|
|
|
Rod
Paige could hardly wait to get to the meeting at the White
House, where all the
best lies are told. The nation’s largest teachers union is
a “terrorist
organization,” exclaimed the Education Secretary to an audience
of state governors. The place got quiet all of a sudden, and
Paige had to regroup. It was “a bad joke; it was an inappropriate
choice of words," he back-peddled to reporters. If only
George Bush had been in the room – someone to share Paige’s
wild-and-crazy-guy sense of humor.
It
is no wonder that Paige has lost his mental balance, and imagines
that the National
Education Association’s 2.7 million members are under the sway
of (Al-Gebra) terrorists. Paige’s Department of Education has
become an Alice In Wonderland lie-ocracy where not a word of
truth is spoken; where arch racists claim to be civil rights
activists, government divests itself of public schools to improve
them, and higher standards of teaching require the abolition
of teacher standards. Paige’s brain has been left behind in the
rush to privatize the nation’s schools.
Click
to view entire image
The
entire edifice of Bush education policy – every printed page and verbal utterance – is
double-speak propaganda designed to mangle the public perception
and actual workings of public education. It was inevitable that
Paige, the dim bulb at the top of the bureaucratic stairs, would
one day tumble from the hyperbolic (vouchers equal “reform”)
to the ridiculous (vouchers equal “emancipation”)
to the maniacal (the NEA is “terrorist”). People get disoriented
when they spend every waking hour turning truth on its head.
Double-speak
Bush
hammers relentlessly on the themes of educational “accountability” and “raising the
bar” of teacher standards. Yet his proposed budget “eliminates
funding for the most respected teacher certification organization
in the country and instead funnels millions to an untested certification
organization backed by friends of the Administration,” said People
for the American Way, earlier this month.
The
Bush gang is engaged in a massive fraud – a deliberate campaign to plunge the public
schools into chaos and disrepute in order to create a larger “market” for
education privateers. There is method behind the madness of No
Child Left Behind, as administered by Rod Paige and his menagerie
of covert and overt voucher contractors. While rich and poor
school districts alike struggle to make sense of NCLB-imposed
testing and performance criteria, the administration prepares
to defund the venerable National Board for Professional Teaching
Standards (NBPTS) in favor of the newly-invented,
pro-voucher, typically misnamed American Board for Certification
of Teacher Excellence (ABCTE).
Founded in 2001, ABCTE has tested only 100 people, according
to PFAW – which is, in a perverse way, understandable since the
rich right-wingers who created the entity fundamentally oppose
certification of teachers!
The fraudulent
ABCTE is the offspring of the Education
Leaders Council (ELC) and – another wild misnomer – the National
Council on Teacher Quality (NCTQ). Both owe their existences
to the fantastically deep pockets of the Wal-Mart family and
Milwaukee’s Bradley Foundation, the parents and principal paymasters
of the national voucher network. NCTQ is itself the mutant child
of ELC – the result of inbreeding among millionaire Republicans.
Proudly
displayed on the NCTQ’s website is a report from the Abell
Foundation, of Baltimore, titled “Teacher
Certification Reconsidered.” Unlike the chastened Rod Paige,
who for public consumption apologized to teachers, calling them “the
real soldiers of democracy," the Abell Foundation does not
hide its contempt for public school educators:
“There
is a scientifically sound body of research, conducted primarily
by economists and social scientists, revealing the attributes
of an effective teacher, defined as a teacher who has a positive
impact on student achievement. This research does not show
that certified teachers are more effective teachers than uncertified
teachers. In fact, the backgrounds and attributes characterizing
effective teachers are more likely to be found outside the
domain of schools of education.” (Their emphasis.)
This
is an incredibly bald statement: that the people who currently
teach school
are generally less fit to be in a classroom than folks somewhere “outside” the
system. As tempting as it might be to engage the foundation’s
argument – which is as shallow on its face as creation science
or the energy industry’s dismissals of global warming – one
should not fall into the trap. The report has only one purpose:
to justify the employment of unqualified “teachers” at taxpayer-subsidized
(vouchers) private schools.
The
authors of the report also understand that, in order for
private schools to
find a secure “market,” public education must be made to seem
pointless, wasteful – even harmful. Thus, they make a great
show of concern for urban education – the easy target. If they
can succeed in eliminating teacher standards in the public
schools, then private schools staffed with fake teachers will
seem relatively more attractive. Therefore, the Abell Foundation
proclaims that “deregulation is in order” for teachers in the
Maryland school system, and recommends the state “eliminate
coursework requirements for teacher certification.”
