." 
        It's long past time 
          to shout it loudly and proudly: Rosa Parks was a radical soldier in 
          the struggle long before she sat down on the bus. Perhaps Carl Harris, 
          the originator of the reverse-apology-sit and edit-in, can convince 
          our "honored influential loving leaders" and movie moguls 
          to produce "The Real Rosa Parks" - with voter registrars manning 
          the theater snack bars.
        The price of 
          silence
        At times it seems 
          we can almost hear the roar of approaching war - but little outcry is 
          heard from the national office of the NAACP. Sadu Nanjundiah, a physics 
          teacher at Central Connecticut State University, is more than disappointed 
          with the nation's oldest civil rights organization.
         
          I am a subscriber 
            to Black Commentator and appreciate the views and news of the African-American 
            community. I am sorry that the NAACP has not taken a strong stand 
            against the impending Bush war against Iraq. It is illegitimate and 
            immoral, given the terrible innocent casualties that will result from 
            bombing. When the U.S. Army is sent in, African-American soldiers 
            will be on the front line in great numbers bearing the brunt of any 
            battle. 
          The National Security 
            Adviser, Dr. Rice, is wholly unrepresentative of the feelings in the 
            community. I was aghast when she received the NAACP Image Award recently. 
            Even worse is the silence of the NAACP in face of the targeted attacks 
            against African-American Congressional Representatives like Ms. Cynthia 
            McKinney and Mr. Earl Hilliard.
        
        NAACP officials 
          we have talked to stress that the organization is a non-partisan, democratic, 
          deliberative body that has not had the opportunity to discuss the imminent 
          hostilities at a full meeting of the board. On the syndicated TV program 
          America's Black Forum, NAACP Chairman Julian Bond voiced his personal 
          opposition to a unilateral U.S. first strike against Iraq. "I don't 
          think that a majority of the American people are for that," said 
          Bond, adding, "I speak only for myself."
        NAACP Executive 
          Director Kweisi Mfume, of course, has a long way to go to make up for 
          giving the Image Award to Condoleezza Rice, who is now the African American 
          female image of aggression.
        The organization 
          cannot avoid its responsibilities much longer. "The NAACP can no 
          longer afford to be hypocritically silent as African-Americans are used/recruited 
          to conspicuously perpetrate injustices abroad, as we cry for relief 
          from similar injustices at home," wrote Rev. Curtis Gatewood, president 
          of the Durham branch of the NAACP, in a letter to Mfume.
        Gatewood was reprimanded 
          by the NAACP national office last year for calling upon Blacks to refuse 
          to serve in Afghanistan. At that time, Mfume issued a statement: "This 
          is a time for all Americans to stand united and defend the ideals of 
          a free and open society where terrorism has no place."
        The Durham activist 
          has all but dared Mfume to strip him of his chapter presidency, declaring 
          that the national office's silence is "keeping us side-tracked 
          and artificially united around the flag of patriotism that is deceitfully 
          waved in the clouds of racism.
          I'm saying the NAACP should pick up the banner and be on the front line 
          for world justice, not just American justice." 
        Welcome to The 
          New American Century
        
 
          reader Phil Goldvarg is a poet. In response to our commentary, "Black 
          America and Bush's New World Order," Goldvarg dropped us a line, 
          and wrote a few to George Bush.
         
          Thank you for 
            your strong voice. With respect, I wanted to share this poem with 
            you.
          
        
        In Glen Ford's October 
          3 Letter to the Readers, he drew attention to a report of the Project 
          for a New American Century, entitled "Rebuilding America¹s 
          Defenses," the apparent blueprint for Bush's war-without-end. Jim 
          Thompson, editor of the Jefferson Post, in Jefferson, North Carolina, 
          forwarded his own editorial response to the global war plan.
         
          Is the rush to 
            war against Iraq really about Saddam Hussein - or is that just an 
            excuse to seize control of the second largest oil reserves in the 
            world? Does the Bush Administration plan to turn space into a battleground? 
            Do they really believe the United States should seek to dominate the 
            world by military power? Other nations have tried, and all have failed 
            disastrously. There is no reason to think we would succeed.
          The American people 
            have a right to know the answers to these and other questions. It 
            is the average people who will be asked - or forced - to make the 
            sacrifices to fulfill this nightmare of attempted world domination. 
            The Bush Administration needs to distance itself from The Project¹s 
            imperialism before the rest of world decides we are a rogue nation 
            - and acts accordingly. They might remember the words of Dr. Martin 
            Luther King Jr.: "We must learn to live together as brothers, 
            or we will perish together as fools."
        
