This is a reprint of a recent interview
conducted by Pambazuka
News with Congolese leader Ernest Wamba-dia-Wamba
Introduction by --Bill Fletcher, Jr., BlackCommentator.com
Executive Editor
Wamba, as he is generally known, is a is a leading
Marxist thinker and activist who spent many years in exile in the
USA during the reign of the notorious Mobutu Sese Seku. Wamba returned
to Africa in the early 1980s where he taught at the University of
Dar Es Salaam in Tanzania. He remained active among Zairian/Congolese
exiles, and was imprisoned when he returned to Zaire (now the Democratic
Republic of the Congo) to bring needed medicine to his father. As
a result of a successful and broad-based international campaign,
Wamba was released and returned to Tanzania.
In the mid 1990s, Wamba was part of the insurgency
that resulted in the ousting of Mobutu. This insurgency represented
a combination of indigenous Zairian/Congolese forces along with
allies from Rwanda and Uganda. Rwanda was particularly concerned
about the presence in the eastern Congo of Hutu militias and former
government troops that had been involved in the 1994 anti-Tutsi
genocide. The combination of the indigenous forces and their allies
swept aside Mobutu's forces and succeeded in gaining power. Laurent
Kabila, a long-time Mobutu opponent, was installed in office as
a result of the military victory.
Kabila soon proved to be a problem for both the Rwandans
and Ugandans, on the one hand, and a segment of the revolutionary
forces that overthrew Mobutu. A new insurgency/invasion took place
with the objective of both finally eliminating the Hutu *genocidaires*
as well as replacing Kabila.
For Wamba the objective was introducing a genuinely
democratic government in The DRC and uniting the country. As it
turned out, these were not necessarily the objectives of the Rwandans
and Ugandans.
Quickly this second insurgency/invasion ran into
problems. Angola and Zimbabwe sent troops to assist Kabila. The
thrust from the east stalled, and the DRC became engulfed in what
came to be known as Africa's first "world war."
Wamba's objective, all along, was to establish a
genuinely democratic government in the DRC and bring about national
unification and development.
In the course of the second insurgency/invasion,
he came to the conclusion
that the struggle had come to be dominated by militarist elements
even among some of his former comrades. As a result, he had a falling
out with other rebels particularly when he decided that the organization
that he led would demobilize its military component. As he noted
at the time, rather than the political movement directing the gun,
the gun was directing the political movement. Wamba's courageous
actions resulted in numerous threats on his life.
Wamba has remained quite active in the struggle over
the future of the DRC.
He has had his job cut out for him. Despite a peace
agreement and a national election, the DRC has not lived up to the
promise of democracy and self-determined development. One of the
richest countries on the planet—natural resources wise—has
been repeatedly raped and kept subject to outside forces, including
but not limited to multi-national corporations.
BC reprints this interview and is
very thankful that Pambazuka conducted it in the first place. We
reprint it because of the dire situation in the eastern Congo that
has recently flared up with an uprising by a former DRC military
leader known as Laurent Nkunda. Wamba explains the context of this
most recent crisis that has now been expanded with the reported
reintroduction of Angolan troops fighting along side of the forces
of the DRC national government.
--Bill Fletcher, Jr., BlackCommentator Executive
Editor
-0-
August
saw a fresh outbreak of conflict in the DRC. Since then, approximately
250,000 have been displaced in the eastern part of the country.
Following a brief cease-fire declared by the forces under the command
of General Laurent Nkunda, fighting again erupted on the 4th of
November. Ever since the 1994 Rwanda Genocide, and the subsequent
wars that raged between 1996 and 2002, the country has hardly seen
a moment's respite. The Kivu region has been the epicentre of the
latest round of fighting. In an interview with Firoze Manji, Ernest
Wamba Dia Wamba outlines the conditions necessary for a lasting
peace in the DRC.
Pambazuka
News: After many years of silence about the killings in
the DRC, the world's attention has suddenly turned to the current
sweeping of Laurent Nkunda's forces around Goma. What's brought
about this kind of attention?
Wamba
dia Wamba: I think that the change of the balance of forces
on the terrain is part of the reason. The scope of the humanitarian
catastrophe forces many western people connected with media, with
humanitarian organisations and also the rising interest in the situation
of the DRC around the US elections. One hears that the incumbent
regime would like to create hot situations either to help the Republican
candidate or to create faits accomplis for the new regime to deal
with. Around certain universities in the US, for example, for the
first time a trend has developed to take up the issue of the silence
on killings in the DRC. And, we have to add also the need for Western
capitalists, after the Chinese contract with the DRC government,
to re-assume their control over the Congolese resources. We hear
that the idea of a Kosovo is being played, but, if it materialises
it will be not for Congolese peoples’ interest but to have
control over very important mineral and agriculture potential resources
of the area.
Pambazuka
News: The mass media in the West predictably seeks to portray
the conflict as tribal. But what is this conflict about? What are
the political and economic factors behind the conflict?
