The
poisoning of the children of Flint, Michigan, along with all of the
other residents of that beleaguered city, is a wake-up call for the
entire nation, that the water we drink every day and use for cooking
and bathing could be harmful, if not deadly.
Take,
for example, the plight of a small village in eastern New York, not
far from the Vermont border. Hoosick Falls, population 3,501, is a
village in turmoil. Until a short time ago, they were told that
their water was fine to drink. In the past two weeks, all levels of
government have been scrambling to find a solution to the problem and
the people have been warned not to drink or use the water. Instead,
they have been using bottled water and a filtration system is being
installed for the entire village.
The
problem? Their water supply is contaminated with perfluorooctanoic
acid (PFOA), a hazardous, non-naturally occurring chemical that was
for years used in the manufacture of non-stick cooking surfaces. The
plant, bought by Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics in 1999, is now
declared a state superfund site. As such, there will be money to
mitigate the problem, but not necessarily eliminate the problem of
PFOA in the ground, which may have infiltrated the ground water and
local individual water wells.
PFOA
has been used in a number of products, but is most easily recognized
as one of the ingredients in Teflon, the famous non-stick material
for household pots and pans, but it’s used (or has been used) in
many other products. PFOA persists indefinitely in the environment.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set a non-enforceable limit
of 400 parts per trillion (ppt).
The
recent rush to analyze and then mitigate the danger of PFOA in
Hoosick Falls all started when a man who grew up in the village
believed there to have been excess cases of cancer, including in his
own family. He had his own tap water tested and found there to be 540
ppt of PFOA. When Saint-Gobain tested the ground water under its
plant, it found 18,000 ppt. (the EPA standard of 400 parts per
trillion is about 4 teaspoons in enough water to fill a 10-mile
string of rail tankers, the AP reported), and the test location is
just 500 yards from the village’s water wells, according to the
Associated Press. The EPA in December issued a warning not to drink
the water, but until that time, village residents were told the water
was safe to drink.
At
this time, the dangerous levels of PFOA are still being studied, but
all of the residents of the village are concerned about the health
and safety of their children and all of their families. The concern
also is for the value of their properties and the value of the
village, itself. If people want to move, the concern is how will
they get their equity from a life’s work, their homes, to start
anew?
In
Flint, the blame rests squarely on the shoulders of the governor and
his administration, which apparently cared little for the people of
the city and, while it will be difficult to prove that racism played
the largest part in letting the toxins flow to city residents, racism
(the city is 51 percent black) was doing its ugly work. In Hoosick
Falls, where the vast majority of the population is white, the
problem is the persistence of the toxin that is present and likely
the main factor of the excessive rate of cancer.
In the
New York village, the problem is the long-term effect of PFOA on
people young and old, and that may have to play out over a period of
years, while in Flint, the effect of lead on children is the primary
concern. Medical experts have said that they can remove the lead
from the body, but the damage that was done in the year in which they
were being poisoned by lead in the water cannot be undone. And that
damage includes lower IQ, behavioral problems, learning problems, and
stunted growth, among other serious problems.
The
problem in both places and the problem in every city and village and
other locations across the country where there are dangerous toxins
produced or handled in factories and other places, officials are
loathe to declare their communities, or even a part of them, a danger
to anyone, for obvious reasons and, especially economic reasons.
There are all of the agencies that are supposed to protect the health
and safety of people, but, unless they are called in to investigate,
they usually assume that things are fine.
These
agencies, like local and state health departments, the state
environmental conservation departments, the EPA, and the older and
bigger agencies like the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the U.S.
Department of the Interior all have some responsibility to help
maintain the quality of drinking water for hundreds of millions of
citizens. When they fall down on the job or when they are not even
called in until there is a crisis, large numbers of people are at
risk and harm is done to individuals, families, and whole
communities.
So it
has happened in Flint and Hoosick Falls, but they are not alone, not
by far. Since the surge of environmental awareness over the past
half-century, it has become clear that the problems are widespread
and it has become equally clear that agencies of government can only
do so much. As in both of these communities, it was the people who
caused government agencies to investigate and take action. Over the
past decades, it has been non-profit environmental organizations that
have taken the lead in identifying hazardous places and dangerous
threats to water, air, and soil. These have been the spur to action
by government, usually only after years of activity by individuals
and groups, most of which have little or no money.
The
environmental work of individuals and groups has been fought tooth
and nail by politicians on the right, as dangers to the economic
health of the community or nation. One only has to look at the
vicious fight in favor of horizontal hydro fracturing for gas and oil
by many politicians, or their opposition to the Clean Water Act. The
resistance to taking any action to mitigate climate change by
Republicans in Congress and lots of others (including some Democrats)
stems from their stated opposition to anything that will harm “the
American way of life,” which is based largely on consumerism. They
will not tolerate any threat to the malls of America or their online
counterparts.
Only
when their own families are threatened with bodily harm will many of
those politicians take any action, but that doesn’t happen often,
because their homes and communities are far removed from the toxic
dangers. That usually happened on “the other side of the tracks,”
where the community’s industrial operations and pollution were the
rule, starting with the railroads, themselves.
“The
other side of the tracks” is a concept that we should be
remembering now, because things have not changed that much. Those
who live on the “other side of the tracks” are black, brown,
immigrant, and the poor and it has been ever thus. Let’s not
forget the Indian reservations. That’s where they put the trains,
it’s where they put the dumps, it’s where they store toxic waste
(or try to), and it’s where the chemical plants and oil refineries
are located. How about the water in those places?
There
is only one way to find out: Test the water in all of those places in
the U.S. and make the resulting information easily available on line.
Start with every community that has a municipal water system. In
all areas, including the rural areas, do random testing of private
wells, especially where there is a history of industrial activity.
And, start in the poorest neighborhoods, using the latest census to
find those places.
But,
you say, that’s already done all across the country. And that is
the point: In both Flint and Hoosick Falls, testing was done and
officials assured the people who were drinking that water that
everything was fine…until it wasn’t fine. The quality of water
should be something that is reported widely, just as the weather is
reported by every newspaper and television station, no matter how
small. Congress should act on such an important issue. Elected
officials and politicians are not drinking bad water and they should
be forced to see that none of the people drink bad water.
|