A Consumer Racial Profiling complaint
filed in July, 2003, in the Western District of New York against
J.C. Penney by Nakiesha Jones, an African-American woman of Buffalo,
New York, alleges that JCPenney store security personnel Nicholas
A. Goodwin and Paul Meerboth, pursuant to JCPenney policy, engaged
in racial profiling and video surveillance of her for no reason
but for her race, resulting in her being falsely arrested and
charged with shoplifting.
Finding herself charged with the shoplifting
of two pair of pants, arrested and jailed, Ms. Jones retained
Buffalo criminal attorney Glenn E. Murray. The prosecutor,
having secured a copy of the store surveillance video tape, which
conclusively established Ms. Jones’ innocence, sought dismissal
of all charges in the interest of justice. Ms. Jones’ attorney
objected to the prosecutor’s request for dismissal and insisted
that his client, who was innocent, be allowed a trial by jury
for an opportunity to fully exonerate herself.
On July 16, 2002, in the Town of Amherst,
Justice William Waible granted the prosecutor’s request and dismissed
all charges in the interest of justice.
After criminal charges were dismissed,
Ms. Jones retained Buffalo attorney Richard Baumgarten, who filed
the Consumer Racial Profiling Civil Rights law suit.
The shocking video footage (which may
be viewed online)
shows the outright blatant disregard and disrespect by JCPenney
personnel toward the rights of minorities as these African-American
shoppers, for no apparent reason other than their race, were racially
profiled, followed and pursued throughout the JCPenney Department
store by video surveillance.
With regards to Ms. Jones, the video
shows that she picks out clothing she would eventually sample.
Two pairs of slacks are already in hand at the time the camera
picks up her image, she takes two more off the racks, goes to
the women's shirts, and eventually goes into the dressing room
with the items of clothing. Then Meerbooth and Goodwin focus
the camera outside the women’s dressing rooms. The camera
fades to black for about three minutes of elapsed store time.
The cameraman breaks his boredom by sweeping through other areas
of the department store, populated by Caucasian shoppers, focusing
on none, and then returns to the dressing room entrance to await
Jones’ exit. Jones eventually returns with the items of
clothing and returns them to 3 separate racks. Meerboth
and Goodwin continue video surveillance of Jones. Jones
chats with a Caucasian female, who appears to be a customer, eventually
leaves the store with no JCPenney items in her possession.
The complaint filed in federal court
alleges that after Ms. Jones left the JCPenney store she was followed
and apprehended by JCPenney security, subjected to an in-store
search in a private fitting room, which revealed that no stolen
property was found on her person, bags, or purse. Nevertheless,
the two JCPenney Loss Prevention Officers conspired together and
charged Ms. Jones with Petit Larceny, knowing full well the charge
wasn't true. Ms. Jones was arrested, jailed and released on bail
some 3 hours later, followed by months of prosecution.
Other lawsuits pending against JCPenney
Department stores alleging similar racial profiling practices
were filed by Paula Mayes, 45, who alleges that she was falsely
accused of shoplifting, slammed into a wall and pushed to the
floor after she exchanged a belt at a JCPenney store in Jacksonville,
Fla., and by Claudie Pierre, of Queens, New York, who alleged
in a complaint filed in federal court that after leaving the store
without making a purchase, she was approached by JCPenney security
guards on the street, accused of shoplifting, and verbally and
physically abused. Although a search revealed no stolen
merchandise, she was not allowed to leave the detention area for
nearly three hours.
When asked about the effects of racial
profiling on profiling victims, Rogers Hicks, a paralegal, who
assisted with the criminal case, and is presently working with
Mr. Baumgarten on Ms. Jones' Civil Rights case, quoted from a
Boston College Third World Law Journal article, “Shopping
While Black: Applying 42 USC 1981 to Cases of Consumer Racial
Profiling”: