We
have finished our annual celebration of the national holiday honoring
the life and contributions of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. by
liberals, conservatives, and Vice President Mike Pence, alike, who
claimed that Dr. King “… inspired
us to change through the legislative process to become a more perfect
union. That’s exactly what President Trump is calling on the
Congress to do.”
After
watching him make those remarks during his interview on CBS’s
Face the Nation news
show last
Sunday, I reflected on Dr. King’s likely positions regarding
the ongoing attempts to underfund and privatize K-12 public
education. But rather than projecting my own opinions on his
education stands, I reviewed his writings and thoughts on education
issues during his life as a civil rights leader. Dr. King was
committed to quality public education for all Americans. He viewed
education as the glue that would secure the rights of both minority
and majority Americans.
He
believed that: “Schools have to be infused with a mission if
they are to be successful. The mission is clear: the rapid
improvement of the school performance of Negroes and other poor
children. If this does not happen, America will suffer for decades
to come.” He attached a special significance to education
as a liberating and essential force for African Americans. But the
essence of Dr. King, those values by which he lived, and the beliefs
and actions which led to his assassination, are the criteria by which
educators, and all of us, will be judged in the future.
The
activities and energies of those within the field of education would
benefit from a commitment to achieve the goals for which Dr. King
stood. He believed that: white children and all children of color,
irrespective of social and economic class, should attend schools
together in harmony and a spirit of brother and sister hood; that all
of them should be given an equal chance to reach their maximum
academic potential; and that there is a dream for America and all its
citizens not as it is, but for what it could become. Dr. King saw
education as a liberating force, the very cornerstone of freedom,
saying that “As long as the mind is enslaved, the body can
never be free.”
He
also noted that, “Education without social action is a
one-sided value because it has no true power potential. Social
action without education is a weak expression of pure energy. Deeds
uninformed by educated thought can take false directions.” If
he were alive today, he would surely have backed the recently settled
teachers’ strike in the Los Angeles Unified School District
(LAUSD) as he did with the strike by the Memphis sanitation workers
in 1968. Dr. King always stood with workers and their unions in his
efforts to help us develop a more perfect union.
He
would likely have been pleased that Los Angeles’ Democratic
Mayor, Eric Garcetti, brokered a deal to end the week long strike of
the United Teachers of Los Angeles (UTLA) against the pro-charter and
pro-privatization LAUSD School Board which resulted in a six percent
pay raise for teachers. But even more revealing was that “…
union leaders said that
what was perhaps more important to them was that the strike had
provided an alternate narrative to the school choice movement that
grew up around the idea that traditional public schools were
factories of failure that needed to be broken up and rethought.”
In
addition to the salary increase, the UTLA secured a cap on class
size, full-time nurses for every school, and librarians
for middle and high schools by the fall of 2020. The union also got
a commitment from the district to establish a process for reducing
the number of standardized assessments and the board agreed to vote
on a resolution calling on the state to limit the number of charter
schools. The aforementioned were the key rationales behind the
strike in the first place. These compromises are strikingly similar
to the ones won by Memphis’s sanitation workers in 1968 after
Dr. King joined their movement.
The
outcomes in Los Angeles are consistent with his vision for public
education. He believed that “Where a missionary zeal has
been demonstrated by school administrators and teachers, and when
this dedication has been backed by competence, funds and a desire to
involve parents, much has been accomplished.” Dr. King was
committed to building a beloved society. He wanted public education
to be dedicated to nurturing and transmitting basic human values as
well as knowledge. He recognized that local school systems had often
become large and complex organizations and that they had negative as
well as positive impacts, especially on low-income children and
minorities who faced a variety of social and economic challenges in
their community and neighborhood environments.
If
we are to build a new world to reach the dream so often envisioned by
Dr. King, then it is essential that K-12 public education be one of
the solutions. It must instill a respect for the dignity all
citizens, and it must develop an obligation to such basic values as
justice, equity, and order. He understood that, irrespective of the
diversity of our communities, we are all Americans. Our society is
in grave danger of being torn asunder by divisive forces that are
emboldened on a daily basis by our white nationalist President Donald
J. Trump.
|