The
10th anniversary of the Million Man March also marks the 10th
anniversary
of a missed opportunity to dramatically reduce the number of
African Americans in prison. Bill Clinton, jokingly
referred to as the “first black president,” could have made the decisive difference
a decade ago by remedying one of the most notorious illustrations
of disparity in the criminal justice system – the singling out
of crack cocaine offenders for harsher punishment than powder
cocaine offenders.
This sentencing law treats
possession of just five grams of crack cocaine (the weight of
five packets
of sweet and low) the same as the trafficking of 500 grams of
powder cocaine (about the weight of a one pound bag of sugar). In
other words, one receives the same five year mandatory sentence
for 5 grams of crack as for 500 grams of powder. But because
powder cocaine can very easily be converted to crack, to punish
crack cocaine offenses at a quantity ratio 100 times greater
than its original powder form, is irrational.
Despite prevalent stereotypes, the
majority of documented crack users are white. The “war
on drugs,” however, has been primarily fought in inner-city black
communities. This law enforcement policy has caused a disproportional
number of low-level black drug abusers to be herded to prison
under the crack laws, serving unreasonably harsh sentences.
On October 16, 1995, not
coincidentally the day of the Million Man March, then President
Clinton eloquently
appealed for “fairness and equality” in a riveting address on
race relations on a college campus, in which he stressed the
need to “root out racism” from the criminal justice system.
Ironically, two days after
that speech, the justice and equality that a million black men
had marched
to the steps of the Capitol to demand, was deferred. Congress
voted against equalizing the quantities for the sentencing of
crack and powder cocaine offenses.
This vote was suspect because
lawmakers rejected the wisdom of their own bipartisan Sentencing
Commission,
which had meticulously researched and analyzed cocaine and federal
sentencing policy over a two-year period. The Commission
had come to the unanimous conclusion that the sentences for crack
cocaine were too great and must be changed. Shamefully,
out of over 500 recommendations submitted by the expert Commission
since its inception, this was the first one Congress chose to
ignore.
The ball was then in Mr.
Clinton’s court. Congressional
Black Caucus members pointedly appealed to the president to eradicate
the disparity in cocaine sentencing. This was the first “test,” they
declared, in the wake of the Million Man March, to prove he would “root
out” unjust policies and practices. A coalition of civil
rights groups at that time declared that eliminating this unjust
law would have been “as easy as the stroke of a pen.” Unfortunately,
Mr. Clinton failed to turn his eloquently delivered words on race
relations into deeds, instead siding with the congressional majority
and disregarding rationally based reform. And prisons continued
to be built – and filled – throughout the 1990s.
Ten years have come and
gone. Nearly
a million black people are now in prison – largely because the
harsh crack cocaine laws have remained unchanged. Politics,
however, must not continue to drive sentencing policy. Now
is the time for progressives and conservatives to join together
to rectify the missed opportunity of the past. Congress
must listen to the advice of its own Sentencing Commission, which
concluded that revising this one law “would better reduce the
gap [in sentencing between African Americans and other racial
groups], and it would dramatically improve the fairness of the
federal sentencing system.”
During the past decade
the historic Million Man March has spawned several other national
marches,
including this past weekend’s Millions More Movement, pulling
together not just men, but women, youth, and families as well. But
the continuation of harsh and irrational sentencing laws is tearing
these very families apart. These laws have thrust unprecedented
numbers of women into the criminal justice system, subsequently
terminating parental rights to their children. They have
resulted in the warehousing of youth for prison terms at
the beginning of their adulthood, creating in the process an
epidemic of physical, mental, and public health issues. And
those who manage to return to communities at the conclusion of
decades-long sentences are confronted with staggering barriers
to successful reintegration into society, oftentimes causing
renewal of the same harmful cycles that put them in prison in
the first place.
It is time that crack cocaine
laws change. Policymakers
must have the courage to rationally reform them, and to directly
confront issues of racial disparity. Perhaps the Millions
More Movement can be the beginning of a grassroots catalyst that
encourages those on Capitol Hill and in the White House to mend
this “crack” in our justice system.
Nkechi Taifa, Esq., is a Senior Policy
Analyst with the Open Society Institute and an Adjunct Professor
at Howard University School of Law. |