Ward Connerly, that high profile opponent for
affirmative action and Black water carrier for the new Jim
Crow, has returned. He wants to eliminate affirmative action
everywhere, and make a buck at the same time. And with the
help of corporate philanthropy and hate groups, he wants to
take us back to the future we know too well.
Connerly
is plotting and planning for what he calls a Super Tuesday
for Equal Rights. The purpose of his campaign is to promote
ballot initiatives throughout the country that would eliminate
tax dollars to affirmative action programs based on race and
gender. Following similar initiatives in California,
Michigan and Washington, he has targeted five states
for this year’s November ballot - Arizona,
Colorado, Missouri,
Nebraska and Oklahoma. Targeting states with relatively low numbers of people of
color - and undoubtedly relying on the longstanding effectiveness
of racial scapegoating, particularly in hard economic times,
Connerly might very well succeed in the absence of a determined
and coordinated campaign to quash his efforts.
Although the anti-affirmative action forces
seek to eliminate public funding of diversity based on gender
as well as race, thereby harming White women as well, it is
the so-called “racial preferences” that stick in the minds
of people. Part of the time-tested Southern Strategy, anti-diversity
campaigns is to appeal to disaffected Whites, who will act
against their own interests, if it means the elimination of
programs they believe are unfairly benefiting Black and Brown
folks.
Destroying the King Legacy is Profitable
So, what’s in it for Connerly? The dollars,
of course. Apparently, there is much money to be made in dismantling
the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the civil rights
movement, and Connerly is first in line to get paid.
In 1993, he was given a platform by California
Gov. Pete Wilson with a seat on the California Board of Regents.
Soon, he became a crusader against all that is important to
Black people. That crusade was made possible through the support
of extreme right-wing corporate philanthropy and alliances
with White supremacist hate groups. Certainly, behind every
puppet there is a puppet master who controls the strings,
and Ward Connerly is no exception.
In
1996, Connerly, himself a beneficiary of affirmative action
through a California set-aside program for minority contractors, was responsible
for the passage of Proposition 209, which eliminated the use
of affirmative action by the state government in hiring and
university admissions. On the eve of Dr. King’s birthday in
1997, thanks to the generosity of the ultra-conservative Lynde
and Harry Bradley Foundation and others, he formed the American
Civil Rights Institute (ACRI). (The Bradley Foundation
has funded organizations that seek to destroy civil rights,
such as the Center for Individual Rights. Charles Murray,
author of the infamous book The Bell Curve, is a Bradley
fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.) That same year,
Connerly also formed the American
Civil Rights Coalition (ACRC), the lobbying arm of ACRI.
In true Orwellian fashion, these organizations embrace the
antithesis of what their names suggest.
The Equal Justice Society reports that in 2003,
based on IRS records, Connerly received $1 million in compensation
for his anti-civil rights efforts at ACRI and ACRC. This does
not include compensation he received as CEO of Connerly &
Associates, his Sacramento-based real estate business.
The group Media
Transparency has detailed the bankrolling of Ward Connerly’s
segregationist operations by the Bradley, Olin and Scaife
Foundations. When he was unwilling to disclose the funding
sources of his failed Proposition 54 - which would have prevented
California from collecting important racial data,
thereby crippling any efforts to address racial disparities
in healthcare and education - a coalition of civil rights
organizations sued him. Connerly, who raised $1.6
million for the 2003 Prop 54 effort, was fined $95,000
for breaking campaign financing disclosure laws. According
to the Equal Justice Society, some of his largest contributors
included John Moores, Sr., University of California Regents
board member and owner of the San Diego Padres ($400,000);
Rupert Murdoch, owner of Fox News ($300,000); Joseph Coors,
the late Colorado beer baron and founding partner of the Heritage
Foundation ($250,000), and William J. Hume, head of the anti-labor
San Francisco-based company Basic American Foods ($200,000).
White Supremacist Support for Anti-Affirmative Action
Efforts
If people are judged by the company they keep,
then history will not show kindness to Connerly and the foes
of civil rights. In his successful campaign to eliminate affirmative
action in Michigan, he allied himself
with Rev. John Raternik, head of the Michigan
chapter of the Council of Conservative Citizens (CCC).
The CCC, a White supremacist organization,
descended from the White Citizens’ Councils of the Jim Crow
era and is listed as a hate group by the Southern
Poverty Law Center. The CCC, which has made the issue
of non-White immigration a top priority, has declared America “a European country,” opposes “all efforts
to mix the races” and refers to Black people as “a retrograde
species of humanity.” Well-known figures with ties to the
CCC include Presidential candidate Mike Huckabee (R-AR), ex-Senator
Trent Lott (R-MI), Governor Haley Barbor (R-MI), the late
Senator Jesse Helms of North Carolina, former Mississippi
Governor Kirk Fordice, and former Alabama Governor Guy Hunt.
