This article previously appeared in UNObserver.com and Islamonline.net. The popular perception in the US is that Iraq
is a country of uncivilized criminals and terrorists raised to
hate America because
common people hate freedom and liberty, “ragheads” and “sand
niggers” who brought down the Twin Towers in New York City
and attacked the Pentagon. US-based columnists have taken to calling
Iraqis lazy and ungrateful. In a prime-time press conference, US
President George Bush said the Iraqis must take control of their
own destinies come June 30th.
The fact that many of the kidnapped foreign
workers were Pakistanis, Bangladeshis and other Asians who used
to drive cars and trucks
should get the message across that everyone is allowed a job in
Iraq – except the Iraqis. Take Coalition Provisional Authority
head L. Paul Bremer who issued Order 39 (September 19), which declares
that 100 percent ownership of Iraqi banks, mines and factories
is allowed to be foreign-owned and 100 percent of profits from
these Iraqi institutions is allowed to be moved out of the country.
Where do Iraqis fit in? Is it any surprise they feel cheated and
robbed? Does a robbed man stand by and watch his possessions dwindle?
This is the ignorance that is supported, endorsed, encouraged
and tolerated by everyone from the Bush administration down to
every major news outlet in the US.
Take for example the handling of the four Americans
who were killed in Fallujah, had their corpses burned, dismembered
and then hanged
on a bridge. Every news outlet in the US spoke of the four heroic
American “civilians.” Iraqis butchered four decent,
law-abiding civilians. Civilians who left their families in helping
to rebuild Iraq. That is the version the American public is given.
However, the truth is that the four were former
US soldiers working as security agents for North Carolina-based
Blackwater Corp, which – among
other things – is charged with protecting L. Paul Bremer.
Secondly, it is no secret that many of the operations the US military
used to undertake have now been slated for private security firms
like Blackwater. Effectively, they are hired help – mercenaries.
One of them was a Navy Seal, one of the most decorated and highly
trained outfits in the US military.
Missing from the national (and international) discussion are the
reports that cited weapons found on the four slain men. Anyone
who has seen news footage of the private security firms running
about in Iraq will immediately recognize that they are armed to
the teeth, wearing flak jackets. Initial reports said that the
corpses were wearing blue-colored flak jackets.
The “civilians” theory doesn't
hold much water.
In fact, and unreported to US audiences, private
security firms in Iraq, much like Blackwater, are taking over
major tasks and
operations primarily assigned to US forces. The hope is that US
forces remain in barracks, avoid improvised explosive devices (IEDs)
and ambushes, reduce the body count, and keep the US public firmly
behind the war. In effect, private security firms have become a
de facto military presence in Iraq – outnumbering the official
count of non-US military “coalition” forces.
If the US military is the occupying force in
Iraq and is replaced by what should be considered a mercenary
force – bought and
paid for to undertake military duties – then the private
security firms become legitimate targets for a populace that feels
itself occupied and bound to resist.
And that is precisely what several dozen clerics
in Iraq and the Arab world have said. They did not condemn the
right to attack
the four armed men – remember, they were armed – but
did strongly condemn in unmistakable terms the mutilations and
public hangings that occurred later. Islamic law strictly prohibits
the maiming or disrespecting of any dead body, even that of an
animal. According to the Prophet Mohammed, even spitting at a dead
body – whether it is of an enemy or ally, Jew, Christian,
or Muslim is irrelevant – is considered sacrilegious. The
Prophet routinely stood up in respect as the funeral processions
of Jews and Christians passed by his domicile. However, this little
tidbit about what is permissible and prohibited in Islam was left
out of US reporting.
After the killing of the four Blackwater employees,
more than 700 people were slaughtered in Fallujah. More than
2,000 civilians
were wounded, hundreds of houses have been entirely destroyed,
and four mosques have been damaged. The city was placed under siege,
cut off from food, water, and medical supplies. “We are resorting
to collective punishment,” Newsweek editor Fareed Zakaria
told Chris Matthews on Hardball. Zakaria denied the official US
position that fighters in the “Sunni Triangle” are “dead-enders.” He
also claimed uneven-handedness in Iraq was feeding the “insurgency.”
Punitive collective punishment of this kind is reminiscent of
German Nazi policies during the occupation of France. Take for
example the German Nazi response in the French town of Tulle in
1944. History shows the French Resistance had seized the town from
the German 3rd Battalion and 95th Security Regiment. When the Das
Reich Panzer Division retook the town, they found 64 badly mutilated
German bodies. Revenge came swiftly: The SS-Panzer Aufklarungs
Abteilung 2 platoon seized 99 men and promptly executed them, later
hanging their bodies as a sign to others. Some 100 civilians who
were deported to concentration camps would die in Germany.
To the Germans, the civilians were “insurgents and terrorist
sympathizers”; to the rest of the world, they were civilians.
For their part, the French resistance fighters were not labeled
as terrorists; they were called La Resistance (the resistance)
and achieved a near mythical status in European history.
As civilian casualties escalated, US military commanders, hoping
to save face in Iraq and the Arab World, began to accuse the defenders
of Fallujah of hiding behind women and children. That statement
flies in the face of video footage shot by Al Jazeera and carried
on ABC, CBS, MSNBC, and NBC clearly showing Iraqi fighters running
between streets, in trenches, atop buildings, firing their RPGs
and automatic weapons. No women and children in sight.
When a large convoy of aid supplies carrying blood for hospital
transfusions, food, and water managed to break through a US military
roadblock, the media called it a delivery of aid to Sunni rebels.
Missing from the report were mentions of doctors feeling overwhelmed
and ill-equipped to deal with the growing death toll and the number
of civilians facing a humanitarian crisis due to lack of drinkable
water and unspoiled food (Fallujah was dependent on shipments from
the rest of Iraq).
On April 12, as Arab journalists (including
Iraqi journalists) pressed the Coalition to comment on civilian
deaths in Fallujah
, US General Mark Kimmit refused to acknowledge that it was civilians
who were killed. US media swallowed it hook, line and sinker with
MSNBC reporting, “U.S. officials say about 700 insurgents
and 70 coalition troops have been killed since April 1, but Iraqi
civilian toll is unclear.” Despite persistent reports from
Al Jazeera and other Arab media, despite the graphic pictures of
women and children cut to pieces, despite the angry wails of hospital
staff and appeals for humanitarian assistance, US media refused
to toe anything but the official government line.
Isn’t that how the fabrications, reliance on unreliable
defectors, and other misconceptions about Iraq ’s WMD were
propagated in the first place? What of the Iraq-Al Qaeda link,
which has since been debunked? Was it not US media that reported
every “official” word coming out of the Bush administration
and various Washington think tanks as gospel?
Why?
Racism is the answer. There is an arrogance
in the West that everything Western is superior, exemplary and
ideal for all cultures. In 2002,
Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi said that Islamic culture
was inferior to Western civilization. This school of thought is
prevalent throughout every sector of US society and has been nudged
on by the various “hate-films” that Hollywood churns
every year. Arabs are portrayed as stupid, animalistic, amoral,
sex-starved, abusive, wife-battering terrorists who seek to kill
themselves – and their children – so that they can
languish with 72 virgins in heaven. That Arabs saved Western civilization
by translating the Greek philosophies and complementing them, introducing
algebra, geometry and astronomy to Europe, is left out. That the
first medical institute in world history was established by Muslims
in – wait for it – southern Iraq is also lost on the
US public.
It is no surprise then when we hear that British
commanders in Iraq have condemned the Americans’ heavy-handed and disproportionate
military tactics. According to The Telegraph's Sean Rayment, a
British officer “who agreed to the interview on the condition
of anonymity, said that part of the problem was that American troops
viewed Iraqis as 'untermenschen' – the Nazi expression for ‘sub-humans’.
“They are not concerned about the Iraqi loss of life in
the way the British are. Their attitude towards the Iraqis is tragic,
it's awful.” The British officer accused the US military
of targeting “terrorists” even if they are located
in densely-populated civilian areas: “They may well kill
the terrorists in the barrage but they will also kill and maim
innocent civilians. That has been their response on a number of
occasions. It is trite, but American troops do shoot first and
ask questions later. They are very concerned about taking casualties
and have even trained their guns on British troops, which has led
to some confrontations between soldiers,” The Telegraph reported.
By the way, if you weren’t around during the Nazi purging
of Europe’s Jews, “untermenschen” is the popular
term a certain Adolf Hitler used in Mein Kampf to express his disdain
for what he termed the “inferior” Jews.
Consequently, if the US military, a branch
of the US government, considers Iraqis as inferior beings, we
can then extrapolate that
US lawmakers view Iraqis as lesser peoples. Perhaps that helps
explain why the Bush administration is so irked by news reports
showing dead Iraqi women and children. Perhaps it helps explain
why he accuses Arab media – including Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya – of
being propagandists and liars. Perhaps it also explains why every
Iraqi protestation in the last few years about lack of WMDs was
shot down by US media and Iraqi officials were branded expert liars.
Perhaps, it also explains why “the axis of evil” slogan
was so popular with Washington neocons. Inferior people are considered
satanic and evil. After all, was this not how slavery was maintained
and thrived in the continental US in the 17th, 18th, 19th, and
20th centuries? Were not the slaves considered by white (supremacist)
landowners to be cursed by God, soulless and would never see the
gates of heaven? Was this not how Apartheid was allowed to survive
in the heart of black Africa?
Racism. The same racism that allowed 800,000 Rwandan Hutus and
Tutsis to die exactly 10 years ago while the so-called compassionate
superpower focused on twiddling their thumbs. The same racism that
refused to apologize for centuries of slavery at the Durban Conference
in South Africa on September 8, 2001.
Newsweek’s Zakaria put it best when he told Chris Matthews
how Iraqis must feel: “We lost four on our side and they
lost 700. What do you think that tells them? That their lives are
not nearly as important?”
Touché.
Firas Al-Atraqchi is a Canadian journalist of Iraqi heritage.
Holding an MA in Journalism and Mass Communication, he has eleven
years of experience covering Middle East issues, oil and gas
markets, and the telecom industry. You can reach him at [email protected]. |