Certification
represents a societal standard, an essential aspect of the
social contract
that underpins not only public education, but a general commitment
to the public welfare. The Abell Foundation wants to break
that contract. Its report reflects the ideology and goals of
the financiers of the national voucher network. The report
maligns teachers in general and dismisses the very concept
of teacher certification. Yet these are the “reformers” that
George Bush has invited into the Department of Education.
Dumbing down
teachers
“We have never before
seen such a shameless disconnect between rhetoric and action,” said
People for the American Way chief Ralph Neas, summing up Bush’s
No Child Left Behind record to date. But the contradiction
exists only if one believes that the Bush men actually want
to improve public education. In reality, they are systematically
lying about the true purposes of their administration of NCLB.
This corrupt class of business-politicians wields chaos and
confusion as weapons to destabilize the public sphere – with
a cynicism so profound as to threaten civil society, itself.
New Jersey
Education Association President Edithe Fulton peeped the
larceny that
is at work. Her February
22 newspaper column is titled, “Highly qualified teachers
need not apply.”
Under the
administration’s
so-called “No Child Left Behind” act, all public school
teachers of core academic subjects (English, math, science,
foreign languages, history, geography, civics and government,
economics, and arts) must be “highly qualified” by September
2005.
“Highly qualified” means
holding at least a bachelor’s degree, and obtaining full
state certification or passing a state teacher licensing
exam. The bar is unusually high for beginning special education
teachers and middle school/high school teachers who teach
multiple subjects. They must either pass a rigorous state
test in each subject they teach or successfully complete
coursework or credentialing in each subject area. Veterans
must either do the same or demonstrate their competence
in all subjects they teach in a state evaluation.
Ironically,
under the newly enacted District of Columbia voucher law – a major
priority of the Bush administration and its allies in Congress – teachers
in private and religious schools receiving taxpayer-funded
vouchers don’t even need to possess a college degree.
Whatever
happened to “highly qualified” teachers?
The
$42 million Bush plans to lavish on ABCTE, the phony teacher
certification board,
is a cruel hoax on the nation’s students and teachers – although
Rod Paige probably considers the whole thing a great joke on
his nemesis, the “terrorist” teachers union.
Reality turned
upside-down
Lisa Graham Keegan,
head of the Education Leaders Council, claims the
DC vouchers bill “provides District residents with a new civil
right – the right to rise above mediocrity, change a failing
school system, and provide all students with access to a quality
education.” Yet the private schools clamoring for vouchers
reject standards that would show whether they are excellent,
mediocre, or worse. These schools reserve the right to accept
or reject students, and the vast majority of them have no capacity
for special education. Moreover, there is no evidence, anywhere,
that voucher schools perform better than public schools. (See “A
conversation on school vouchers,” Economic Policy Institute,
June 12, 2003.)
The
voucher conspirators are most shamefully dishonest when they
claim to wish all the
best for public education. Economist Milton Friedman, an architect
and guru of the national voucher network, gave the game away
in 1995 when he said: “Vouchers are not an end in themselves;
they are a means to make a transition from a government to
a market system.”
Friedman was a founding
patron of the Black Alliance for Educational Options
( BAEO),
the main African American voucher front group. He financed
the symposium that launched the motley outfit of political
hustlers and education product entrepreneurs in 2000, and
spent nearly a quarter of a million dollars on the BAEO’s
media coming-out party blitz in 2001. The Bradley Foundation
and the Wal-Mart (Walton) family did the heavy financial
lifting for their Black surrogates, together lavishing at
least $3 million on the BAEO in its first years of existence.
If
an alternative, rightwing political leadership ever emerges
in Black America,
its lineage will be traced directly to the rich white racists
who invented the voucher “movement.”
More
such unwanted “gifts” may
be on the way. The foundation world is abuzz with reports that
the Wal-Mart family will endow up to $20 billion to
their non-profit empire over the next few years. The family
currently spends about $100 million annually to influence the
political direction of the nation, the great bulk of it in
the education arena. If the rumors are true, the most reactionary
super-rich family in America could soon be doling out $1 billion
a year.
How
many “movements” can
that buy?
|
|
|
|
|
|