
        Lying 
          by the numbers
         Associate Editor Bruce Dixon's dismantling of the 
          Atlanta Journal-Constitution's contrived "study" of the Denise 
          Majette - Cynthia McKinney primary election resonated among our readership. 
          "Denise Majette's claims to substantial African American support 
          in the August election, as well as the political conclusions offered 
          by the newspaper and the many media outlets that have cited its reports, 
          are based on phantom voters, wishful thinking and phony numbers - lies 
          made of whole cloth," Dixon wrote. Neither was there "evidence 
          in 'predominantly black precincts' of sufficient black Majette voters 
          to indicate a new, rightward trend in DeKalb County, Georgia - much 
          less to extrapolate for the rest of black America." (See "The 
          Atlanta Journal-Constitution's Bogus Election 'Study,'" Nov. 
          4 issue.)
 
           Associate Editor Bruce Dixon's dismantling of the 
          Atlanta Journal-Constitution's contrived "study" of the Denise 
          Majette - Cynthia McKinney primary election resonated among our readership. 
          "Denise Majette's claims to substantial African American support 
          in the August election, as well as the political conclusions offered 
          by the newspaper and the many media outlets that have cited its reports, 
          are based on phantom voters, wishful thinking and phony numbers - lies 
          made of whole cloth," Dixon wrote. Neither was there "evidence 
          in 'predominantly black precincts' of sufficient black Majette voters 
          to indicate a new, rightward trend in DeKalb County, Georgia - much 
          less to extrapolate for the rest of black America." (See "The 
          Atlanta Journal-Constitution's Bogus Election 'Study,'" Nov. 
          4 issue.)
        
        Darryl 
          Cox is a strategic planner and knows something about numbers. Cox applauds 
          our analysis, but questions the tone of the article. He also believes 
          Cynthia McKinney shares some of the responsibility for her own defeat. 
          
         
          Bravo!! 
            Your study is a sorely needed antidote to the superficial and misinformed 
            analyses we have been presented with to date regarding the electoral 
            contest between Rep. Cynthia McKinney and Denise Majette. I would 
            like to offer two criticisms or comments about your report, although 
            neither of them refutes your thesis about the election. One, Rep. 
            McKinney's shares a portion of the blame for her vilification at least 
            with regard to her comments about whether President Bush had prior 
            knowledge of the attacks on September 11. Surely, she should have 
            had enough political sense and common, garden-variety mother wit to 
            know that making comments of this type would energize her political 
            opponents and move many of them not to vote for the eventual Republican 
            primary winner but, rather, for her major Democratic primary opponent. 
            If Rep. McKinney did not foresee the consequences of her statements 
            about the president then she was guilty either of hubris or gross 
            naiveté or both. She and her supporters simply cannot claim 
            to be victims as though they had little or no role, in provoking their 
            attackers.
          My 
            final comment pertains to your suggesting that Denise Majette be shunned 
            and "shamed at every opportunity." I understand the righteous 
            anger you feel toward her and all that she represents. Black people 
            have always had to deal with the proverbial "Trojan Horse" 
            in our midst. What concerns me, however, is that I believe that you 
            undercut and diminish the power of your analysis by publicly expressing 
            this degree of animosity toward Majette. Your study, in my opinion, 
            effectively undercuts her claims of having attained a certain degree 
            of legitimacy within the black community. Suggesting or demanding 
            that she be shunned makes it appear that you only have an axe to grind 
            and that your real aim is not to bring about clarity and truth but 
            to skewer your political enemies.
        
        Bruce 
          Dixon Replies:
         
          Thank 
            you for your thoughtful comments. The new representative from Georgia's 
            4th district was elected despite a four to one black vote against 
            her in the primary, and like many Democrats, she expected and got 
            virtually all the black vote cast in November. For the next two years, 
            the only powers people of color will have over Denise Majette are 
            those of public shame and opprobrium. To suggest the exercise of these 
            purely social sanctions somehow "undercuts" the position 
            that she is an enemy artifact planted in a position of ostensible 
            leadership among us, a Trojan Horse, is just a little strange. 
          Denise 
            Majette benefited from a campaign of unmatched nastiness. Her supporters 
            publicly questioned McKinney's motives, patriotism, character and 
            more. Majette is nowhere on record cautioning them about their lack 
            of civility. She even joined in, claiming that McKinney was funded 
            by people "linked to" terrorism. Majette and her supporters 
            were simply enforcing the consensus of corporate America, in which 
            anyone questioning the "war on terrorism" is fair game for 
            slander and vituperation.
          Similarly, 
            in recent days the enforcers of the Corporate Consensus have tried 
            to convince us that use of the labels "house slave", "Uncle 
            Tom" and "Darth Vader in the body of a black woman" 
            as applied to its ex-generals, supreme court justices and national 
            security advisors are vile racist epithets sufficient to require the 
            denouncing and dismissal of any who utter them as beyond the pale. 
            
          Let's 
            not be fooled. We have the right to access our own collective experience, 
            our own American history to express shared feelings about the behaviors 
            of public officials who do what they do with our money and in our 
            name. There is no reason to pretend that Majette's pose as some new 
            kind of black leader is legit. Clarence Thomas would not feel comfortable 
            in a room with a lot of African Americans, and for good reason. Neither 
            should Denise Majette.
        
        An 
          important part of our publication's reason for existence is to reveal 
          the lies at the heart of corporate media-spun myths. We appreciate these 
          words of encouragement from reader, Al Kamara.
          
