The
most recent mass shooting in America, in which Devin
Patrick Kelley
opened fire on First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas —
killing 26 and wounding 20 — once again focuses attention on
the seemingly intractable problem of gun massacres.
Kelley,
who was court-martialled by the Air Force in 2012 after committing
domestic assault on his wife and stepson, spent one year in a
military brig and in 2014 received a bad conduct discharge. Although
Kelley was ineligible to purchase firearms due to his convictions,
the Air
Force failed to report this
to the FBI. As a result, Kelley’s name did not appear in the
federal government’s database, allowing him to purchase an
assault rifle and commit mass murder. Kelley’s armed forces
background raises issues regarding the role of military training in
mass shootings, and whether that tactical experience allows them to
become more effective shooters. The stress associated with
deployments also raises questions about the possible links between
post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and mass shootings for these
men when they return home from military service.
“There
are some people — a very tiny, tiny percentage — whose
combat experience creates some mental instability, along with other
factors like drugs and alcohol, that then may contribute to lethal
violence stateside,” Shoba Sreenivasan, a University of
Southern California psychology professor, told the San Diego
Union-Tribune.
The
links between military experience and mass violence are nothing new.
For example, the Ku Klux Klan — America’s original
domestic terror group — was founded by Confederate veterans.
The Confederate general Nathan
Bedford Forrest,
the founder and first grand wizard of the Klan, was responsible for
the Battle of Fort Pillow in Tennessee in April 1864, the massacre
of over 300 Black Union soldiers
after they had already surrendered. In the years following the Civil
War, a time of dramatic levels of violence, two-thirds of
men sent to prison
in the North were veterans.
Although
many mass shooters are not veterans, the fact remains that those who
have served in the military disproportionately commit these acts. The
list
of veterans who
became mass killers is an “impressively long” one, notes
George Washington University anthropology and international affairs
professor Hugh Gusterson in Sapiens in 2016. Some of these
individuals include Timothy McVeigh, Persian Gulf War veteran and
perpetrator of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing that killed 168 people,
and Wade
Michael Page,
the white supremacist who was radicalized on a North Carolina Army
base, and who killed six people at a Wisconsin Sikh temple. In 2009,
Major Nidal Malik Hasan, a U.S. Army psychiatrist, killed 13 during a
shooting spree at Fort Hood, Texas, military-trained Micah
Xavier Johnson —
an outgoing person who became a hermit after serving as a corporal in
Afghanistan, and was reportedly disappointed
with the military
following his discharge — killed six police officers by sniper
fire in Dallas in 2016.
A
2015 report
from the Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC) estimates that 300
veterans are currently on death ro or 10 percent of all death row
inmates. More than 1 million veterans of the wars in Vietnam,
Afghanistan, and the Middle East have returned with PTSD symptoms,
and while most veterans live exemplary lives, the report notes, “for
a small but significant number, their mental wounds contributed to
their committing acts of violence and they are now on death row. Many
others with similar problems have already been executed.” While
many death row veterans suffer from PTSD or other mental disabilities
exacerbated or caused by combat duty, often when these vets stood
trial and faced a death sentence, “their military service and
related illnesses were barely presented to the jury.” DPIC
found it disturbing that so many emotionally and mentally scarred veterans
with war-related trauma face execution.
A
2014 Washington Post and Kaiser Family Foundation survey
of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans found that one-third said their
mental health was worse than it was before they served, with nearly a
half saying the same of their physical health. Nearly half reported
sudden outbursts of anger, and only 12 percent said they were
mentally and physically better now than before active duty. As Ann
Jones wrote in The Nation, an increasing number of veterans are
returning home “stuck
in combat mode,”
as if they were in “enemy territory” or on a private
mission, and had gotten into the habit of killing and had become
skilled at it.
