The first Black female U.S. Secretary of
State will inevitably preside over a general and dramatic decline
in American influence in the world, a process that accelerates with
each passing week. So bizarre is American behavior – so disconnected
from objective facts and from international conversation and evolving
human standards of conduct – that Condoleezza Rice cannot escape
becoming a caricature of diplomacy.
The Bush Pirates rolled their dice in Iraq
in the Spring of 2003 – and came up snake eyes. Even elements of
the U.S. corporate media see the handwriting on the historical wall:
utter defeat for the neo-con project in Iraq, and descent into terminal
isolation for the superpower. The war is all but lost, according
to a study released by Knight Ridder Newspapers on January
23:
”The United States is steadily
losing ground to the Iraqi insurgency, according to every key military
yardstick. …
”The analysis suggests that unless something dramatic changes – such
as a newfound will by Iraqis to reject the insurgency or a large
escalation of U.S. troop strength – the United States won't win
the war.”
The Americans never wanted to hold elections in Iraq, but ran out
of political wiggle room when Shi’ite Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani
last year threatened to bring a million of the faithful into the
streets of Baghdad and Basra. However, as the excellent Pepe Escobar,
of AsiaTimes, reported on January 27, this weekend’s “elections” are
possibly the most farcical held in human history. Bush “has introduced
to the world the concept of election at gunpoint”:
”Of 1 million eligible expatriate voters, only
10% will actually vote. There are no Sunni Arab candidates (in part
because the US military killed – or jailed – many Sunni party
and tribal leaders). For any Iraqi in Jordan, Syria, Iran, Saudi
Arabia or Turkey, it will be impossible to cross the border and vote:
borders will be closed for three days. Inside Iraq there will be
curfews - and even traffic will be blocked. Half of all candidates
have already withdrawn. And there will be no international monitors.
As the names of the roughly 7,700 candidates on 80 party coalition
lists are still unknown on the eve of polling day, no wonder the
word on Baghdad's streets is that ‘the Americans gave us the first
secret elections in history.’"
Elect, then eject U.S.
The Americans dare not deny the Shi’ites their victory. But, as
Escobar reported in December, and has been consistently misrepresented
by U.S. corporate media, the Ayatollah is no friend of the occupation:
”The United Iraqi Alliance – the Shi'ite, Grand
Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani-supervised electoral list (228 candidates) – has
a detailed, 23-point platform. According to its main negotiator,
Hussein Shahristani, the platform insists on the ‘sovereignty, unity
and Islamic identity’ of Iraq, and most crucially includes a plan
with a precise date for the end of the military occupation.”
Thus, the Americans have been painted into a corner. Bush insists
that U.S. forces will remain in Iraq “as long as it takes,” but has
been forced to invest every ounce of political capital on elections
that, in Escobar’s words, may result in the verdict: “First we vote,
then we kick you out.”
Meanwhile, the world watches as armed-to-the-teeth U.S. troops stand
on street corners, handing out election literature in someone else’s
country, after having flattened Fallujah, a city roughly the size
of Newark, New Jersey. Imagine if machinegun-toting Germans had performed
similar electoral duties in occupied France, in 1942. Would any civilized
observer have considered such a process legitimate? Yet Bush bets
that his atrocity will be seen as a light unto the nations – an amazing
measure of the chasm that separates the Pirates from civilization.
Aijaz Ahmad, in a piece for the political journal Frontline, published
by The Hindu of India, describes an American mindset that
is, in a word, savage:
”The mentality that the Americans brought into
their attack on the people of Falluja was well indicated by the marine
commanders who said on record that Falluja was a ‘house of Satan’ and
those other commanders who told their soldiers to ‘shoot everything
that moves and everything that does not move’; to fire ‘two bullets
in every body’; and to spray every home with machine-gun and tank
fire before entering them.”
Yet, for all the blood shed by both Iraqis and Americans, the U.S.
has suffered a huge net loss in world public opinion, and in the
resources that it has sought to steal. The Americans are now more
ill-positioned than two years ago, said Mr. Ahmad:
”By contrast, none of the gains the U.S. had sought
in Iraq and in the region as a whole has been realized, almost two
years after Baghdad fell, seemingly so easily: not the capturing
of the Iraqi oil, not the ability to use Iraq as the main military
base in the region so as to begin an orderly withdrawal from Saudi
Arabia, not the dream of using Iraq as a base for launching attacks
against Syria, Iran, Lebanon or whatever. A demonstration of the
invincibility of American power has come together with the overwhelming
evidence of the limits of American power of the ground. We can now
witness an imperial overreach even before they have reached very
far.”
The Black Commentator said much the same thing on March 20, 2003,
as Shock and Awe broke over Iraq. “War is the great and terrible engine of history,” we wrote. “Bush
and his Pirates hope to employ that engine to harness Time and cheat
the laws of political economy, to leapfrog over the contradictions
of their parasitical existence into a new epoch of their own imagining.
