The following essay originally appeared in the
journal of the African National Congress (ANC) of South Africa.
There was another important July birthday that passed in our country
without public notice. But not so in Haiti, where thousands of people
took to the streets bearing placards carrying the words – “Bonne Féte
President Titid” – Happy Birthday President Titid.
The birthday demonstrators also demanded the return of Titid – President
Jean-Bertrand Aristide, an honored guest in our country. Titid, “little
Aristide,” is the affectionate Creole nickname given to President
Aristide by the poor of his country. He quietly celebrated his 51st
birthday
in our country on July 15.
Where our people did not join him in these celebrations because they
did not know it was his birthday, the people of Haiti did not forget.
But they could not join him because circumstances had taken him and
his family far away from his beloved motherland.
On July 15, CNN reported that, “Aristide supporters, singing ‘happy
birthday,’ marched with empty plates and spoons to show they were hungry. ‘If
Aristide was here, we would be celebrating with him and eat with him
at the national palace on his birthday today,’ said Michele Sanon,
a resident of the Cité Soleil slum.”
Reuters reported that on the very day that President Aristide quietly
celebrated his 51st birthday and the slum dwellers marched in protest
at his absence, gunmen killed two policemen in Haiti's capital, Port-au-Prince,
having fired on a group of police officers standing in the street.
The authorities said the attack was politically motivated.
Port-au-Prince Police Commissioner Harry Beauport said, "We firmly
believe the police are being targeted, because we have noted a series
of attacks against our policemen, several of them deadly.”
The news agency said, “With rebel forces still in control of many
areas of the country, tensions between police and rebels have been
rising in recent weeks. Rebel leaders have criticized government plans
to disarm their soldiers, a move that would leave Haitian police and
United Nations peacekeepers in charge of security in the country. The
rebels, many of whom are former members of the Haitian army disbanded
by Aristide in the mid-1990s, have demanded the creation of a new army.”
As much as they did not know of President Aristide’s birthday, our
people will be ignorant of all this and much else that is happening
in Haiti. They will not have had access to the June 21st article written
by a Haitian, Lucson Pierre-Charles, entitled “Haiti
After the Press Went Home: Chaos Upon Chaos.”
Evidently the US and other journalists, who had come to Haiti in the
period preceding the removal of President Aristide on February 29th,
went home soon after the President was taken out of his country.
Pierre-Charles writes that, “The country is descending into chaos
and to have a better understanding of what lies ahead, one needs to
look no further than to the latest travel warning for Haiti issued
by the Bureau of Consular Affairs at the State Department.
“According to that statement, the situation in Haiti remains unpredictable
and potentially dangerous despite the presence of foreign security
forces. This warning followed a report issued in early May by the United
Nations reaching a similar conclusion.”
He continues, “The security apparatus is on the verge of collapsing
due to the proliferation of small arms, the mere presence of the heavily
armed rebels and Aristide loyalists, the increasing gang activities,
the rampant rise in kidnappings and the release of 3,000 prisoners
by Guy Philippe and his squads following the ouster of Mr. Aristide.
Some of the rebels will be integrated into the police force despite
the fact that they killed a great number of policemen and burned down
police headquarters in the lead up to the coup.
“In most parts of the country, they appointed themselves as mayors,
police chiefs and judges. (One report says 6,000 elected officials
have been removed and replaced by self-appointed individuals.) Under
Mr. Aristide’s leadership, the police force was often criticized for
being too heavily politicized. Under (the) technocratic administration
(installed after the removal of President Aristide), the police force
will consist of convicted human rights abusers, murderers, rapists,
thugs and death squads who have committed some of the worst atrocities
during the first coup in 1991.”
On May 4th, a 9-person Labor/Religious/Community Fact-Finding Delegation
visited Haiti. Sent by the San Francisco Labor Council, it included
US and Canadian trade unionists, religious leaders and human rights
activists. It reported that:
“The coup which deposed President Aristide has
led to a serious wave of attacks and persecutions of supporters
of President Aristide
and his Fanmi Lavalas Party. The delegation heard testimony from
an elected Member of Parliament for the Fanmi Lavalas who is living
in
hiding, having been driven out of his town under gunfire. Other
political leaders and known activists have also been forced into
hiding, living
underground, fearing the death threats and violence directed
at supporters of the ousted government. Despite its obvious popularity,
the Fanmi
Lavalas movement is not currently able to have political demonstrations
or otherwise take open political action due to the threat of
attack.
