The
F-35 stealth fighter aircraft is one expensive plane. It costs $135
million to produce a single aircraft, but Congress is prepared to
authorize spending for 90 more planes, a dozen more than the Pentagon
has requested. Why? Lobbyists for Lockheed Martin, the company that
produces these aircraft, have exercised their fine art of persuasion
to convince the House Armed Services Committee that these aircraft
are needed for our national “defense”. Wouldn’t
you think the Pentagon has a better idea of what they “need”
than lobbyists? Or are the profits of this corporation more
important than the fiscal prudence that so many in Washington crow
about when looking at education, Social Security, health care or
programs that address human needs?
There
is much to object to about the “Defense” budget, as
defense spending absorbs more than half of all of spending from our
budget. But spending on the F-35 aircraft is especially egregious.
More than a trillion dollars will be spent on this aircraft, a
trillion. Enough to eliminate all student debt, or fully endow the
nation’s historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs)
with money left over! What do we get from this trillion? We get
an aircraft with supply chain problems that the General Accounting
Office has described as “falling short of warfighter
requirements”. They say the aircraft, “cannot perform as
many missions or fly as often as required”, partly because of a
“shortage in spare parts and limited repair capability”.
So Lockheed Martin is producing this $135 million aircraft, more than
two thousand, to be exact, without producing the requisite spare
parts or developing the appropriate repair capabilities.
Bloomberg
News described the F-35 program, “as the world’s
costliest weapons program.” Its entire history has been
fraught with both cost and efficiency problems. Why, then, are
lobbyist pushing Congress to order more of these planes, more, even
than the Pentagon wants? Follow the money. It’s all about the
profits.
While
the House Armed Services Committee is planning to waste billions of
dollars on these costly and flawed F-35 planes, poor people around
the country gathered in Washington to hear from Rev. William Barber,
and Rev. Liz Theoharis about the Moral Budget. Believe me, there is
no room for F-35 fighter planes in the Moral Budget. Instead, the
poor People’s Campaign increased spending on human needs, like
heath care, education, and that oh-so-basic need – food! It
might have been impactful for members of the House Armed Services
Committee to spend a few moments with the Poor People’s
Congress, the thousand or so people who crowded into Trinity Hall at
Trinity Washington University to demand equity in education,
affordable health care, and more.
The
Poor People’s Moral Budget has the theme, “Everybody Has
the Right to Live”. The budget would cut $350 billion in
military spending, while increasing taxes on the wealthy,
corporations, and Wall Street. It represents a paradigm shift from
our nation’s current focus on militarism to a focus on human
needs. Our nations hawks, and our President, believe that profligate
military spending makes our world safer, which is nonsense! Indeed,
the possibility of military action against Iran (and the deployment
of a thousand more troops to the Middle East in late June), suggests
that militarism makes the world dangerous, not safer. In any case in
this militaristic climate, the move to order more F35s than even the
President wants is nothing more than a profit-serving move to benefit
Lockheed Martin, the corporation that can’t even produce enough
spare parts for the planes it has already produced!
The
Poor People’s Congress operated in stark contrast to the House
Armed Services Committee. Rev. William Barber testified before the
House Budget Committee on June 19, 2019, calling for an end to police
violence against poor people and urged Congress to embrace its moral
budget. By continuing profligate spending on F35 fighter planes, and
funding more planes than even the Pentagon wants, Congress is
engaging in policy violence against all Americans, but especially the
140 million who are poor!
|