Connerly, who supports segregation, welcomed
the support of White racist groups in his fight against affirmative
action. “If the Ku Klux Klan thinks that equality is right,
God bless them,” said Connerly. “Thank them for finally reaching
the point where logic and reason are being applied, instead
of hate.”
Dishonoring the movement
Conservatives will point to individuals such
as Clarence Thomas, Ward Connerly and others who are viewed
as “brave” and “courageous” for bucking the Black establishment
and taking unpopular views. But there is no bravery in what
Connerly does, which is to cynically misappropriate Dr. King’s
vision for a colorblind society, in order to strike a blow
against the nation’s civil rights protections.
There
is no honor in desecrating the graves of the truly courageous
martyrs, those such as Viola Liuzzo, a mother of five from
Detroit who was gunned down like a dog
by the KKK in Alabama
in 1965, all for fighting for civil rights. There is no honor
in spitting on the memory of voting rights crusader Fannie
Lou Hamer, who was jailed and beaten nearly to death by police
in Mississippi,
and never recovered from her wounds. Nor is there any glory
in dishonoring and mocking the name of Vernon Dahmer, who
was killed in a terrorist bombing, not in Iraq
or Afghanistan, but in his home in Hattiesbug, Mississippi, after
volunteering to pay for Black voters’ poll taxes.
A Return to Jim Crow
Years later, what we are witnessing is a concerted
effort to bring the country back to the old times, at a time
when the nation is becoming increasingly diverse, increasingly
Black and Brown. In the absence of mandated diversity programs,
the country will revert to de facto segregation.
Some people yearn for the days of exclusion
and privilege, when universities maintained a quota of zero
for Blacks, a rigid quota for nonwhites, Jews and others,
and a place for women - in the home.
The sentiment against diversity is best characterized
by President A. Lawrence Lowell of Harvard, who, in not allowing
a Black student to live in the freshman dorms in 1922, told
him, “I am sure you will understand why, from the beginning,
we have not thought it possible to compel men of different
races to reside together.” Lowell, in enforcing a 15 percent quota for Jewish
students, stated that “anti-Semitic feeling among the students
is increasing, and it grows in proportion to the increase
in the number of Jews... when... the number of Jews was small,
the race antagonism was small also.” In his racist view, “The
summer hotel that is ruined by admitting Jews meets its fate…because
they drive away the Gentiles, and then after the Gentiles
have left, they leave also.”
Lowell’s ideological heirs are found in the form
of Ward Connerly and the members of today’s neo-segregationist
movement. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, perhaps the
most prominent jockey of that movement, recently voted with
the court’s majority to outlaw voluntary integration plans
in the public schools. In a concurring opinion, Thomas seemed
to channel Lowell when he said that “Simply putting students
together under the same roof does not necessarily mean that
the students will learn together or even interact. Furthermore,
it is unclear whether increased interracial contact improves
racial attitudes and relations… Some studies have even found
that a deterioration in racial attitudes seems to result from
racial mixing in schools.”
Voices of the new segregation, like the old
voices of Jim Crow, are having a chilling effect on democratic
tendencies in America.
It is no accident that, according to Columbia
University and the Society of American
Law Teachers, enrollment for African-American and Mexican-American
students in law schools has continuously declined over the
past 15 years, despite high scores and grades from applicants
of color. And while the legal profession is disproportionately
White, the prisons are disproportionately Black and Latino.
What can we do to stop this trend?
One group, The Coalition to Defend Affirmative
Action, Integration & Immigrant Rights, and Fight for
Equality By Any Means Necessary, or BAMN,
is a leader in the struggle to save civil rights and diversity
programs in higher education. But groups such as BAMN cannot
do it alone. People of goodwill must join together in creating
a country that embraces diversity. The alternative is to allow
a victory for Ward Connerly, Fox News, the Heritage Foundation
and the Klan.
BlackCommentator.com
Editorial
Board member David A. Love, JD is a lawyer and prisoners’
rights advocate based in Philadelphia, and a contributor
to the Progressive Media Project, McClatchy-Tribune News Service,
In These Times and Philadelphia Independent
Media Center. He contributed to the book, States of Confinement: Policing, Detention, and Prisons
(St. Martin's Press, 2000). Love is a former Amnesty International
UK spokesperson,
organized the first national police brutality conference as
a staff member with the Center for Constitutional Rights,
and served as a law clerk to two Black federal judges. His
blog is davidalove.com. Click
here to contact Mr. Love.