In May of 2000 thousands of eligible voters in Florida
were removed from the rolls. Governor Jeb Bush and Secretary of
State Catherine Harris used Florida’s rules that bar felons
from voting to wrongly remove eligible voters. Black voters were
disproportionately affected and Al Gore lost that state and the
presidency because of this chicanery.
In 2004 Ohio Republicans used a simpler ruse to keep
blacks from getting anywhere near voting machines. They simply didn’t
send enough voting machines to polls in black precincts. Voting
machines were kept in storage on the day of a presidential election.
In Ohio and many other states provisional ballots went
uncounted. Electronic voting machines that lacked paper trails
produced dubious results.
There is no mystery about what ails the American voting
system. There is no guarantee that eligible voters will be able
to vote and voters have no guarantee that their votes will be counted.
Instead of addressing the obvious problems, politicians have instead
decided to create new problems and disenfranchise more people than
they have already. The Commission on Election Reform has given them
out that will do terrible harm.
Former president Jimmy Carter has spent the last twenty
years observing elections all over the globe. His role as the commission’s
co-Chair at first seemed logical, but James Baker’s participation
is utterly illogical and an insult to anyone who values the franchise.
Baker is the Bush family factotum who was instrumental
in stopping the Florida vote count in 2000. Congressman John Conyers
expressed his dismay
at Baker’s participation:
”Specifically, I am concerned about the inclusion
of Mr. James Baker, III as a Commission Member. For many of us,
Mr. Baker will be forever remembered for his ultimately successful
efforts to shut down the counting of votes in the 2000 Florida
election and I am concerned that his involvement in that election
may present a conflict with the goals and initiatives of your
The Commission’s report proves that Conyers
had every reason to be concerned. The commission addresses problems
that don’t even exist. Their worst recommendation would make
photo identification a requirement for voting. The commission rationale
for promoting such nonsense is insulting and bizarre.
Photo IDs currently are needed to board a plane, enter
federal buildings, and cash a check. Voting is equally important.
No, voting is not as important as check cashing or
traveling. It is more important. We don’t have the constitutional
right to board a plane and no one fought and died to get the right
to fly. It should be easier to enter a voting booth than it is to
enter an airport.
It is obvious that poor black people would be hardest
hit by this requirement. There are thousands of American citizens
eligible to vote who do not have identification and are unable to
get it. That is precisely why Republicans and co-opted Democrats
think it is such a good idea.
Andrew Young is among those corrupt Democrats in sheep’s
clothing. The vote thieves always say, “Andrew Young, who
marched with Dr. King, sees nothing wrong with identification requirements.”
himself from criticism by quoting Young. “It was very
encouraging to us that Andy Young, for instance, says this will
help minority voting instead of deterring it.”
It is difficult to see how that assertion could possibly
be true. Right now people can vote who don’t have identification.
If the Carter/Baker proposals become law, people who currently vote
without incident will suddenly have an obstacle in the polling place.
It is immaterial that Young marched with Dr. King.
In fact, his early history makes his support of disenfranchisement
all the more shocking. Young is not just being used to cover Carter’s
and Baker’s backsides, he is now praised
by the Wall Street Journal, proof of wrongdoing if it ever existed.
"I accept the recounts that show George Bush
won" – and says it's time for fresh thinking. "[Let's]
ask what we do about low voter turnout and whether it's the result
of racial discrimination or not," he told me. "I don't
think it is, since everyone is equally inconvenienced by how we
No, Rev. Mr. Young, everyone is not equally inconvenienced
by the way we vote. White Ohioans had enough voting machines in
their polling places and black Ohioans didn’t. White Floridians
did not have to fear being labeled felons when they went to the
polls, black Floridians did.
If Young’s history is being used to shut us
up, we must ask very critical questions about him. Why did Andrew
Young work with King in the first place? Was he a righteous man
who wanted to end injustice, or did he only want a seat at the table
Young came from a middle class family in New Orleans,
the son of a dentist and a teacher. He is an ordained minister with
degrees from Howard University and Hartford Theological Seminary.
Those accomplishments were of limited use to him in a segregated
The sky should have been the limit for him, but for
Young and every other black America, there was always a ceiling,
and it was set at a very low level. Andrew Young profited from the
civil rights movement and now allows himself to aid and abet people
who would undo its accomplishments. When Young’s association
with King is noted it must also be noted that he now makes a mockery
of that relationship.
A seal of approval from an opportunist shouldn’t
keep anyone from speaking out. Young’s allegiance is not with
black people and he shouldn’t be allowed to claim otherwise.
He is a turncoat and no one should be shy about saying so.
The ability of Andrew Young and his ilk to move into
circles of privilege may benefit them as individuals. If we think
we must pay them homage no matter what they do, it will be harmful
to all of us as a people.
Margaret Kimberley’s Freedom Rider column appears
weekly in BC. Ms. Kimberley is
a freelance writer living in New York City. She can be reached via
e-Mail at [email protected].
You can read more of Ms. Kimberley's writings at freedomrider.blogspot.com.