A Consumer Racial Profiling complaint filed in July,
2003, in the Western District of New York against J.C. Penney
by Nakiesha Jones, an African-American woman of Buffalo, New York,
alleges that JCPenney store security personnel Nicholas A. Goodwin
and Paul Meerboth, pursuant to JCPenney policy, engaged in racial
profiling and video surveillance of her for no reason but for
her race, resulting in her being falsely arrested and charged
with shoplifting.
Finding herself charged with the shoplifting of
two pair of pants, arrested and jailed, Ms. Jones retained Buffalo
criminal attorney Glenn E. Murray. The prosecutor, having
secured a copy of the store surveillance video tape, which conclusively
established Ms. Jones’ innocence, sought dismissal of all charges
in the interest of justice. Ms. Jones’ attorney objected
to the prosecutor’s request for dismissal and insisted that his
client, who was innocent, be allowed a trial by jury for an opportunity
to fully exonerate herself.
On July 16, 2002, in the Town of Amherst, Justice
William Waible granted the prosecutor’s request and dismissed
all charges in the interest of justice.
After criminal charges were dismissed, Ms. Jones
retained Buffalo attorney Richard Baumgarten, who filed the Consumer
Racial Profiling Civil Rights law suit.
The shocking video footage (which may be viewed
online)
shows the outright blatant disregard and disrespect by JCPenney
personnel toward the rights of minorities as these African-American
shoppers, for no apparent reason other than their race, were racially
profiled, followed and pursued throughout the JCPenney Department
store by video surveillance.
With regards to Ms. Jones, the video shows that
she picks out clothing she would eventually sample. Two pairs
of slacks are already in hand at the time the camera picks up
her image, she takes two more off the racks, goes to the women's
shirts, and eventually goes into the dressing room with the items
of clothing. Then Meerbooth and Goodwin focus the camera
outside the women’s dressing rooms. The camera fades to
black for about three minutes of elapsed store time. The cameraman
breaks his boredom by sweeping through other areas of the department
store, populated by Caucasian shoppers, focusing on none, and
then returns to the dressing room entrance to await Jones’ exit.
Jones eventually returns with the items of clothing and returns
them to 3 separate racks. Meerboth and Goodwin continue
video surveillance of Jones. Jones chats with a Caucasian
female, who appears to be a customer, eventually leaves the store
with no JCPenney items in her possession.
The complaint filed in federal court alleges that
after Ms. Jones left the JCPenney store she was followed and apprehended
by JCPenney security, subjected to an in-store search in a private
fitting room, which revealed that no stolen property was found
on her person, bags, or purse. Nevertheless, the two JCPenney
Loss Prevention Officers conspired together and charged Ms. Jones
with Petit Larceny, knowing full well the charge wasn't true.
Ms. Jones was arrested, jailed and released on bail some 3 hours
later, followed by months of prosecution.
Other lawsuits pending against JCPenney Department
stores alleging similar racial profiling practices were filed
by Paula Mayes, 45, who alleges that she was falsely accused of
shoplifting, slammed into a wall and pushed to the floor after
she exchanged a belt at a JCPenney store in Jacksonville, Fla.,
and by Claudie Pierre, of Queens, New York, who alleged in a complaint
filed in federal court that after leaving the store without making
a purchase, she was approached by JCPenney security guards on
the street, accused of shoplifting, and verbally and physically
abused. Although a search revealed no stolen merchandise,
she was not allowed to leave the detention area for nearly three
hours.
When asked about the effects of racial profiling
on profiling victims, Rogers Hicks, a paralegal, who assisted
with the criminal case, and is presently working with Mr. Baumgarten
on Ms. Jones' Civil Rights case, quoted from a Boston College
Third World Law Journal article, “Shopping
While Black: Applying 42 USC 1981 to Cases of Consumer Racial
Profiling”: