All
places of worship are now allowed to conduct religious services.
However, how safe is it to reopen them versus the legal permission to
do so during an ongoing pandemic that has not hit its testing target?
The
guideline restriction placed on places of worship has been like
stepping on a landmine for states that want them closed like
Massachusetts Governor Baker. Since the beginning of the states'
stay-at-home advisory in March, most churches have complied, but not
all. Early May, more than 260 minsters from across the Commonwealth
expressed their grievances in a signed letter to Baker, demanding
their places of worship reopen with social distancing protocols
before Baker finally lifted the ban.
"I
want to open churches in a responsible and safe way to do that,"
Baker stated on the May 21 segment of WGBH's Boston Public Radio.
However, reopening places of worship as “essentials businesses”
would most likely not be on the governor’s Phase 1 list of his
4-Phase COVID-19 reopening plan. Still, Baker stated, "I had
pressure around Constitutional issues and couldn't ignore it."
The
question of what limits local and state officials can place on
religious practices in the name of public safety is an important one.
First, these limitations should be measured by the gravity of the
crisis. Second, these limitations should be assessed if they are
being singled out and discriminated against for stricter treatment.
Neither was the case for the 260 ministers who signed a letter to
Baker demanding their places of worship reopen contesting
infringement of freedom of religion and freedom of assembly. And,
with these First Amendment freedoms, in my opinion, comes
responsibility.
COVID-19
continues to pose an existential threat to public health and safety.
Many of the churches that flouted social distancing guidelines became
hot spots in their regions, increasing infection and death rates in
states like in Arkansas, California, and Kentucky, to name a few.
While
we don't know all the ways the virus is spread, the primary mode of
transmission is from respiratory droplets caused by coughing or
sneezing in close contact. The request for churches to suspend their
usual in-person gatherings is not curtailing worship because other
ways to worship can be employed like virtual streaming. The request
is a mitigation strategy to temporarily press a pause button on one
form of religious expression- crowd size- that can be identified with
COVID-19 transmission.
If
you want confusion in this delicate balance between church and state,
and First Amendment rights and the right to protect public health,
simply add Trump to the mix. Trump made it emphatically clear that if
governors did not follow his recommendations allowing in-person
religious services to resume, he would "override" them.
"Some
governors have deemed liquor stores and abortion clinics as
essential, but have left out churches and other houses of worship,
it's not right," Trump said at the White House. "So I'm
correcting this injustice and calling houses of worship essential. I
call upon governors to allow our churches and places of worship to
open right now," Today.com
reported.
Trump,
however, exploits the issue for his campaign re-election. And, it
has been like stepping on a landmine for the CDC. The guideline
restriction on places of worship suggested by the CDC was to avoid a
virus resurgence. Initially, Trump objected to the original CDC's
reopening guidelines as "too prescriptive" and infringing
on religious liberty. The 38-page watered-down document had no
reopening instructions for places of worship. I was on an Interfaith
Community Leadership Zoom call for Cambridge clergy to discuss the
Governor's Mandatory Safety Standards and Checklist for Houses of
Worship. Confusion abounded than clarity about safety as we
compared the CDC's earlier guidelines advising gatherings of no more
than ten people to the governor's new instructions limiting places of
worship occupancy to 40 percent. Baker, no doubt, was under pressure
not to be "too prescriptive."
Now,
to avoid stepping on Trump's landmine, the new CDC guidelines state
the following:
"The
information offered is non-binding public health guidance for
consideration only; it is not meant to regulate or prescribe
standards for interactions of faith communities in houses of worship.
Any decision to modify specific religious rites, rituals, and
services should be made by religious leaders."
COVID-19
clusters have been linked to churches. In this pandemic, the ongoing
challenge for places of worship will be how to reopen and to protect
public health. In an already divided country, health precautions
should not be weaponized as an infringement on religious liberty.
Instead, they should be seen as "essential" for maintaining
the well-being and sustainability of a worshiping body.
In
Massachusetts, the number of deaths due to COVID-19 is declining. Hot
spots like places of worship can continue to help in its decline
|