Wamba
dia Wamba: Tribal differences have never been a cause of
conflict; other conditions must prevail to transform differences
into discriminations and these to lead to conflicts. There are of
course many unresolved issues since the Rwandese genocide took place
and many, including genocidaires, moved massively to the DRC as
recommended by the international community. Nkunda, for example
does use the presence of the FDLR [Forces Démocratiques de
Liberation du Rwanda], still committed to retake power in Rwanda
and perhaps carry out genocide, as one reason for his war. The truth
of the matter is that we have to distinguish between the main objective,
access and control over the resources, and the conditions facilitating
that objective, the existence of genocidaires creating havoc on
innocent people, the sentiments of exclusion still felt by the Tutsi
Congolese, the involvement of the DRC government with those genocidaires
– used as the government's marines, according to some –
and the possible alliances between business people aligned with
government officials of states in the region. Most of our regional
governments are actually led by security officers allied to businessmen.
It is said that Rwandese businessmen, among others, have been financing
Nkunda to keep control of the mines and continue exploit minerals
– coltan, niobium, etc – very much sought by transnational
enterprises producing or distributing mobile phones, satellites,
etc.
The
subsoil of the whole of the DRC has almost been sold out with contracts
to so-called partners. Quite a few family members of people in power,
from the summit on, find themselves on those contracts. One suspects
that in zones where there is no firm control by any state, weapons
decide everything. In a sense, Kivu is now the weakest link of the
globalisation’s chain. We need to identify the different contradictions
converging there. The absence of a real state authority, apparently
willed by some who are in the State, facilitates the agents of the
world economy of crime.
Pambazuka
News: What are the roles of Rwanda, Uganda, Zimbabwe and
Angola in this conflict? What's in it for them?
Wamba
dia Wamba: After having experienced the destabilisation
of a Mobutist gendarme state, many neighbouring countries would
rather prefer having a weak Congo around, especially if they can
even benefit from that weakness by engaging also in the looting
of resources of the Congo. The invisible alliances in business facilitate
that kind of pursuit. Certain officials in Uganda and in Kinshasa
at some point did have joint business going on. Rwanda has an interest
it uses contradictorily: the presence of the genocidaires to claim
that its security is threatened and to keep a situation of anarchy
to have access to resources on which its businessmen have been enriching
themselves. Their participation in the last two rebellions made
them taste the resources available in Congo and in fact want to
continue enjoying them in one way or another. The task of organised
government in Kinshasa would have been to find ways of legalising
participation in the common exploitation of resources. This process
has been very slow and one feels that the anarchy is found more
profitable in the short run.
Pambazuka
News: The European Union and other countries are deeply
engaged in exploitation of the DRC's resources. To what extent are
they culpable in the current crisis?
Wamba
dia Wamba: Certain transnational enterprises were identified
by the UN panel some time back: Anglo-America, Standard Chartered
Bank, De Beers, etc. The nature of the minerals being exploited
in the area can only be used by advanced enterprises and Africans
are just intermediaries. The campaign against the DRC-China contract
by the West is an indication of their willingness to control the
Congo resources. The sad part is that profitability through bloody
coltan being higher, they do not really care about the life of the
innocent Congolese, only to reduce the miseries through so-called
humanitarian punctual aid and not to eradicate violence altogether.
Pambazuka
News: Are we witnessing the 'Balkanisation' of the DRC?
Wamba
dia Wamba: The rebels are occupying an area of about 3
territories. It is not clear whether in negotiations they will accept
to give it up. If the DRC government does not succeed in getting
that territory back and if external forces support the keeping of
the territory by the rebels, a small but very rich country will
be formed and the impact on the rest of the country may lead to
a real balkanisation. The government is being asked not to give
up to that demand if formulated. Congolese people are firm for their
territorial integrity.
Pambazuka
News: Does the Kinshasa government have any control of
the situation?
Wamba
dia Wamba: Not really, that is why it has being criticising
the MONUC for its own failure to arrest the war. Because of the
nature of leadership we have, mostly interested in looting resources
and staying in power, condoning impunity, etc.; institutions hardly
function. Most of what it promised to do is not being done, including
national reconciliation and building of a real national army. Even
the new government being sworn in does not seem to inspire confidence
in the population. Many useless dead-woods have been but behaving
as if the republic is their private propriety – the so-called
the parallel government have been re-included.
Pambazuka
News: What should be the response of pan-Africans to the
present situation?
Wamba
dia Wamba: Call for a regional African Peoples’ conference,
if there is a way to make this happen. What is needed even for democracy
to be built in the area is that people agitate to really build a
post-neoliberalist developmentalist State. In the short run, we
should agitate against any possible Balkanisation, for the application
of the Nairobi agreements, for the exchange of embassies between
the DRC and its neighbours, Rwanda and Uganda, and for an urgent
humanitarian intervention.
*
Professor Ernest Wamba dia Wamba is honorary senator and vice-president
of the Organizing Power of the Kongo University.
* Firoze Manji is editor in chief of Pambazuka News and director
of Fahamu – Networks for social justice.
* Please send comments to [email protected]
or comment online at www.pambazuka.org/ |