There's a line of thinking I keep running
into that goes something like this: Because John Kerry supports Bush's
illegal and unpopular war, we should stop focusing on the election
and concentrate on building a grassroots movement. This argument has
a number of variations in which it's maintained that we should focus
on building a third party, or changing the system to allow third parties to be built, or threatening to withhold our
votes from Kerry until he adopts humane and popular positions.
One important objection to the recommendation that we shift our focus
to building a grassroots movement is that we've already built an enormous movement
that under probably any previous administration would have had a significant
impact. We don't lack a movement. What we lack is someone we can move with it.
The past four years have witnessed unprecedented anti-war rallies
including the largest ever, and including huge rallies prior to the
start of the war. We've seen the largest women's rights march ever,
almost certainly the largest rallies ever against welfare cuts and
tax cuts, an endless series of massive protests against "free
trade," and the development of an
enormous immigrants rights movement that last year held a series of rallies
and freedom rides across the country.
We've seen civil disobedience targeting the government and corporations. We've
seen coordinated efforts combining visits, phone calls, faxes, Emails, rallies,
and civil disobedience aimed at swinging the votes of key congress members
and senators. We've seen huge gains in traditional community organizing,
the development of internet organizing, the building of alliances
among our many organizations, and the gradual awakening of labor to the need for militant popular opposition.
We've seen local and state government rebellion against the federal government
in the form of law suits and simple refusal to implement policies.
We've seen hundreds of cities pass resolutions against the" PATRIOT
Act" and the war. Pollution, education, and GLBT rights are
all arenas of rebellion.
Bush, Cheney, and their cabinet members are hounded by protesters
everywhere they go in this country and outside of it. Anyone who doubts
that a movement has been built should have been in New York City at
the time of the Republican Convention. And it's important to be at
these events, not trust the media to tell you about it.
The media are the same people
who haven't told you about the entire movement that's been built.
OK, but won't the movement go away as soon as Kerry is elected? And
if it does not, won't Kerry ignore it just as the DNC has ignored
it, just as the Democratic Party Platform Committee has ignored it?
I think there is good reason to hope otherwise. For one thing, on
many issues the votes of Democrats in Congress have been responsive
to people's needs during the time that Nancy Pelosi has been minority
leader. Kerry's own voting record in the Senate, with some glaring
exceptions, has been better than his campaign rhetoric of recent weeks.
While some of us would argue that his campaigning to the right is
politically foolish, there is also reason to hope that some of it
is dishonest or at least malleable. During the primaries, Kerry moved left.
He did not say during the primaries that he would have voted for the war
even "knowing what he knows now." Kerry has moved to the
right because that has been the Democratic Party's strategy for losing
elections for a quarter century and because popular pressure on him
to move left has evaporated.
Yes, we should bring that pressure back and do so now for Kerry's
own good in hopes of attracting new voters, but I don't believe that's
going to happen in a significant enough way to break through. What
I do think will happen, if Kerry is elected, is a massive movement
beginning November 3rd to make Kerry a progressive president. I think
the same could have been done with Clinton – but we didn't even try. I think we could have nominated
a progressive Democrat in place of Kerry – but we didn't even try (OK,
there were some limited efforts). I think we can move Kerry to positive positions once
in office, and I think we're prepared to try. New organizations like Progressive
Democrats of America have made that their focus, and when the labor movement
is restructured next year it will not be in a way to make it less politically
aggressive. Electing Kerry is on everyone's minds, but so is pressuring Kerry
from day one.
Despite my claim that we have formed an impressive movement, there
are always ways in which it could be better and always
disagreements on how to focus it. My recommendations would
be as follows. First, between now and Kerry's arrival
in the White House focus our energy on electing him and on preventing
the stealing of the election with machines that produce no meaningfully
recountable paper records. Now is the time to demand simple paper
ballots from your county wherever you live. Nothing else is more important for the next two months.
Second, whatever our primary interests are, we should come together
to look beyond Kerry and make our number one demand of him now and
after the election the institution of instant runoff voting in all
federal elections before 2006. Kerry can be brought to understand
that IRV can boost turnout and help the Democrats, and help Kerry.
Progressives who despise the Democrats can understand that IRV will
give life to third parties and provide a powerful lever to move the
Democrats to democratic positions or in the long
term create a strong new party.
Third, and this should not be an issue until after the election for
obvious reasons, we must all push for media reform, as well as continuing
to build our own media. If we do not, we will not win on our other
issues, including war and peace, trade, health care, civil rights,
the environment, campaign finance reform, and on and on. As long as
the media locks us out we will not know our own strength, and therefore we will not have any strength.
Yes, we could build an even bigger movement that could win changes
even under Bush, but it would be very very difficult, and many of
us would suffer horribly. Yes, electing Kerry in and of itself does
not go nearly far enough. But if we elect Kerry and also build a bigger,
tougher, more coordinated movement - if we demand endlessly that Kerry
be our friend rather than our trying to be his - there will be hope,
encouragement, and new life in this country and the world.
David Swanson's website is www.davidswanson.org
www.blackcommentator.com
Your
comments are welcome.
Visit
the Contact Us page for E-mail or
Feedback.
Back
|