|
|
|
“It's insulting that none of us who have
been responsible for most registration and turnout are at the
table determining priorities.” – Rev.
Jesse Jackson, Sr., Rainbow/PUSH Coalition
“There is something
wrong when groups who have closed the gap on enfranchisement
with our track record
and our history of protecting the vote are not getting funding.” – Melanie
L. Campbell, Executive Director, National Coalition on Black
Civic Participation (NCBCP)
“There appears to be a dedicated campaign
by the party leadership, the Kerry campaign and now ancillary
funding organizations to
build some political distance between themselves and key traditional
leaders of the party base.” – Political scientist Ron Walters,
board member, NCBCP
Whatever happens on November 2, traditional
African American leadership faces a crisis of historic proportions,
a day of reckoning that has been approaching for more than three
decades. Having virtually shut down the activist wing of the
Civil Rights/Black Power Movement in favor of electoral and broker
politics at the dawn of the Seventies, Black leadership now finds
itself blackballed from the $200 million-plus soft money
Democratic campaign feast. Essentially, they have been sidelined
from the only mass action game they chose to play.
Instead, 527 outfits jump-started by
super-rich, Bush-averse benefactors like George
Soros (net worth: $8 billion) dominate the street action
in Black precincts throughout the 17 campaign “battleground” states.
Paying $8 to $12 an hour for door-to-door canvassers, the New
Jack 527s have supplanted (usurped might be a better word) the
electoral functions previously performed by mainstream Black
organizations such as the 84-member National Coalition on Black
Civic Participation (NCBCP),
chaired by Patricia A. Ford. “The people
who are doing the work are the community – only they are working for
527s,” said Ford, the former executive vice president of Service
Employees International Union (SEIU).
With more than $80 million in funding, the Soros-backed voter
mobilization 527 America Coming Together (ACT)
has assumed leadership of the African American electoral army.
The de facto commander is ACT CEO Steve Rosenthal, former
AFL-CIO Political Director.
On the mass communications front, political messages are crafted
and paid for through the Media
Fund, which has raised and spent about $28 million dollars
as of October 10. The brainchild of former top Clinton aid Harold
Ickes, the Media Fund is currently in the middle of a $5 million
advertising campaign centered on Black-oriented radio. The fund’s
president, Erik Smith, is a former aid to Missouri Democratic Congressman
Richard Gephardt. Although selected African American individuals,
consultants and public relations and media firms have been recruited
to the ACT and Media Fund voter mobilization and media projects,
the white folks are firmly in charge of the methodology and the
message.
Patricia Ford’s NCBCP,
with a 28-year history of electoral organizing including Operation
Big Vote
and Black Youth Vote, was left out in the cold. Its modest goal
to raise $8 million dollars for “voter protection” – ensuring
that citizens who show up at the polls are allowed to cast their
ballots – now seems beyond reach and out of time. As a result,
said Ford, “the election is in peril.”
Net Loss of Black Votes Possible
Despite phenomenal numbers of new Black
registrants (see , “Black
Voter Registration Skyrocketing,” September
30), a repeat of the Republicans’ mass Black vote theft of
2000 could result in a net loss at the polls. “What we are trying to do in
these last days is to get enough money to have poll watchers
on the ground,” said Ford. “Based on our intelligence nobody
has a significant effort to protect that right on the ground.” In
the last presidential election, 1.2 to 1.3 million Black votes
were lost to intimidation, fraud and purges of the rolls. Although
the NCBCP operates a hotline (1-866-OUR-VOTE) capable of fielding
200,000 calls simultaneously, and supportive legal groups plan
to field tens of thousands of lawyers to respond to voter complaints, “nobody
is protecting that voter at the polling place,” warned Ford. “The
legal effort is after the fact. The election will have come and
gone, and we will still be in the same place as after the 2000
election.”
“We need to train people on what to look out for, and where to
look,” she continued. “We could have trained seniors,” but now
there is very little time left.
Meanwhile, the GOP will field thousands of
volunteer disrupters in Black and Brown precincts who have been
trained to “hold people
to the letter of the law” – a code for aggressive voter intimidation. Ohio and
other Republican-controlled states promise to follow Florida’s
2000 lead in 2004. “Lawyers are fine, but when a person goes to
the polling place and gets turned away, someone needs to be right
there to assist them,” said Ford. “As it stands now, people are
relying on that person to call the Hotline, instead of just going
home.”
