Splinters
from the 2020 Democratic Presidential Campaign Trail
Joe
Biden is hewing to a center right political approach to secure the
2020 Democratic Presidential nomination, and so far, he has been
able to keep voters of color ‘happy’ while he reaches
out to white moderates, independents, and Trump’s hardcore
base.
Democrats
show no signs of understanding or addressing President Trump’s
deft deployment of racial strategies to spearhead his 2020 approach
to reelection. They are dismissing them as more of the same old
brash, lying, misogynistic, obnoxious Trump. They fail to realize
that there is a thoughtful, political method behind his unorthodox
style of functioning as the nation’s leader.
Trump,
as did his Republican predecessor, George W. Bush (in 2000 and 2004),
realizes that he only needs to cobble together 270 Electoral College
votes to retain his office. He narrowly defeated Hillary Clinton in
the 2016 presidential election by winning the reliably Democratic
states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin largely as a result
of her mistaken sureness in her campaign algorithms.
She
refused to direct personal and financial resources to these
previously Democratic bastions. Proof of her folly is the Democrats
flipping of Republican seats in these same states during the 2018
midterms by returning to the above-mentioned strategies. This time
around, Trump is upping his dependence on race to both divide the
electorate and to congeal his base, understanding that he only needs
to garner 51 percent of the votes cast in any state or political
jurisdiction (or a plurality in a race of three candidates or more)
to win.
Trump
is depending on minority voter suppression, in numerous forms, the
continued recruitment of minority clergy and grassroots leaders to
push his outreach to minorities via criminal justice reforms, the use
of more virulent, anti-immigrant rhetoric and schemes to feed his
base’s continuing need for racist fuel, and his rapid changing
of the ideological composition of federal District, Appeals, and the
U.S. Supreme Courts which will reinforce his edicts from the Oval
office.
Minority
voter suppression is the centerpiece of his reelection tactics. It
is taking a variety of forms: the escalating use of Voter ID in
heavily minority precincts, reduction of polling places in minority
areas, usage of Russian trolls, escalating minority voter
intimidation and vote theft, and the proposed 2020 census question
about citizenship.
Voter
ID is proving to be a tried and true scheme for reducing minority
voter participation. In addition to laws being proposed and/or
passed in more than two dozen states, it is often illegally requested
at local polls in minority areas. Coupled with the deliberate
reduction of voting precincts in minority neighborhoods, voters of
color have more difficulty in accessing the ballot.
Russian
trolls are again targeting African American voters to dissuade them
from voting as they did in 2016 to propel Trump over the top although
he decries it (wink wink). However, minority voter intimidation, as
it occurred in Georgia, Florida, and North Carolina (along with vote
theft) during the 2018 midterms, is gearing up for a rerun in 2020 as
the number of prospective minority voters is reaching unprecedented
heights throughout the nation.
The
proposed 2020 census question on citizenship is already having a
chilling consequence on the registration of Hispanic immigrants who
fear deportation whether they have green cards, have been
naturalized, or not. It is likely to have the effect that it is
designed to have as indicated by a key deceased Republican
consultant, Thomas B. Hofeller, to Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross,
who proposed it. In an exhaustive study of Texas legislative
districts, Hofeller concluded that the question “would
be advantageous to Republicans and non-Hispanic whites” due
to the decrease in the number of minority voters.
Trump’s
use of minority clergy and grassroots leaders is again on the front
burner of his 2020 campaign. After his success in outreach to
African American pastors: Cleveland Ohio’s Rev. Darrell Scott
and South Carolina’s Rev. Mark Burns (although the state has
been consistently Republican), Trump is convinced that their
deliverance of even a small slice of the black vote would prove
helpful.
More
recently, he has recruited Bishop Darrell Hines who heads the
Christian Faith Fellowship Church of God in Christ in Milwaukee,
Wisconsin. The city’s Churches of God in Christ have long been
a mainstay of Republican support as President George W. Bush visited
Holy Redeemer Institutional
Church of God in Christ there in 2002 on a victory lap
to celebrate the U.S. Supreme Court’s affirmation of school
choice. Here again, Trump is hoping for a chunk of the black vote in
Wisconsin’s largest city to assist in giving him an edge in
winning the state again. This strategy is being employed in
Democratic cities throughout the nation.
The
Trump administration’s criminal justice reform has been
carefully crafted to appeal to the sensibilities of African Americans
which he lets other high profile liberals, who are often featured in
media, trumpet on his behalf, e.g., Kim Kardashian on his parole of a
black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, from a life sentence for a
non-violent drug crime (for which she had already served more than 20
years) and Van Jones, a CNN anchor, also joined by Kim Kardashian,
who promotes his First Step Program on criminal justice reform.
Kardashian and Jones, who have given Trump effusive praise for these
acts, serve as a shield against his other enduring, noxious social
policies.
In
the interim, Trump persists in ratcheting up attacks on immigrants
and other minorities to feed and organize his Republican base to
enhance and ensure their turnout. The combination of increased
turnout of his base, a sizeable piece of independent and suburban
voters, as a result of his economic policies, and enhanced minority
voter suppression, Trump believes, will be the linchpins of his 2020
victory.
The
Democrats seem unaffected by these plots as they have done little to
nothing to rebuff them on a comprehensive scale. There are few legal
responses to voter suppression (with the exception of Stacey Abram’s
Fair Fight initiative), and no widespread organizing of communities
of color by the Democratic National Committee or the 24 presidential
candidates. Instead, these would-be presidents insist on using the
polls to guide their campaign emphases as did Hillary Clinton in
2016.
The
successes of the 2018 organizing and get-out-the-vote (GOTV) plans do
not appear to resonate with them. We have witnessed the political
outcomes of this naiveté before.
|