The independence of black American leadership is under
assault
by a tsunami of cash. Unprecedented levels of corporate underwriting
are subverting
black civic organizations. Tens of millions in faith-based federal
grants have been deployed to suborn
black clergy. Rivers of charitable and campaign contributions have
been invested in subduing or silencing the voices of African America
elected officials. Predictably, the onslaught is taking its toll.
Last week the House of Representatives passed the
COPE Act, which will turn the free and open Information Superhighway
into a corporate toll road, and lift regulations that force cable
and telephone companies to serve poor and minority areas. Only
46% of Democrats in the House of Representatives voted against it.
But in a stunning repudiation of its own historic claims to be the
“conscience of the congress” and the authentic voice of African
America in national affairs, a mere 13 out of 40 voting CBC members
in the House summoned the courage to buck the tide of corporate
cash and stand up for their constituents. (The two delegates from
Washington, DC and the U.S. Virgin Islands cannot vote on the House
floor.) Two-thirds of the Caucus capitulated to corporate power,
a more shameful showing than Democratic members as a whole. As
“conscience of the congress,” the Congressional Black Caucus is
pretty much over.
To comprehend the depths of this betrayal we must
understand that there are absolutely no economic development cases
which can be made with a straight face for turning the free Internet
into a corporate toll road, or for allowing cable and phone companies
to deny premium broadband service to all but the wealthiest customers.
The dirty little secret the telecommunications companies
will never tell us is that despite the incessant prattle about being
the most technologically advanced nation on the planet, the US ranks
16th, according to the International Telecommunications Union, in
the percentage of its citizens provided with some form of broadband
Internet access. When we can get that access at all, broadband
Internet in the US is the slowest and most expensive in the developed
world, well behind
Japan, South Korea, and all of Western Europe. Bruce Kushnick of
www.teletruth.org offers this useful comparison between proposed
broadband services in the US and those in South Korea and Japan.
The top broadband speed available to home and business
consumers in the US is only 1.5 megabits per second, and most customers
pay about $30 per month for that. In France customers get 25 megabits
per second for less than a third the price. Singapore is about
to offer its citizens 1000 megabits per second. American telcos,
on the other hand, say they cannot give us more than 6 megabits
per second without the end of network neutrality as a financial
incentive.
The claims of cable and telecommunications monopolies
that deregulating them and handing the keys of the Internet over
to them will erase the digital divide inside the US, provide universal
access and keep us competitive with the rest of the world, are simply
lies. US consumers have already paid AT&T, Comcast, Verizon,
BellSouth, Qwest and the rest of their telecom and cable cousins
hundreds of billions in corporate tax breaks and excess fees – the
highest phone, cable and Internet charges in the world – to provide
universal high-speed access which we have never received.
Other provisions of the COPE Act favored by 27 out
of 40 members of the Congressional Black Caucus which allow cable
companies to deny service to entire demographic areas are indefensible
on their face, given the sorry track record of these same outfits
over the years. The votes of CBC members went the way they did
because of the generous campaign and charitable contributions of
telecommunications companies. “I’ve been here more than ten years,"
said one CBC member, “and I have never seen a full court press like
this.”
These are the 13 voting members of the Congressional
Black Caucus in the House who should he applauded for upholding
its tradition, the interests of African American communities, and
the interests of the whole American public.
Barbara Lee -- CA
Diane E. Watson -- CA
Maxine Waters -- CA
Juanita Millender-McDonald -- CA
Cynthia McKinney -- GA
John Lewis -- GA
Carolyn Kilpatrick -- MI
John Conyers, Jr. -- MI
Emanuel Cleaver, II -- MO
Donald M. Payne -- NJ
Chaka Fattah -- PA
Robert Scott -- VA
Gwen Moore -- WI
And these are the twenty-seven who caved to corporate
cash, voting to end the Internet as we know it. They voted to allow
phone and Internet companies to raise long distance charges, and
to exempt cable companies from the oversight of local governments
who might prohibit discrimination against their constituents.
Artur Davis -- AL
Corrine Brown -- FL
Kendrick B. Meek -- FL
Alcee L. Hastings -- FL
Sanford Bishop, Jr. -- GA
David Scott -- GA
Bobby L. Rush -- IL
Jesse Jackson, Jr. -- IL
Danny Davis -- IL
Julia Carson -- IN
William J. Jefferson -- LA
Albert Wynn -- MD
Elijah E. Cummings -- MD
William Lacy Clay, Jr. -- MO
Bennie G. Thompson -- MS
G. K. Butterfield, Jr. -- NC
Melvin L. Watt -- NC
Gregory W. Meeks -- NY
Edolphus Towns -- NY
Major R. Owens -- NY
Charles B. Rangel -- NY
Stephanie T. Jones -- OH
James E. Clyburn -- SC
Harold E. Ford, Jr. -- TN
Al Green -- TX
Sheila Jackson-Lee -- TX
Eddie Bernice Johnson -- TX
It’s Later Than You Think
From a legal and regulatory standpoint the free and
open Internet as we know it has been on borrowed time for many months.
A 6 to 3 Supreme court decision
led by Clarence Thomas back in June of 2005 split an imaginary legal
hair to exempt cable companies from the “common carrier” rule that
compels the owners of phone networks to route traffic from outside
their own networks on a non-discriminatory basis. That was the
first regulatory nail in the coffin of network neutrality. Phone
companies, who provide most of the broadband Internet to homes and
businesses in the US immediately appealed for the FCC to extend
the ruling to them, and they did, with a 12 month moratorium before
the new ruling takes effect. So even if the Senate version of the
COPE Act dies, and the congress does nothing this year, telecommunications
monopolies will be free to end network neutrality beginning some
time in August.
The COPE Act and its Senate version merely makes the
existing situation even worse, by explicitly forbidding the FCC
from enforcing anything resembling network neutrality. But even
without it, the telecommunications companies have already bought
the court decisions and regulations they want.
Without network neutrality, those of us who enjoy
cheap long distance phone calling over the Internet will see our
Internet providers block or ban services other than theirs, and
raise the prices. Many of us who imagine we don’t even use the
Internet, but who depend on long distance calling cards to stay
in touch with relatives or friends will find those services more
expensive or unavailable. And those who download music, who read
foreign newspapers, who share pictures and news and opinions are
about to experience a new Internet regime. It’s not too late to
fight it, or to roll it back, but it is coming. It’s later than
we think.
The free and open Internet is almost over. And as
far as representing the interests and aspirations of black America,
so is the Congressional Black Caucus.
We recommend you visit SaveAccess.org
for the complete list of Democrats who voted for and against the
COPE Act. If your congressperson voted against it, it’s time to
call and congratulate him or her. If he or she voted for it, and
most did, call and express your profound disappointment.
It’s time for citizens, consumers and communities
in the US to fight for the kind of universal broadband access people
in Western Europe and Japan enjoy. Cheap and ubiquitous broadband
access is as vital to economic development of our communities as
are well-paved roads and streets. And if corporate cash can flip
a majority of its members on such a key issue, it may also be time
for African Americans to take a long look at the usefulness of the
Congressional Black Caucus. |