New
Jersey Updates:
Lawrence Hamm, a long-time Montclair resident, received the 2016
Human and Civil Rights Award at the National Education Association’s
(NEA’s) Delegate Assembly during the July 4th weekend for his advocacy for public education. It is ironic that he
is from the same city where Don Katz, an entrepreneur who profits
from public school privatization; Jon Schnur, a consultant for the
corporate education reform Cartel; and the current majority on the
Montclair School Board (MSB), that is promoting the privatization of
public education, also reside. A showdown appears to be imminent.
Jersey
City Mayor Steve Fulop met with several anti-Sen. Steve Sweeney
groups in Camden County last week, hoping to establish a
get-out-the-vote beachhead for his 2017 gubernatorial candidacy in
the heart of Sweeney’s base in an effort to undermine Sweeney’s
prospective entry into the race.
As
articulated in President Obama’s address at the memorial
service last Tuesday for the five Dallas police officers, who were
killed by a sniper, “…
police are being asked to do too much …serving as parents,
social workers, mental health and drug counselors, …”
The
same can be said of teachers who are being requested to overcome
major social obstacles in order to educate low-income students.
Moreover, these challenges may ebb and flow on a daily basis:
dysfunctional family settings; domestic violence; drug, gang, and
community violence; and physical and sexual abuse.
At
the same time, teacher requirements are being held rigid for
traditional public school teachers while being lowered for their
counterparts in charter, voucher, and partnership schools; teachers
are being evaluated via students’ standardized test scores;
teachers’ pensions and benefits are being under-funded and
reduced in scope by state governments at the same time teacher
contributions are being increased; and escalating poverty is having a
negative impact on students’ academic possibilities and
outcomes.
Teacher
Requirements:
Requirements for regular, certified teacher credentials have been
stiffened in recent years. Public school teachers have to have
and/or achieve a “highly qualified” status in the
subjects they teach in a specified time frame. But exceptions are
made for Teach for America (TFA) teachers in traditional public
schools and those teachers in private-sector oriented voucher,
charter, and partnership schools.
TFA
teachers, who are allegedly high achievers recruited from the best
Ivy League and state universities, who have almost no training in
K-12 education teaching methods, and who have limited background in
the subjects they are hired to teach, are given a five-week boot camp
and placed in the most demanding classrooms. Upwards of
ninety-percent leave the profession after two years.
Since
none are eligible for the “highly-qualified” designation
and would be obligated to pursue it, an amendment was authored by
Sens. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Tom Harkin (D-IA) and attached to
the bill to reopen the federal government after the 2013 shutdown.
The bill provides TFA teachers a two-year grace period to meet the
“highly qualified” standard, when most would have already
left teaching, before they would have to comply.
Thus,
TFA teachers are essentially deemed “highly qualified”
when they begin their short K-12 careers. Teachers in voucher
schools were initially not required to have a college degree, and
several states have passed or proposed legislation that a certain
percentage of charter school teachers not be held to the standards of
traditional public school teachers. These exceptions are also in
effect for partnership schools which are a hybrid of public and
charter schools.
Teacher
Evaluation:
The most dastardly plot against regular public school teachers is
the employment of teacher evaluation schemes based on the Partnership
for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) and the
Common Core principles. Both use students’ standardized test
scores to assess teacher performance and to drive them from the
profession, with a particular focus on veteran teachers who have high
salaries. This evaluation process continues to be pursued despite
the fact that this approach has been found to be deeply flawed by a
number of top education researchers.
Teacher
Pensions and Benefits:
Perhaps the most adverse impact on teachers has been the legislative
manipulation of their pensions and benefits. Numerous states (NJ,
NC, WI, GA, PA, etc.) have under-funded state contributions to
teachers’ pension and benefits for years while raising teacher
contributions. These changes have resulted in teachers having lower
take-home pay even when they have received raises in their new
contracts. And the teacher contributions are tiered so that they
continue to rise with years of experience when no raises are
forthcoming.
For
example, a Wisconsin teacher couple, with Masters Degrees and ten
years of experience, had combined after-tax pay in 2014 that was
$10,000 less than it was the previous year. Similar outcomes are
happening in New Jersey and North Carolina. Prior to the
implementation of these new regulations, thousands of teachers in the
respective states opted to retire in order to protect their existing
pensions and benefits. The state governments’ ultimate goals
are to change teacher pensions from a defined benefit to a 401K and
to reduce health benefits for retirees. Steady progress is being
made on both fronts across the nation.
Escalating
Poverty:
However, the growth and concentration of poverty in urban and rural
districts is exacerbating all of the social ills outlined above. In
a recent study by Professors Seth Pollack and Barbara Wolfe at the
University of Wisconsin-Madison, it was found that
children
… — especially those growing up in poverty — could
experience delayed brain development that significantly harms their
educational progress ….” This
study
“…is part of a growing body of socioeconomic brain
research documenting … poverty’s most insidious damage.”
Furthermore,
the researchers “…
have found that poverty can cause structural changes in areas of the
brain associated with school readiness skills”
and that “…
parts of the brain are susceptible to circumstances often present in
poor households, including stress, unstable housing, nutritional
deficiencies, low academic stimulation and irregular access to health
care.”
Lead
poisoning, which is prevalent in every poor urban school district in
the nation, adds an extra level of risk for teaching and learning.
And no state legislature or school board is factoring this reality
into the contemporary education equation. It is particularly
egregious in Newark and Camden, New Jersey; Robeson and Jones County,
North Carolina; Milwaukee and Racine, Wisconsin; Washington, D.C.;
Denver, Colorado; and numerous others.
Therefore,
teachers are placed in an impossible situation whereby they are
required, if not mandated, to overcome the poverty of their students
while they are denied the resources necessary to even begin to
address this issue. While under-resourced, they are held to the
highest standards and demonized for not meeting them. In addition,
white teachers in poor majority-minority districts are often
subjected to harsh criticism and falsely accused of having low
expectations for students of color.
In
the meantime, the corporate education Cartel has been instrumental in
reducing funding for traditional public education, forcing
legislators, via campaign contributions, to send more public dollars
to corporate coffers. Teachers are the scapegoats for all that ails
public education. In addition, they have been victimized of late by
both Republican and Democratic elected officials at the local, state,
and national levels—their erstwhile so-called friends and
supporters.
|