Seeking
to profit from a death you caused - by auctioning the gun that
you used to kill a black teenager, for instance - is a true
sign of a lost soul. That someone might actually want to buy that gun
is a sign of deeper, unresolved issues of racial violence and gun
worship in American society, and the enabling power the gun lobby
exerts over unhinged individuals.
George
Zimmerman, the self-proclaimed neighborhood watch volunteer acquitted
three years ago for the fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin in Sanford,
Florida, tried
Thursday to auction the gun he used to kill the teen,
reportedly at a starting bid of $5,000. While the post
disappeared from the auction site as bidding was slated to
begin, and has now been reposted elsewhere - according to a report
by CNN's Polo Sandoval, who interviewed the man who registered the
new domain (UnitedGunGroup.com) - the implications of
Zimmerman's actions remain the same.
Not
only was he confident of robust interest from buyers for this weapon
but he was also unapologetically eager to valorize its symbolism. In
his original auction post, Zimmerman called the weapon a "piece
of American history" and declared,"I am honored and humbled
to announce the sale of an American firearm icon." He added:
"The firearm for sale is the firearm that was used to defend my
life and end the brutal attack from Trayvon Martin on 2/26/2012."
Also
according to the original post, Zimmerman planned to use proceeds of
the sale to "fight (Black Lives Matter) violence against law
enforcement officers." This wording caters to like-minded
individuals - potential buyers, in this case - who see
Zimmerman's case and its elevation of Stand Your Ground laws as a
flashpoint in what they believe to be an organized effort against law
enforcement (and white people).
Zimmerman
is right that his gun is a powerful symbol - of the risks posed
to people of color by whites, not the other way around. The death of
Trayvon Martin surfaced the racial dimensions of Stand Your Ground,
which is used - as it was by Zimmerman - to justify white
people killing people of color. Zimmerman, who claimed self-defense
in the killing of the 17-year old Martin, ignited a firestorm over
the implementation of Stand
Your Ground laws in Florida and elsewhere across the
country. Typically, the law, which was introduced in Florida in 2005,
allows a person to use deadly force when faced with deadly force,
without a duty to retreat, in order to "prevent death or great
bodily harm."
We
should not forget the significance of the recent history that
Zimmerman is trying to gloss over for profit. On the eve of the birth
of #BlackLivesMatter in 2013 and 2014, civil rights organizations,
anti-violence groups and others pointed to Trayvon Martin's 2012
death as proof that it was open season on African-American men and
boys by police and self-deputized, individual actors alike. This
law, they
insisted, was meant for the benefit of whites, and causes men of
color to live in fear.
As
the Urban Institute found
in 2014, white-on-black homicides were 354% more likely to be
ruled justified than white-on-white killings. Further, while
homicides that invoked Stand Your Ground were found justified in 78%
of the cases with black or Latino victims, only 56% of cases
involving white victims were ruled similarly justified.
This
is not true self-defense, but a license to engage in racial violence,
over and over again.
Michael
Dunn, killed Jordan Davis, 17, another black teen, in 2013. And a
white man in South Carolina, James Loftis, 39, is free under Stand
Your Ground after shooting
and burning to death Guma Oz Dubar, 45, a Black taxi driver and
father. Loftis claims that his life was threatened when Dubar drove
him home and the cab driver and another man demanded large sums of
money from him.
Meanwhile,
the NRA and others continued
to push for Stand Your Ground and other extreme laws -
not in the interest of public safety, but to allow people to take
matters into their own hands, and using racially charged language
invoking imagery of the black criminal, "thug" or
"gangbanger" from which whites must be protected.
From
laws justifying vigilante killings and permitting the arming
of students on college campuses, to the reinvention of
children's nursery rhymes by inserting a firearm narrative, the gun
lobby is still fetishizing guns to promote its extremist point of
view. And in the United States, that culture of violence is
inextricably linked with racism.
Because
it isn't just recent history Zimmerman seeks to profit from. The
auctioning of a gun as a souvenir - as if it is a proud moment in
history of which you should want to be a part - hearkens back
to the Jim Crow era, a time when lynchings were not only a form of
race-based violence but also of entertainment and spectacle. Tickets
were sold to the events and families had picnic outings, while
photographs and postcards of the grisly murder were taken as
souvenirs. Sometimes, even the body parts of the victim's
bullet-riddled beaten, mutilated corpse, including the genitalia,
were given
to spectators as souvenirs, as a trophy.
George
Zimmerman's 9 mm pistol is his trophy, a souvenir he wants to bestow
upon someone as evidence of the supposedly great thing he
accomplished when he killed Trayvon Martin. His own delusions of
grandeur aside, Zimmerman has been in
nothing but trouble since he took Trayvon Martin's life.
And
anyone who buys his weapon — whether today or in the future —
will be purchasing a souvenir of hate.
This commentary originally appeared on CNN.com
|