Political
Misogyny of a NJ Political Boss: Political misogyny has
been aggressively employed as a political strategy in the 2016
elections in state and federal elections. But George
Norcross, South Jersey Democratic political boss, is an
exemplary model of its hard-nosed application that is representative
of the nation. Norcross has directed his political lackeys to
attack teachers and female legislators who refused to carry out his
orders and/or inhibited his empire building in the educational and
political sectors. Using New Jersey’s 5th Legislative District
as his base, he has used former New Jersey Sen. Wayne Bryant (for
whom the collaboration ended badly and is now being rehabilitated);
former New Jersey Assembly Speaker Joe Roberts; his current
marionette, New Jersey Senate President Steve Sweeney; a host of
public-sector, corporate, and union leaders; and other Democratic
politicians across the state via coercion, deal making, and massive
campaign contributions. For example:
Norcross
blocked (with Speaker Roberts’s help) then New Jersey’s
Assembly Majority Leader (and now New Jersey’s 12th
District Congresswoman) Bonnie Watson-Coleman from ascending to the
Speakership in 2010, when she would have become the first African
American female Speaker in the history of the state, because she
refused to be on call to carry his political water. She was quickly
replaced by another African American female, Assemblywoman Sheila
Oliver, who served until 2014. However, Norcross organized a coup
attempt to replace Oliver as Speaker with Majority Leader, Joseph
Cryan, in mid-term in 2011, because she also declined to be
Norcross’s puppet in “all political matters” (as
he has recently done successfully to remove Sen. Nia Gil as Chair of
the Senate’s Commerce Committee, also replacing her with
another woman of color). During the coup attempt, Watson-Coleman
let the leadership know that she would publicly oppose Oliver’s
removal, citing the racial implications, and the mutineers backed
off when they could not build a sufficient coalition.
In
Camden, Latina State Sen. Nilsa Cruz-Perez was banished to the
political wilderness by Norcross in 2005 after she ran for Mayor
against his wishes. After a nearly ten-year penance, Norcross
resurrected her in 2014 after his brother, Donald Norcross, moved on
to the U.S. Congress, representing New Jersey’s 1st
District, replacing another Norcross flunky, Bob Andrews.
On
the education front, Norcross has directed his hand-picked
Superintendent, Paymon Rouhanifard, of the Camden City Schools to
file tenure charges against dozens of Camden teachers, the majority
of whom are minority, to force them into retirement or risk being
terminated in his ongoing strategy to convert Camden into New
Orleans. When they didn’t leave soon enough, Rouhanifard
threatened them with losing their pension rights. Three of them
(Margaret, Delores, and Renee, {pseudonyms}) who had taught for
several decades first retained private legal representation but
caved in under the Superintendent’s intense pressure.
Norcross
has been effective in his practice of political misogyny to date and
is now moving on to misandry (disrespect and intimidation of male
Democratic officials) who disobey his dictates. But Democrats are
beginning to chafe under his brass knuckled political leadership and
are unifying to overthrow him.
In
his Gettysburg address last week, Donald Trump who billed his speech
as a focus on policy went off script again. Unable to control his
narcissistic and vindictive impulses, he rambled at the beginning of
his speech stating that all eleven of the females accusing him of
sexual assault were liars and that he would sue them after the
election. As he did in the three presidential debates, he
continually steps on his own message with bizarre statements. Trump
accused his first complainant, Jessica Leeds, of being too ugly for
him to “grab her p***y” on a plane in 1981 as she
alleged. He also implied that his latest indicter, Jessica Drake,
who says “he grabbed and kissed her in 2005 without her
permission,” was lying based on the fact that she worked in
the porn industry and was likely touched all the time.
Due
to the rise of women in the political arena to compete for power,
misogyny has enveloped nearly all the races where women are running
against men. Pennsylvania’s Katie McGinty, who is opposing the
incumbent U.S. Republican Senator Pat Toomey, has been labeled “not
likeable” (another nasty woman) by Republican operatives as
she has led and/or kept it close in recent polls. Rather than being
criticized on her policy agenda, she has been mostly disparaged based
on her gender as being too pushy. Former Nevada Democratic
Attorney General Catherine Cortez Matos, vying for the open seat of
retiring Democratic Sen. Harry Reid against Republican Congressman
Joe Heck, has been pilloried because of her strong stance against
Donald Trump.
However,
public school teachers are in the bullseye of misogyny during the
2016 election season. The Cartel of corporate education reformers
has aimed their corporate might at their salaries, pensions, and
benefits from coast to coast. And as teachers are fighting against
these grave threats to their very existence as a profession, the
Cartel is advancing new money-making schemes to line its pockets.
The
Obama Administration opened the door wider for public school
privatization: the entry of corporate and virtual charters, teacher
evaluation via students’ standardized test scores, and
excessive testing, much of which is online, facilitating a
collaboration between the world’s largest test maker, Pearson,
and the global technology company, Microsoft, that spent a quarter
billion dollars lobbying for Common Core and its associated tests.
Now the Common Core tests are loaded onto the Microsoft Surface
Tablet, purchased by hundreds of school districts, making both
companies even richer. With Obama’s replacement of No Child
Left Behind (NCLB) with the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA),
these same companies are licking their chops for another financial
windfall.
A
key feature of ESSA is “personalized learning,” with its
“dashboard” for monitoring student progress. Here again,
technology will be the major factor in the teaching and learning
process, frequently supplanting and punishing teachers for their
alleged failures. Never mind that there is a huge digital divide
between poor and middle-class students in terms of access to the
internet. Teacher unions appear to have signed off on ESSA, but three
questions need to be raised: Who will pay for student internet
access outside of school? Will distressed school districts receive
sufficient state and federal funding to carry out this initiative,
and how will it be guaranteed? Will teachers still be evaluated on
students’ progress scores and/or benchmarks?
Currently,
35 states are providing less overall state funding for education in
2014 than in 2008 (during the housing recession) according
to a study
released last week by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
In 27 of those states, per capita student funding also fell during
this period. With drastic funding cuts in Oklahoma and the drafting
of a bill to defund public education in Kansas, who will pay for the
rosy ESSA scenario? In addition, the most severe cuts have occurred
in the states headed by Republican governors who have also
significantly lowered taxes which further limits the ability of
states to properly fund public education even if there is a desire to
do so. It has gotten so bad in Kansas and Oklahoma that teacher
unions are suing the states, and teachers are running for office in
an attempt to make change from the inside. Furthermore, Donald Trump
has already stated that he wants to make urban school districts
voucher districts.
As
noted in earlier columns, teachers, who are overwhelmingly women, are
victims of misogyny from multiple directions—job security,
pensions, benefits, workplace conditions, etc. They must actively
participate in the state and federal 2016 elections and closely
monitor whoever wins as if their professional lives depend on the
outcome because they do!
|