Nearly half a million people die
every year from complications from smoking. About a tenth of them
never put a cigarette to their lips – they die from exposure to
second-hand smoke. Death from tobacco is, according to the Centers
for Disease Control, the leading cause of preventable death. But too
many people, enticed by advertising, think that smoking is so "cool"
that they embrace it. And the tobacco industry spent more than $9
billion on smoking advertising, or about a million dollars an hour.
For too many, cigarettes are a
desperate addiction, encouraged by pernicious advertising. The
addiction hits folks of color – Black and brown folks --
hardest. We are more likely to be exposed to heavy advertising, more
likely to become addicted, and more likely to die from complications
of smoking addiction. Public policy can help ameliorate this
challenge, perhaps, by further restricting who can buy tobacco and
when. Because addictions start early, public policy can help by
supporting efforts underway to limit the sale of nicotine to those
who are under 21.
Instead, unfortunately, some would
prefer to restrict the sale of vaping products in particular to keep
them out of the hands of children. Why not just further limit the
sale of all tobacco products? The companies that manufacture vaping
products, like the market leader Juul, are to be commended for
attempting to protect young people from the deleterious effects of
their products. But their recently accelerated activism is only one
small step toward ensuring that young people are protected from the
harmful effects of smoking, and they cannot do it alone.
Very recently, the head of the Food
and Drug Administration, Scott Gottlieb, resigned for "family
reasons" (don't you love it when white men suddenly discover
their families when they are in hot water). At the same time, we
learned that too many chains, like Walmart, Kroger and Walgreens,
along with gas stations, are breaking the law by selling cigarettes
and other nicotine products to young people.
But here's the deal. It doesn't
make sense to regulate the sale of nicotine products, like vaping,
without looking at the sale of nicotine products, like cigarettes.
Children (yes, despite their protests, I think of anyone under 21 as
a child) shouldn't be purchasing alcohol or tobacco. Period. End of
conversation. They aren't grown. They are susceptible to addiction.
The law should protect them and penalize those who make it easy for
them to access these products.
But the law does not protect.
Instead, legislators selectively go after some products, while
protecting others. If legislators understood the damage that
nicotine and tobacco products do to people, especially young people,
they'd be rushing to outlaw them. Instead, because tobacco is big
business, the industry is protected. Furthermore, products that
attempt to ameliorate the harmful sides of smoking, like vaping, are
subjected to unreasonable scrutiny, even outlawed. To their credit,
vaping companies are owning their role in possible addiction and
standing for a ban on selling any nicotine products to children.
Part of this is personal for me.
I've written before about my mom's smoking addiction, which has led
to her developing COPD and emphysema diseases in her ninth decade.
But it's more than the personal. It's about the ways that public
policy can protect young people, even as they make poor choices.
Follow the money, goes the trope.
Who benefits from youngsters buying tobacco and nicotine products?
Why do legislators protect them? Why would legislators crack down on
vaping, but not cigarettes? Who benefits? If we follow the money,
we have to monitor the lobby. Who has power in this game?
We always need to follow the money
when we look at the ways that some products are offered to the market
and others are restricted. We always need to follow the money when
we realize that there are always beneficiaries in a society that has
predatory capitalism at its roots. We don't need more children being
exposed to addiction. We shouldn't outlaw vaping products without
outlawing the sale of tobacco to children. I appreciate some
manufacturers for joining many others in standing up against
companies like Walmart, Walgreen's and the others that are making big
dollars selling tobacco and nicotine products to children. It needs
to stop. Now. Legislators need to step up and protect our children
from this destructive addiction!
|