“Since
2002, soldiers and veterans have been committing murder individually
and in groups, killing wives, girlfriends, children, fellow soldiers,
friends, acquaintances, complete strangers, and — in appalling
numbers — themselves,” Jones said. One poignant example
she cited were the first Afghanistan veterans who returned to Fort
Bragg, North Carolina, in 2002. Soon after, four of the vets murdered
their wives and took their own lives. By 2005, the military base had
experienced ten domestic violence fatalities, while soldiers in
western Washington state committed seven murders and three suicides.
Between December 2007 and September 2008, male soldiers at Fort Bragg
and the neighboring Camp Lejeune Marine base murdered four military
women, while 15 deaths of women killed under suspicious circumstances
overseas in combat zones had been categorized as “suicide”
or “non-combat related.”
A
2008 investigation by the New York Times found “more
than 150 cases
of fatal domestic violence or child abuse in the United States
involving service members and new veterans during the wartime period
that began in October 2001 with the invasion of Afghanistan.”
The
PTSD which impacts veterans who have been to war manifests itself in
violence, as the metal
detector and
armed police officer in every VA Hospital suggests. As Slate
reported, wars and elevated crime rates are closely related, as if
the wartime license to kill lowers the bar in civilian life, and
makes murder an acceptable means of settling everyday conflicts.
Writing for Slate, David J Morris, a veteran who has struggled with
PTSD, said that the notion PTSD has nothing to do with violence back
at home is part of a “support
the troops”
campaign by VA psychiatrists and veterans advocates who claim that
associating PTSD with mass shootings does veterans a disservice.
However, Morris points to the Army’s 2nd Battalion, 12th
Infantry unit (2-12), which was based in Dora, one of the deadliest
neighborhoods in Baghdad, Iraq. When they returned to Fort Carson,
Colorado, the unit became associated with a crime spree, with a
doubling of the murder rate around the base, and a tripling of rapes,
and eleven murders — with two soldiers killed and three charged
with murder. The PTSD rate for the 2-12 unit was more than three
times greater than that of a comparable unit that had served in a
less violent area of Iraq.
Describing
the phenomenon of violence among military veterans as “warrior
killings,” Morris said these men fit into a pattern of
“rambunctious” underachievers in school who join the
military and find trouble with their superior officers. They go off
to war and are exposed to high levels of violence, then return home
and develop a drug habit, in part to cope with the trauma of war. The
result is a series of violent incidents and financial troubles, then,
high, drunk and out of control, an altercation with another soldier
that leads to a death.
“It
is impossible to say for sure what drove these young men to commit
murder, but the idea that combat exposure and post-traumatic stress
could be contributing factors makes sense if you look at war for what
it is at the grunt level: murder that has been sanctioned by the
government,” Morris wrote. “The simple fact is that war
poisons some men’s souls, and we aren’t doing our
veterans any favors by pretending that war is only about honor and
service and sacrifice and by insisting that PTSD is completely
unrelated to the problem of postwar violence. It’s not only
morally irresponsible, it’s scientifically inaccurate,”
he added.
America
has a toxic mix of guns
and anger,
with a risk for impulsive gun-related violence increasing when anger,
depression or substance abuse is added to the equation, as the Dallas
Morning news reported. Further, as one forensic
psychologist
noted, there is an “anger mismanagement” problem among
violent offenders such as mass killers, “pathological anger,
rage, resentment and embitterment.” Cognitive
behavior therapy
is one means, along with other programs and counseling services to
help impulsively angry young people with antisocial behavior manage
stress and control their emotional responses, and prevent them from
taking up guns. Further, domestic
violence
is the canary in the coal mine for mass shootings, as 54 percent of
mass shootings between 2009 and 2016 involved family or domestic
violence. Domestic abuse is a problem in the military, with combat
veterans responsible for 21
percent of domestic violence
nationwide — linked to PTSD. Yet, the U.S. military is
reporting
almost no abusers
to the FBI gun background check system. If society has any hope of
addressing and combating the issue of mass shootings among military
veterans, it must address these underlying issues of war, violence,
anger and trauma, and fight them head-on.
This commentary was originally published by AtlantaBlackStar
|