“The (new administration)…has not provided security for those
currently most at risk. The names of Lavalas supporters – and even
those suspected of being Lavalas supporters – are being read off
on right-wing radio stations as an implicit threat. Neither the
coup regime nor its international
backers have taken action to contain what many Haitians refer
to as an anti-Lavalas 'witch hunt' that continues to this
day.”
A US human rights activist and College Professor who has been
visiting Haiti since 1977, Tom
Reeves, wrote on May 5, “The
very same para-military and former Army officers who terrorized
Haiti during
the previous (1991) coup are doing so today. Their victims are
mostly the poor and their popular organizations who supported
(and still support)
President Aristide and Fanmi Lavalas. We interviewed many of
these victims who said they recognized their tormentors (and
in one case
rapists) as the same men who had victimized them a decade ago.
Among those terrorizing Haiti today are many common criminals
who were let
out of the National penitentiary by the ‘rebels,’ as well as
major convicted human rights abusers and mass murderers like
Jodel Chamblain
and Jean ‘Tatoune.’”
The “previous coup” to which Reeves refers took place in 1991, when
the Haiti military seized power and forced the elected President Aristide
into exile. The then US government, opposed to unconstitutional changes
of government, assisted him to return to power in 1994. On resuming
his term as President, he dissolved the Army, leaving the civilian
police to be responsible for national security.
Oscar Arias, the former President of Costa Rica, was awarded the Nobel
Peace Prize in 1987. Disturbed by the reappearance of the soldiers
who had carried out the 1991 coup d’etat, and the demands that the
Haitian army, dissolved in 1995, should be reconstituted, he spoke
out on March 15.
He observed that one Guy Philippe had been quoted by The Washington
Post saying, "I am the chief, the military chief. The country
is in my hands." Arias wrote:
“Nothing could more clearly prove why Haiti does
not need an army than the boasting of rebel leader Guy Philippe
the other day in Port-au-Prince.
The Haitian army was abolished nine years ago during a
period of democratic transition, precisely to prevent the country
from falling
back into
the hands of military men.
“Like so many countries in the Third World, Haiti
has suffered not only from a lack of national security in the sense
of borders and territorial
integrity but also from an ongoing crisis of human security,
the right of each person to live in peace and with the guarantee
of basic rights
such as food, health care, education and citizenship.
“The army, long an instrument of suppressive
authoritarian regimes, has historically deprived Haitians of these
fundamental rights.
“The abolition of the army makes as much sense
today as it did in 1995. The Haitian people still need their government
to spend its precious
few resources on fighting poverty, not buying arms. They
need a professional, depoliticized police force to maintain order,
not an army that attacks
its own people with impunity. They need a say in their
country's destiny, not subjugation to the rule of men with guns.
“Were the international community now to stand
by as the rebels reinstated the army, it would surely destroy the
seeds of peace and
self-rule that have been planted with great sacrifice
by the Haitian people.”
Guy Philippe was a death squad leader under the Duvaliers and a member
of the FRAPH we mention below. He was taken into the police when the
army was dissolved in 1995. Human Rights Watch says that police under
his command summarily executed people they arrested. Discovered to
be planning a coup d’etat in 2000, he fled to the neighboring Dominican
Republic.
Here he linked up with other killers of the Duvalier period, including
Louis Jodel Chamblain, Jean Pierre Baptiste, who calls himself General
Tatoune, and the leader of the 1991 coup d’etat, Emmanuel ‘Toto’ Constant.
Of Chamblain and Baptiste, the February 29 edition of the “San Francisco
Chronicle” (SFC) said Chamblain is “a former army officer who later
headed the Front for the Advancement of the Haitian People or FRAPH,
a paramilitary organization responsible for thousands of murders of
Aristide followers in the early 1990s.
“Baptiste and Chamblain were convicted in absentia for massacring
25 Aristide supporters in a seaside slum known as Raboteau in the northern
city of Gonaives in 1994.”
As he and his fellow “rebels” marched on Port-au-Prince in February,
Chamblain, as quoted by the SFC, said: “The army was demobilized. Now
the army has been remobilized and is a constitutional army. Aristide
has two choices: prison or execution by firing squad.”
Concerned at what might happen when they succeeded to overthrow the
democratic government of Haiti, Deputy Director of the Americas Division
of Human Rights Watch, Joanne Mariner, said: “These men, notorious
for killings and other abuses during the military government, must
not be allowed to take violent reprisals against government loyalists.”
The SFC also reported that while Guy Philippe served in the leadership
of the Haiti police, he and his colleagues from the former Duvalier
army “began collecting bribes for the drugs that easily pass through
this nation of 8 million people. Internal reports from foreign observers
found that the ‘Latinos’ routinely gave gifts to politicians and once
squeezed the government into exiling its former inspector general after
the seizure of more than three-quarters of a ton of cocaine implicated
the men.”
