If
America were an all-white country, we would have had universal health
care decades ago. Even though cancer, heart disease, and diabetes
are color-blind, conservative whites have consistently opposed
expanded health care access because many whites would rather be sick
than share a waiting room with African Americans. It’s as true
now with GOP politicians like U.S. Senate candidate Josh Hawley, U.S.
Rep. Mike Bost, and U.S. Rep. Ann Wagner as it was under Harry
Truman.
In
1947, intrigued by the national health care systems of World War II
allies Britain, France, and Canada, Truman proposed a national health
care system for the United States, to be administered by federally
funded hospitals. But conservative Dixiecrats from the Old
Confederacy killed the plan because it would have meant, under
federal anti-discrimination guidelines, that black and white patients
would have been treated side-by-side.
When
the brand-new Medicare system came along in 1966, U.S. Sen. John
Stennis almost shoved through an amendment that would have allowed
states to give federal Medicare money to legally segregated
hospitals. That move failed, but the following year, a white
physician, Dr. Jean Cowsert, was assassinated in Mobile, Alabama
because she demanded that hospital admissions under Medicare be based
solely on medical need, not on race.
Race
has always colored the views of conservative whites when it comes to
universal access to health care. A mammoth 2015 study by Cornell
Medical Center in New York and the University of Maine found that the
primary predictor as to whether someone opposes universal health care
is racial prejudice. It found that the prime driver for opposing
universal health care was that “pimps, welfare queens, thugs”
or any other euphemism for black people, would get a “free
ride” on the tax dollars of “hard-working (white)
people.”
When
Obamacare was being debated in Congress in 2009, opposition to the
Affordable Care Act by the Tea Party and other right-wing activists
was ostensibly because of Big Government. But the real reason was
never far below the surface, and it occasionally popped into the
daylight, as when conservative flamethrower Glenn Beck said on Fox
News in July 2009, “Everything that is getting pushed through
this Congress, including the health care bill, are transforming
America. And they are all driven by President Obama’s thinking
on one idea – reparations.”
In
the minds of the right-wing commentariat and their minions, the
Affordable Care Act wasn’t about reforming a for-profit
healthcare system driven by money and not medicine; it was about
masses of unworthy African Americans demanding free health care, to
be paid for by the oppressed, hard-working, virtuous white man. It
was John Stennis all over again, this time in high-definition.
But
a funny thing happened on the way to the new Nat Turner Rebellion.
Millions of Americans, black and white, discovered that while
Obamacare was an imperfect mess in many ways, it contained some
provisions that almost everyone loved. And at the top of the list was
the ACA’s requirement that insurance companies no longer deny
coverage to people with pre-existing medical conditions.
Nine
years after Beck’s vein-bulging reparations rant, Republicans
who have spent the better part of a decade trying to nuke Obamacare
and its pre-existing conditions coverage find themselves in the
position of the guy who murdered his parents and then threw himself
on the mercy of the court because he was an orphan. After spending
years trying to get rid of the pre-existing conditions coverage
mandate, all of them are suddenly in favor of keeping it.
The
front runner in the “who are you going to believe, me or your
lying eyes?” sweepstakes is Missouri Attorney General Josh
Hawley. Hawley, the GOP Senate candidate on November 6, filed a
lawsuit as attorney general (along with 16 other Republican AG’s),
demanding that all of the ACA, including pre-existing conditions
coverage, be declared illegal. His lawsuit, with his name firmly
attached, is still active.
But
in both a Senatorial debate and in TV ads, Hawley insists that he’s
all in favor of keeping pre-existing conditions coverage, that his
wife has a pre-existing condition, and hey, believe my TV spots, not
the lawsuit I’ve filed. Hawley, of course, is lying.
So
is U.S. Rep. Mike Bost, the Republican congressman whose 12th
Congressional District includes East St. Louis and Belleville, but
also runs down to the Ohio River and covers over a dozen white,
rural, conservative Southern Illinois counties. Bost voted to repeal
Obamacare and the pre-existing conditions coverage, and yet tweeted
last month, “Since day one in Congress, I’ve been clear
that we must protect individuals with pre-existing conditions.”
Bost,
charitably, is confused. Uncharitably, he’s a liar. He’s
even scrubbed his official website, which in 2016 said, “Obamacare
is more than a broken website. The website was just the tip of the
iceberg.” That’s now gone from his website, replaced with
“Mike believes Southern Illinoisans should have the right to
make their own health care choices.”
The
biggest bait-and-switch, though, may belong to GOP U.S. Rep. Ann
Wagner, representing the 2nd Missouri Congressional District in the
St. Louis County suburbs. Along with several other panicked
Republicans in the House, Wagner is co-sponsoring the Pre-Existing
Conditions Protection Act. Since Wagner voted four times to repeal
the ACA, including pre-existing conditions coverage, and appeared on
C-SPAN screeching “Freedom!” after voting to ok the Trump
“replacement” for Obamacare, Wagner either underwent a
conversion worthy of Saul of Tarsus on the road to Damascus, or she
saw the polls and dove for cover. Or maybe, more simply put, she’s
lying.
Across
the country, Republicans like Wagner, Bost, and Hawley were glad to
go along with the racist anti-ACA dog whistles because they played
well with their rural white, or suburban white flight, constituents.
But often as not, reality has a liberal bias. And the reality is they
are now twisted themselves into political pretzels, denying that they
spent years trying to get rid of the coverage they now claim to
support.
They’re all lying.
|