         
          Great 
            piece of research. If possible let us have the truth of the numbers 
            behind the Republican wins in the recent elections. We have the intuitive 
            belief that the Republican Party has become the refuge of most whites 
            since 1965 in their attempts to maintain racial privileges legally 
            lost with desegregation legislation. In other words, the big question 
            is what percentage of white voters voted Republican this time around? 
            And what percentage of the Democrat vote was white? 
          Gender 
            breakdowns will also be revealing. We suspect Bush's wins have nothing 
            to do with him at all but rather everything to do with the perception 
            that his party will do everything to "protect" white interests 
            even to the point of cutting off noses to spite faces. This would 
            mean that whites will overlook corporate scandals, bad economic policies, 
            tax cuts for the rich - at their won expense so long as white racial 
            interests are seen to be protected with racist, rightwing judges, 
            locking up more blacks, slaughtering Iraqis, etc. 
        
        Loretta 
          Renford is a tireless organizer and truth-disseminator. We're glad she's 
          on our side.
          
         
          I 
            am thoroughly amazed, yet proud that The Black Commentator, Bruce 
            Dixon and others continue to investigate and put together a solid 
            piece of indisputable facts that expose the slick entry of the Trojan 
            Horse in our midst.
          Again, 
            Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney deserves our continued support and 
            another apology as the charlatans once more move among us, sliding 
            into the honored seats in our weakening political arena. While most 
            of our eyes and ears were opened to observe, we heard the pre-acceptance 
            speech of the Congressional Black Caucus, accepting another Trojan 
            Horse into its midst. We demand that they take steps to eject this 
            charlatan based on her disgraceful entry as an elected representative 
            of Georgia's 4th district. Perhaps, if all the allegations are true, 
            maybe they are getting their just desserts. But, not all voters were 
            involved in this disgraceful plot to unseat Congresswoman McKinney.
          Now, 
            where do we go from here? Where and when will the outrage become such 
            an unbearable burning in our bellies? Will we ever stand for justice 
            and kick these Clarence Thomas-like gutless wonders in the butt and 
            make all of them accountable and respectful to our people? We need 
            politicians that choose not to prostitute themselves or the people 
            they represent. 
           and staff... Keep up the good work. I thank you on 
            behalf of all.
 
            and staff... Keep up the good work. I thank you on 
            behalf of all.
        
        We 
          at  firmly believe that, ultimately, the Black Trojan Horse 
          strategy will collapse under the scrutiny of a wise people. However, 
          there will be many defeats along the way. People like Ms. Renford keep 
          us strong and alert.
 
          firmly believe that, ultimately, the Black Trojan Horse 
          strategy will collapse under the scrutiny of a wise people. However, 
          there will be many defeats along the way. People like Ms. Renford keep 
          us strong and alert.
        Actin' 
          the fool
        CherylAnn 
          enjoyed our Briefs section in the October 17 issue, especially the rundown 
          on George Bush's mock-insanity. 
         
          Congratulations 
            on this wonderfully written article, describing our present state 
            of affairs so very succinctly. (Of course the article was written 
            before election-day depression set in.) 
          When 
            I reached the subtitle "Lethally Stupid" I was totally amazed 
            by the truths that are staring all of American's in the face yet they 
            seem to be mesmerized by this "regime"! I know that there 
            has been several references to Hitler and our present "chief 
            of stuff" but the influence isn't only the persuasiveness of 
            the so-called "down home" type charisma... no, this is a 
            far more nefarious "regime".
           
            "You're 
              not supposed to be so blind with patriotism that you can't face 
              reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it or who says it." 
              - Malcolm X
          
        
        Anyone 
          who quotes Malcolm cannot be too far wrong. 
        Wild 
          about Harry
        Mail 
          continues to arrive from readers of Harry Belafonte's Larry King Live 
          interview, reprinted here, in which the singer/activist dramatically 
          explained the difference between Colin Powell, the Role Model, and the 
          actual role he plays for the Bush Administration. 
        Reader 
          Russell offered these comments:
         
           I 
            was not surprised, but encouraged, by Mr. Belafonte's candid remarks. 
            He lets me relish in the idea that there are still men out there that 
            think for themselves and do not follow the rest of the cattle. This 
            perspective that we are all being spoon fed by the mega media does 
            nothing but promote piracy on a worldwide scale. This country, faults 
            and all, deserves a better role than that of thieves stealing the 
            resources of weaker countries around the world. It appears we will 
            ignore the "threats" of more powerful nations and only flex 
            our muscles when our opponents are obviously weaker. The problem with 
            the bully picking his battles to make himself appear strong is that 
            the size of the dog in the fight is not nearly as important as the 
            size of the fight in the dog. Thank you to Mr. Belafonte for letting 
            the world know the people of this country are not behind the policies 
            of our illegal leaders.
        
        We 
          call our readers' attention to the sad and silly statements by Rev. 
          Al Sharpton and Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) on Harry Belafonte's criticism 
          of Colin Powell, in the Briefs column of this issue.
        David 
          Oberweiser has greetings, observations and a prediction.
         
           Sisters 
            and Brothers: Wish I could send more than praise for the work you 
            have done. The Belafonte interview is a jewel and most commentary 
            on our corrupt racist politics is on the money. Stay the course in 
            these stormy seas. We may get the shit knocked out of us for now, 
            but once the people really unite, we shall prevail.
        
        That's 
          why we do what we do.
        Keep 
          writing.
        
         
          Your comments are welcome. Visit the 
Contact 
            Us page for E-mail or Feedback.