|
|
|
|
|
Harriet Tubman
Economic Freedom Fighter
"I suppose we have to reconcile ourselves
to progress at a snail’s pace, to symbolism,
not substance. Still, the image our economic
freedom fighter on the twenty-dollar bill will
be inspirational for all of us, especially for
the young people who don’t know all of the
sordid details of our history of enslavement."
|
|
When
Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew announced that Harriet Tubman would grace
the new $20 bill, my heart sang hallelujah. Additional changes to
the currency were also announced. The back of the $10 will now
recognize the five leaders of the women’s suffrage movement and the
back of the $5 bill to recognize civil rights leaders, and honor
historic events from the Lincoln Memorial. The faces on our money will
no longer be all pale and male, and that’s progress.
It is especially fitting that Harriet Tubman grace the $20, since she
was an economic freedom fighter. She is credited with ushering
more than 300 people out of enslavement, many of them family members
from the state of Maryland. She hit slaveholders in the
pocketbook, costing them billions of today’s dollars. If the
average enslaved person sold for $1000 (which is about right for 1860),
then the 300 she freed cost $300,000 in 1860 dollars, or about $8.8
billion in today’s dollars. That’s quite a blow for a
slaveholding society to absorb. Every time an enslaved person ran
away, they struck a blow for freedom, and a blow against the economic
stability of the South.
Enslavement was at the root of the development of contemporary US
capitalism. Black lives were the collateral that plantation owners used
to purchase more land, to purchase more slaves, to purchase equipment,
to expand. Enslaved people were, in many ways, a form of
currency. Harriett Tubman gracing the $20 makes perfect sense.
The new $10 is supposed to be available in 2020, nearly four years from
now. The new $20 may not be available until 2030. The
design and production schedule have to be approved by the Federal
Reserve Board. That shouldn’t be much of a challenge – Fed
Chairman Janet Yellen has hailed the decision to put Harriet Tubman on
the $20, and many have applauded the other elements of currency
design. Perhaps the Fed can be lobbied to speed the production
schedule up. I can’t wait to cash a check and ask for my money in
“Harriets”.
As exciting as the currency design is, it is a symbolic, not a
substantive change. Real change would close the income gap
between men and women. Real change would close the racial
economic gap. Real change would take a look at the reparations
issue. In this last year of his Presidency, President Obama could
use his executive order to appoint a commission to look into issues of
racial economic justice. He could make an amazing, if belated,
contribution by bringing the reparations issue to the economic
forefront. The Black Lives Matter community has raised the
reparations issue with both Democratic Presidential candidates Hillary
Clinton and Bernie Sanders. President Obama would do his
successor a favor by starting the public work on this key issue.
I suppose we have to reconcile ourselves to progress at a snail’s pace,
to symbolism, not substance. Still, the image our economic
freedom fighter on the twenty-dollar bill will be inspirational for all
of us, especially for the young people who don’t know all of the sordid
details of our history of enslavement. I hope that as we talk
about Harriet Tubman on the money, we also talk about the economic
impact she had on the institution of slavery by freeing those 300
people. This is part of the history we must never forget, and
Tubman’s presence on the $20 will help us to remember.
The most exciting thing about the presence of Harriet Tubman on the $20
is way change came about. The public was engaged. Hundreds
of thousands of people signed petitions, and participated with some of
the online polls that various groups sponsored. The Treasury
Secretary asked for public input, and he got it! He says he was
surprised about the amount of input that he got. He should not
have been. Both women and men were passionate about changing
symbols of supremacy, ridding the currency of Andrew Jackson whose role
in the oppression of Native Americans was shameful, including women on
the currency. Perhaps this passion of symbolism can be
converted in passion for substance. Perhaps we can use currency
change to trigger a substantive movement for economic justice.
|
BC Editorial Board Member Dr. Julianne Malveaux, PhD (JulianneMalveaux.com)
is the Honorary Co-Chair of the Social Action Commission of Delta Sigma
Theta Sorority, Incorporated and serves on the boards of the Economic
Policy Institute as well as The Recreation Wish List Committee of
Washington, DC. A native San Franciscan, she is the President and
owner of Economic Education a 501 c-3 non-profit headquartered in
Washington, D.C. During her time as the 15th President of Bennett
College for Women, Dr. Malveaux was the architect of exciting and
innovative transformation at America’s oldest historically black
college for women. Contact Dr. Malveaux and BC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
is published every Thursday |
Executive Editor:
David A. Love, JD |
Managing Editor:
Nancy Littlefield, MBA |
Publisher:
Peter Gamble |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|