Instead, they have lunged into the abyss, from which no one will
extricate them, for they will be hated much more than feared.
“In attempting to break humanity's will to resist, the Bush
pirates have reached too
far.”
Handmaiden to evil
George Bush and his handmaiden, Condoleezza Rice, speak a strange
language that is understood only by the denizens of the American
bubble. It is a language of aggression, pure and simple – an American
Manifest Destiny that threatens the sovereignty of every other nation
on the planet, but pretends to be a liberating force. Bush also delivered
an implicit threat to those Americans who resist involvement in his
savage crusade: “We are led, by events and common sense, to one conclusion:
The survival of liberty in our land increasingly depends on the success
of liberty in other lands,” said Bush in his inaugural
address. “The
best hope for peace in our world is the expansion of freedom in all
the world.” It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that the Bush
men (and woman) are prepared to declare domestic opponents of his
imperial policies to be threats to internal American liberties.
Printer friendly
Bush and Rice "We have lit a fire" cartoon.
In her confirmation hearings, Condoleezza Rice showed herself to
be as bellicose as her master. In addition to Syria and Iran, writes
Patrick Sale, of the Lebanon-based Daily
Star, Rice placed
Muslims in general in the cross-hairs. “America
and the free world," she declared, "are once again engaged
in a long-term struggle against an ideology of hatred and tyranny
and terror and hopelessness. And we must confront these challenges
..."
Confrontation, everywhere, including in
the south of our own hemisphere. Rice made a special effort to
signal aggressive
U.S. intentions against Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez for his “close
association” with Fidel Castro. Democratic
Connecticut Senator Christopher Dodd reminded Rice that Luiz
Inacio Lula de Silva, President of the southern colossus, Brazil,
is also on good terms with Castro. He might have also told her
that Brazil and other Latin American nations are working furiously
to sever their dependency on strangulating U.S. terms of trade,
most notably by concluding massive new deals with China; that Venezuela,
Brazil, Cuba and Uruguay may soon launch a cooperative news
service, so that CNN and other American agencies will no longer
pollute their national dialogues; that Brazil, South Africa and
India are busily establishing strategic alliances designed to circumvent
the North – especially the United States; that India, China and
Russia are struggling to create new poles of power in the world,
circles of influence in which the U.S. would be absent.
A bad poker hand
The U.S. invasion and ongoing torture of Iraq put the planet on
notice that Washington is a danger to global stability. Not just
progressives, but the conservative elites of Europe and Asia, were
shocked and awed in ways that the insular Americans did not contemplate.
The Financial
Times, a spokes-publication for Britain’s elite,
warns: “Central banks are shifting reserves away from the US and
towards the eurozone in a move that looks set to deepen the Bush
administration's difficulties in financing its ballooning current
account deficit.” These financial managers are careful to move away
from the dollar incrementally, so as not to plunge the global system
into panic – but the direction is inexorably away from the U.S. currency.
As a nation, we are being set up for a deep fall, but the fault lies
with the Bush men (and woman), who are playing a kind of poker with
the rest of the planet – one in which the only cards in their hands
are military.
The military fiasco in Iraq has shown that these are weak cards,
yet the only response from the Bush Pirates is to threaten further
aggression in Iran, Syria, Venezuela, and Cuba. Ironically, the corporate
class that Bush serves is the least “patriotic” of all, ready and
eager to abandon the homeland to its economic fate in favor of greener
pastures in Asia. Bernie Sanders, the socialist congressman from
Vermont, exposed these rich traitors for what they are, in a recent
issue of In
These Times:
“Amazingly, while the U.S. middle
class declines, corporate America is helping make China the economic
superpower of the 21st century. Not only is China rapidly becoming
the manufacturing center of the world, it is quickly becoming
the information technology hub as well. Andy Grove, the founder
of Intel, predicted last year that the United States will lose
the bulk of its information technology jobs to China and India
over the next decade. These are some of the best-paying jobs
available.
“And John Chambers, the CEO of Cisco, is typical
of many corporate leaders when he said: ‘China will become the IT
center of the world, and we can have a healthy discussion about whether
that’s in 2020 or 2040. What we’re trying to do is outline an entire
strategy of becoming a Chinese company.’”
The Bush men (and woman) loot the American treasury and threaten
world order in the service of corporations that have already abandoned
their U.S. nationality, and now seek to destroy the sovereignty of
all other nations. They have initiated a war against…everyone.
Civility cannot long exist where savages rule. In questioning the
perennial prevaricator Condoleezza Rice, Minnesota Senator Mark Dayton
found it impossible to keep up the pretensions of the upper chamber. "I
don't like impugning anyone's integrity, but I really don't like
being lied to," Dayton
said. "Repeatedly, flagrantly,
intentionally."
The entire planet is rejecting blatant American lies and aggression,
and actively conspiring to undermine United States military, economic
and political domination. This aggression now has a new face – that
of a Black woman. We are saddened at the historical irony, but so
be it. Evil comes in all colors.
|