Once
again, the “Palestinian question” arises in the highest
level of U.S. politics, namely in one of the two major parties, this
time from black Democrats, urging the Democratic National Committee
to maintain the same language in the party platform as in 2012,
regarding U.S.-Israel relations.
The
letter, generated by Bakari Sellers, a 31-year-old South Carolina
lawyer and occasional CNN commentator, is a direct refutation to
Senator Bernie Sanders’ call for a more even-handed approach to
the relations between Israel and the occupied Palestinians.
Sellers,
in the letter, stated that he believed that the Democratic Party
platform of four years ago was “carefully crafted” and
should remain the policy of the party for any dealings with Israel or
the Palestinians.
The
letter writers, for example, vehemently opposed the use of the term
“occupation” to describe the conditions under which
Palestinians live out their days, both in the West Bank and the Gaza
Strip. And that does not take into account the conditions under
which Israeli Palestinians live. In this aspect, there is a second
class in Israel and the Palestinians and others are in it, even the
ones who serve in the Knesset. If one chooses to ignore these
aspects of the governance of Israel, it is indeed the most democratic
society in the Middle East, but the democratic rights are only
enjoyed by those who are of the Jewish faith.
The
signatories of the letter apparently also believe that the
“settlements” in the West Bank do not constitute
occupation, even though that region has been acknowledged as
Palestinian land and, if there ever were a chance for a two-state
settlement, that is the land that Palestinians would occupy. The
settlements, however, have chopped up the West Bank over the years in
such a way that there never would be a contiguous landmass that would
be considered Palestine. They also do not consider Gaza to be
occupied, even though entry and exit are controlled in every way by
Israel, through the Israel Defense Force. Everything in and out of
the Strip is controlled by Israel, including people, food, medicines,
and construction materials. It has been described as gigantic
open-air prison that contains 1.5 million people. That could be
considered occupation, as well.
Cornel
West, academic, philosopher, social activist, champion of human
rights, and a member of the Democratic platform drafting committee,
declared that the Democratic Party for too long has not “take(n)
seriously the humanity of the Palestinian brothers and sisters.”
After a half-century, in which government after government in the
U.S. and the U.K. have failed to achieve any settlement of the
conflict, which has effectively cut off hundreds of thousands of
Palestinians from their homes and lands. They have been refugees in
their own land for the past three generations.
The
Sellers letter also declares that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel,
without consideration of the millennia-old traditions that it is the
Holy City for the three oldest monotheistic religions: Christianity,
Islam, and Judaism. Together, they make up some 54 percent of the
world’s religious believers. That’s a declaration that
most groups of 60 politicians would be hesitant to make on behalf of
that many people, but the signatories did it, adhering strictly to
the philosophy of Hillary Clinton and her representatives on the
platform drafting committee.
Failure
over generations by U.S. negotiators to provide any relief for the
Palestinians has given rise to the BDS movement: Boycott, Divestment,
and Sanctions. The goal of the movement is to bring Israel,
especially its Right Wing government, to the table to resolve the
humanitarian debacle that exists in the region. It is doing so by
urging rank-and-file citizens of various countries (the U.S., in
particular) not to buy Israeli products that are made in the occupied
territories. For some, it included other Israeli products, but
overall, it is a citizens’ movement that is meant to encourage
Israel to come to terms with its most important social, economic, and
political problem.
That,
however, has brought the wrath of the powers that be in both the U.S.
and Israel on to the heads of BDS supporters. Probably the most
powerful condemnation of the BDS movement has come as an accusation
of anti-Semitism: If you are critical of Israel in any way, you are
an anti-Semite. And, the Sellers letter again raises the specter of
anti-Semitism. In the letter, the signatories declare that
anti-Semitism “has taken a new form,” the BDS movement.
In stating that, they have taken the side of Clinton, who told a
meeting of the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)
earlier this year that she would do everything in her power to defeat
the BDS movement. That is, she, if elected president, (along with
other politicians across the country) would do everything in her
power to silence the citizens right to free speech, assembly, and
association in defeating BDS.
Senator
Bernie Sanders simply had suggested in his Democratic primary
campaigning that the U.S. have a more even-handed approach to the
problem, certainly the biggest issue in Israel. He never said a word
about “delegitimizing” Israel or undermining Israel’s
right to exist, but that is the assertion of those who are bound to
destroy the BDS movement. There are plenty of voices inside Israel
that want the situation resolved, but the government in power right
now has said it will not countenance a two-state solution, which it
sees as just as bad or worse than a one-state solution. Where is
there to go?
The
surprise here is that 60 black Democratic politicians have taken such
a position, unless they do not believe that the Palestinians’
situation is a human rights violation of monumental proportions.
After all, the signers are the beneficiaries of centuries of struggle
to be free. They know that in the U.S., and they have seen the
effectiveness of the boycott movement of apartheid South Africa. Why
is it that they can’t see the similarities in the BDS movement?
It may be because they don’t see Palestinians as entitled to
basic human and civil rights. We may hope not, but that’s the
way the Democratic Party seems to be headed.
|