It is no wonder that Tom Reeves even in 2003, after Philippe and others
had started their violent campaign against the Aristide government,
could quote a young man of Cap-Haitien as saying, "It's the army
I really despise. At least now I can sit here with my friends and complain.
Under the military, I would be shot. When I saw Himmler leading the
demonstration by the Convergence last November, I was really scared."
Reeves wrote that, “The aptly named Himmler is Himmler Rebu, a former
army officer who has been involved in several coup attempts.”
Those, like Rebu, who prepared the putsch that led to the removal
of the government of Haiti in 2004, carried out a violent provocation
at a university on December 5, 2003, which they proceeded to blame
on Lavalas.
The US journalist and documentary filmmaker, Kevin
Pina,
Associate Editor of “The Black Commentator” wrote:
“In the wake
of the fabricated events of December 5, the Haitian government
and Lavalas endured weeks
of clandestine attacks, while the opposition
demonstrated under heavy police protection.
“Then, on December 26, the great silent beast of Haiti’s
poor, portrayed as violent and anti-democratic by the Haitian press
and their friends
in the international corporate media, awakened.
Tens of thousands of Lavalas supporters hit the streets with a
singular
purpose and objective:
that Haiti's constitution be respected and President
Aristide be allowed to fulfill his five-year term in office.
“The real battle had just begun, as Haiti’s long-oppressed millions
prepared to celebrate the 200th anniversary of the world’s
only successful slave revolution and the first
black republic.”
Michele Sanon, who demonstrated in Port-au-Prince on July 15 to celebrate
her President’s birthday and demand his return, carrying an empty plate
and a spoon, is part of “the great silent beast of Haiti’s poor” of
which Pina wrote. She, like many among Haiti’s urban and rural poor,
see President Aristide as their very own Titid.
One other of her Lavalas leaders is Annette Auguste, who was
arrested on May 10, on the pretext that she was involved in the
December 5 events.
She sent out a message on May 23 from Pétionville Penitentiary,
where she was detained.
For us, her words recall a time, which is not so long ago, when we
too had to fight for our liberation. She wrote:
“While I have been forced to sit in this jail
cell I have also seen the cynicism of some within our party, brought
about by this campaign
of repression, intimidation and assassination.
I understand their fear, as I am myself a victim of this campaign
whose purpose is to destroy
our hope and aspirations for building a Haiti
where the poor are not simple tools upon which to build dreams
of personal
empire and wealth.
“I send you all my love and gratitude for remaining
strong in separating the lies from the truth in Haiti's current situation.
I send you all
my blessings as a free Haitian woman fighting for
the rights of the impoverished majority in my homeland.
“They may imprison my body but they will never
imprison the truth I know in my soul. I will continue to fight for
justice and truth in
Haiti until I draw my last breath.”
Annette Auguste’s moving message draws attention to the real nature
of the struggle in Haiti, which the working people of that country,
the slum dwellers who demand the return of President Aristide, understand
very well.
From his election in 1990, President Aristide and other patriots have
been engaged in a complex and difficult struggle to establish the stable
democratic system that has eluded the First Black Republic since its
birth 200 years ago. They have also sought to ensure that this new
democracy should address the interests of the majority of the people,
the black urban and rural poor.
An adherent of Liberation Theology, together with such outstanding
progressive thinkers within the Roman Catholic Church as Helder Camara,
Gustavo Gutiérrez, Oscar Romero, Ernesto Cardenal and Erwin Kräutler,
President Aristide would have been inspired by such Biblical teachings
as:
“He hath shewed strength with his arm; he hath scattered the proud
in the imagination of their hearts. He hath put down the mighty from
their seats, and exalted them of low degree. He hath filled the hungry
with good things; and the rich he hath sent empty away.” (Luke
1: 51-53.)
Opposed to the related political and social outcomes President Aristide
sought are sections of the population of Haiti, which have historically
been the beneficiaries of successive systems of dictatorship that have
guaranteed the privileges of the few and the impoverishment of the
many, keeping the mighty in their seats and subjugating those of low
degree. The privileged few have consistently depended on state repression
to protect this social order, as Oscar Arias said.
The Duvalier regimes of “Papa Doc and Baby Doc” developed this
repression into open state terrorism against the masses of the
people, relying
on the police, the Army that was disbanded
in 1995 and the “tonton
macoutes.” Agents and practitioners of the
Duvalier state terrorism led the counter-revolution
of 2004, which resulted in the overthrow of
the Aristide government.