        Caesar Howell has 
          a more theatrical take on the players who strut the world stage:
         
          I have noticed 
            a few things concerning the "staged" scenarios that are 
            occurring since last year's events and after the administration had 
            a meeting with the movie industry. Follow me as I connect The Republic 
            and the Star Wars series. It is not so far fetched considering what 
            is happening. In Plato's Republic, the plan for domination is spelled 
            out and following the present path. As for the connection to the Star 
            Wars Saga, the Emperor (George W.) has taken advantage of a situation 
            of danger and exploited it to his advantage (Episode I). Next the 
            Senate (U.S. House of Reps and the UN) are arm-twisted to solve a 
            crisis and give up their better judgment in a battle, real or imagined 
            (Episode II). And as soon as the world gets a little wiser to the 
            global domination and loss of rights, the Emperor plays his card to 
            dissolve the Senate (the U.N. - "You are either with Us, or Against 
            US!").
          Does that sound 
            familiar? If the UN does not capitulate to what the US wants, what 
            do you think will happen?
          Nelson Mandela 
            has spoken about it. What are we doing over here?
        
        David Shaffer-Gottschalk 
          took note of our comments on the public opinion polls, which show that 
          the War Party is made up of "youngish, white, affluent, well educated, 
          churchgoers."
         
          Thank you for 
            that insightful analysis. I happen to be one of those white church-going 
            people, but one who does not support the God of War. You have 
            boldly said in your letter about the Bush administration what I have 
            been trying to say (in vain, I might add) to those around me, and 
            you have said it more eloquently than I have been able to.
        
        Brother Sekou also 
          writes eloquently, yet concisely:
         
          Thank You for 
            your insight, foresight and endarkenment. As a Vietnam Vet, 
            I have learn't my lesson about war, and who is the real terrorist.
        
        And, from Jerry 
          A. Stanley:
         
          You did a great 
            job of presenting the issues in this article. Keep it up!
        
        The Billionaire 
          Trojan Horse
        Bob Johnson may 
          speak for half of the Black billionaires in the U.S., but most 
 
          readers don't appear to think highly of him or BET. In our last issue, 
          we called Johnson "the most powerful Black Trojan Horse in the 
          nation, by virtue of his wealth," and described his ongoing collaboration 
          with the Bush White House on social security and tax issues. Adrienne 
          D. Dixson registered her contempt for the man-called-mogul:
         
          I am appalled 
            and thoroughly disappointed that this man will sell us out 
            for his personal gain. He should be ashamed of himself. As much as 
            I enjoy watching videos on BET (yes, I'll admit to that), I refuse 
            to watch the network anymore. It makes me wonder how much further 
            he will sink? I am saddened that we cannot trust that those who have 
            benefited so much from our loyalty will truly look after the entire 
            community and not just his own.
          Thank you also 
            for providing the links so that reader's can do their own research 
            on Mr. Johnson and his cronies.
        
        Dr. Cecilia Bowie 
          is spreading the word around on Johnson.
         
          Thank you for 
            such an illuminating article on such a deceitful individual. I'll 
            be passing this type of information along to my colleagues. 
 
            continues to be one of the most informative documents ever.
        
        Johnson gathered 
          almost 50 rich African Americans, including a number of Black media 
          manipulators, to endorse elimination of the Estate Tax on the wealthy. 
          Attorney Leroy Wilson, Jr. handles rich people's money, all the time. 
          Wilson knows greed when he sees it.
         
          Since Bob Johnson 
            is one of the wealthiest African-Americans, I wonder how much of his 
            wealth is passed on to charity as a percentage of his net worth, when 
            compared to Bill Gates and Ted Turner? I select these latter two because 
            I know that they have made substantial contributions to worthy charitable 
            causes. Of course, Walter Annenberg's $50 million contribution to 
            UNCF is still unparalleled, I think. 
          The New York Times 
            (910/6/02 at page 33) reports that Mr. Annenberg left half of his 
            fortune to his family, an art collection to the Metropolitan Museum 
            of Art and the rest to charity.
            
            Perhaps if Mr. Johnson and others knew of the estate and income tax 
            advantages that they could get by using charitable giving in their 
            estate planning, they would give some of their wealth away to benefit 
            those who are not members of their immediate families. On the other 
            hand, they may also use the tax laws to make gifts to their families. 
            Bill Gates' father and Warren Buffett spoke out very forcefully on 
            this subject. In fact, they argued that a repeal of the estate tax 
            would cause a lot of charitable giving to dry up. Bob Johnson makes 
            a mistake however, when he characterizes (as I remember) his wealth 
            as being generated by him. He seems to forget that he accumulated 
            his wealth on the backs of the Fannie Lou Hamers, and others, including 
            those who provide the talent for his shows.
        