The central purpose of the counter-revolution is to halt and reverse
the long-delayed democratic revolution in Haiti, guarantee the positions
of the privileged few, and ensure the continued oppression, disempowerment
and impoverishment of the millions of poor Haitians. In many respects,
the 2004 counter-revolution in Haiti was not dissimilar to the counter-revolution
in Chile in 1973, which resulted in the overthrow of the Allende government,
the death of the President, and the installation of the Pinochet military
dictatorship.
In his July article, “Haiti’s Cracked Screen: Lavalas Under Siege
While the Poor Get Poorer,” Kevin Pina described Haiti today in the
following terms:
“Former Haitian military leaders prance hand
in hand with Haiti's traditional economic elite, intellectuals
and artists. The poor black
majority, who cannot read or write and
continue to support the constitutional government of President
Aristide, has been deliberately made indescribably
poorer in an effort to force them to turn against their own
interests.
“Going to bed hungry is not uncommon in Haiti. The greatest violence
here is the violence of hunger and poverty. It permeates and consumes
everything in its path. Haiti's phantom ‘middle class’ – the relative
few who have something such as an education to cling to – can
be easily manipulated against a government
that has declared itself to be working
on behalf of those who have nothing save
for the conviction that tomorrow may yield
a better future for their children. This
is especially true
when the media inside and outside of Haiti
do everything possible to make it so.”
On February 29th, the day President Aristide was flown out of his
country, the UN Security Council adopted a Resolution on Haiti. Among
other things, it decided to establish an intervention force and directed
this UN contingent to:
What was and is strange and disturbing about this Resolution is that
it is totally silent on the central issue of the unconstitutional and
anti-democratic removal of the elected Government of Haiti. It says
nothing about the notorious figures who achieved this objective, arms
in hand, killing many people.
Seemingly to avoid the obligation to disarm and punish those who took
up arms against a democratic government, it even directed that the
UN forces should discharge these obligations “as circumstances permit.”
However, it is perfectly obvious that a safe and secure environment
in Haiti, respect for human rights, and a return to constitutional
legality cannot be achieved without defeating the criminal forces of
counter-revolution that necessitated the deployment of UN troops and
other international interventions. The declared purposes of the UN
cannot be realized while those schooled in the brutal practices of
the Duvalier’s occupy the center-stage in Haiti.
The UN will not achieve its goals if it does not guarantee the safety
and security and the democratic rights of the leaders and members of
Fanmi Lavalas, other democrats and the poor of Haiti who demand democracy
and development.
Time will tell whether the UN is ready and willing to live up to its
obligations to the poor of Haiti, as well as respect the binding principles
contained in its Charter and the Declaration of Human Rights. Time
will tell whether what Oscar Arias warned against will be avoided – the
destruction of “the seeds of peace and self-rule that have been planted
with great sacrifice by the Haitian people.” What has been allowed
to happen in Haiti After the Press Went Home raises serious concerns
in this regard.
As the African slaves of Haiti fought for their liberation more than
two centuries ago, among other things the counter-revolution opposed
to the French Revolution tried hard to restore the slavery in Haiti
that Jacobin France had abolished, propelled by the heroic struggle
of the risen slaves.
At that time, the outstanding leader of the revolutionary African
slaves, Toussaint L’Ouverture, wrote to the French Directory and, speaking
of the counter-revolution, said:
“Do they think that men who have been able to enjoy the blessing
of liberty will calmly see it snatched away? They supported their chains
only so long as they did not know any condition of life more happy
than that of slavery. But today when they have left it, if they had
a thousand lives they would sacrifice them all rather than be forced
into slavery again… We have known
how to face dangers to obtain our
liberty, but we shall know how to brave death to maintain it.”
Annette Auguste has sent the same message to the counter-revolution
of 2004. In her heart burns the same unquenchable desire to build “a
Haiti where the poor are not simple tools upon which to build dreams
of personal empire and wealth,” which inspired her forebears to defeat
the mighty European powers and establish the First Black Republic.
The risen slaves achieved their liberation even though their brilliant
and renowned leader, Toussaint L’Ouverture, was imprisoned far away
in a French jail. The poor of the slums of Bel Air, Cité Soleil and
elsewhere in Haiti will achieve their liberation even though their
brave and beloved leader, Jean-Bertrand Aristide, is an honored guest
far away in South Africa.
Knowledge of that past, and this future, was the best birthday present
that Titid received, to celebrate his 51st birthday. Bonne Fête President
Titid.
|