        Clarke R. Watson 
          rates Johnson as a plague on Black people. Watson also caused pain to 
          the billionaire's pocket.
         
          What you don't 
            understand is that Bob Johnson will eagerly sell out Black folk for 
            a dime.
          Remember, it was 
            his glorifying gangsta' rap that launched his BET career. I had his 
            local cable channel 50, here in Denver, yanked off the air a decade 
            or so ago. He flew all the way out here from DC to chastise me about 
            the 1st Amendment.
          Nevertheless, 
            it stayed off the air. As an African American I think Bob Johnson 
            is as dangerous to our interests as the KKK.
        
        Stewart R. Hubbard 
          wrote far too long, so we told him to shorten it up or accept our edit. 
          This is what was left.
         
          I truly feel that 
            we should not penalize people because they have obtained wealth, whether 
            if they are black or white, or some other race. If people took the 
            opportunity to invest their money wisely, then why should they have 
            to support people through their taxes who do not go out to work? It 
            is not right, regardless if we were all the wealthy people and whites 
            were the poor ones, it would be wrong for them to expect handouts 
            either.
        
        Mr. Hubbard accused 
          
 
          of not understanding economics. 
        Gary Spencer knows 
          all about Bob Johnson's rightwing ways, and seems irritated that we 
          did not detail them all.
         
          You act as though 
            we should expect something better from Bob 
            Johnson. Isn't he the one who assisted in the elevation of "booty-shake" 
            
            with BET all of those years? Isn't he the one who couldn't be bothered 
            
            with any serious African-American cinema during that ownership? Why 
            
            should we expect anything else?
        
        We could have mentioned 
          Johnson's firing of superb commentator Tavis Smiley, his union busting 
          at BET - the list is long. Billionaires can do a lot of damage. We can't 
          afford this one.
        Zimbabwe Guest 
          Commentary response
        Last issue's e-MailBox 
          column featured a headline: "Anglo-Saxons Beware." This did 
          not sit well with Charles B. (Ben) Cranston, a professor at the University 
          of Maryland.
         
          As a white Anglo 
            Saxon of British descent I wonder why I was put onto this mailing 
            list. Up until now I have refrained from complaining because the material 
            was interesting and awareness-raising. However, this quote, which 
            was under the head "Anglo-Saxons beware", is somewhat alarming.
          [Cranston disagrees 
            with 
 
            reader Clifford E. Bell, who wrote.]
          Professors 
            Metzler and Derman are knowingly or unknowingly supporting the psychological 
            warfare, which is anti any/all African programs for SELF Sufficiency. 
            The two 'scholars' are of a western, institutionalized orientation. 
            They are promoting the idea that Anglo Saxons have the right to be 
            on the land [as well as own land] in Africa. The two 'scholars', knowingly 
            or unknowingly, are pro-western, criminal propagandists.
          Given the history 
            of colonialism in Africa I can certainly understand that historical 
            land ownership situations might be considered suspect, however, I 
            draw the line at the assertion that Anglo Saxons might not have the 
            right to own land (assuming it is fairly acquired). To argue otherwise 
            is just reverse racism. I do believe in some form of affirmative action 
            (i.e., just declaring the playing field level and walking away is 
            an insufficient response to historical racism), but to declare differential 
            land ownership rights based on race seems to me to be the wrong remedy.
        
        
 
          replied:
         
           The "Anglo-Saxons 
            Beware" headline was, like many of our headings in the mail section, 
            tongue-in-cheek. One would think that a person of your [British] background 
            would get the wry humor - and we believe you did. You certainly don't 
            write as if you are unduly alarmed.
          On the subject 
            of "reverse racism" - Mr. Bell has no power, and can't enforce 
            any of his pronouncements regarding conditions in Africa. "Racism" 
            has no effect in the absence of power; there is no "reverse" 
            of it in the U.S. as measured against the actual thing, which has 
            killed so many millions. 
          Privilege comes 
            in many forms. The white "farmers" of the former Rhodesia 
            did gain the land by privilege, in relationship to the indigenous 
            population. That must be addressed. Mugabe's cronies shouldn't be 
            privileged, either - although the real soldiers who fought in the 
            bush should be rewarded. They died in many thousands.
        
        In our October 31 
          issue, activist and scholar Dr. Chris Lowe will take yet another look 
          at land tenure in Zimbabwe.
        Keep writing.
        Rosa Parks Book 
          List from the website of the hometown paper of the city she helped make 
          famous.
          http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/1news/specialreports/rosa/120100_rosabooks.htm
        PDF of Project for 
          The New American Century report. 
          http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
          
         
        