Experience tells us that untold thousands
will simply leave in disgust.
is
aware of a letter sent to moneyman George Soros and his richest
friends by Ms. Ford and three other co-chairs of the umbrella
group, Unity ’04 – Urban
League President Marc Morial, Dorothy Height, of the National
Council of Negro Women, and University of Maryland political
scientist Ron Walters – in which they asked only that a funded
division of labor be arranged, so that traditional Black organizations
might concentrate on thwarting the theft of Black votes “on the
ground,” in Ford’s words. To date, there has been no substantial
response from the top
five pro-Democrat 527s. Said one Black voter mobilization
official: “They appear to take their cues from [Steve] Rosenthal
and [Harold] Ickes.”
Insults from the DNC
Whoever is sending the signals, hostility
to traditional Black leadership is broadcasting at full power
from the Democratic National Committee – ruled, like the Kerry
campaign, by the corporate-backed Democratic Leadership Council
(DLC).
By law, a “firewall” must exist between the 527s and the Democratic
National Committee’s campaign operations. But of course, no wall
can separate persons of like political minds. Black Democratic
National Committeeman Ben
Johnson felt confident enough in his slavish role to insultingly
dismiss Black leadership’s grievances. Newhouse News
Service recorded Johnson’s outburst in late September:
"Those complaints are coming from old-line folks who
make money off controversy," said Deputy Democratic National
Chairman Ben Johnson, who is active in the black voter registration
efforts. The key to winning in 2004 will be turnout, not registration,
Johnson said, although the party is not neglecting registration.
"There's a change in the way everything is being done," Johnson
said. "This is a new day, and we have a number of hip-hop
artists involved in voter registration."
Maybe money is not flowing
to old-line groups "like
they'd like it to be flowing," Johnson said, "but people
in neighborhoods across the country recognize the importance
of registration, and they are not waiting for somebody to give
them a dime to register."
Pat Ford finds Johnson’s comments “baffling,” since
the NCBCP’s current concerns revolve around Black voter protection
at the polls, not registration. And effective turnout
requires voter protection.
When asked on October
13 to comment on his deputy’s remarks, DNC Chairman Terry McAuliffe said
he was “unaware” of the Johnson’s statements. Florida Black
Congresswoman Corrine Brown, preparing to join Representatives
Alcee Hastings and Kendrick Meek on a four-day “Our Vote, Our
Future” bus tour of the state, said: “We’ve got to make sure
that everyone feels involved in this process. Clearly, there
has been some miscommunication.”
In truth, Johnson’s outburst was simply
an expression of his utter contempt for mainstream African
American organizations, a deep animosity that was nurtured
and rewarded during his eight years as a Black gatekeeper at
Bill Clinton’s White House. According to Johnson’s official
Democratic Party profile, he served as “point
person for promoting the President's race relations goals.” Now, in
2004, Clinton’s crowd is getting their wish: Traditional Black
leadership has been defunded, cut out of the campaign.
No, Clinton was not the first Black president. But he was the
first DLC president. John Kerry hopes to become the second, and
we have no choice but to help him.
The DLC, formed in the mid-1980s to suppress
the voices of Blacks and labor in the party – and as a direct reaction to the hugely
successful Black voter registration drives that accompanied Rev.
Jesse Jackson’s presidential campaigns – is determined to keep
organized Black America at arms length, and broke. Should Kerry
win, traditional Black leadership will be declared irrelevant.
As Freedom Rider columnist Margaret Kimberley wrote on September
30: “The Democratic National Committee and the Democratic
Leadership Council will crow that their dubious strategies were
in fact brilliant. Their claims should not go unchallenged.”
Letters of Indignation
Ron Walters, a co-chair of Unity ’04, brooked no insults from
Harold Ickes’ Media Fund, whose President, Erik Smith, had the
temerity to request “a quote we can use from you for our press
materials.” Walters fired back a letter to Media Fund founder
Harold Ickes. The NNPA’s Hazel Trice Edney, in an excellent piece
of journalism, was the first to reveal the text of
the letter:
"Since the 1970s the National Coalition
for Black Civic Participation has operated Operation Big
Vote and in recent
years Black Youth Vote and in this election cycle, the Unity
04 Campaign has been established, staffed and has attempted
to raise funds for its activities with meager success. So,
we are now to understand that The Media Fund, an entity that
is completely unknown in the Black community, but which contains
some Black PR firms, has a plan for Black messaging and the
resources to enact it."
"But it is a plan that has been drafted
outside of our community, that is to say, without the collective
sign-off
of any significant collection of Black leaders. Therefore,
why should we accept it and cooperate with it? This is an arrogant
and divisive usurpation of power and it is destructive of our
efforts that began most recently in the Civil Rights movement,
where the efforts of Blacks to provide their own leadership
in the act of political participation was understood to be
the source of their power in the policy system as well."
Dr. Walter’s letter is an eloquent and historically important
piece of Black political literature, requiring further quotation.
He challenged the Media Fund’s pretensions of connectedness to
Black America – as if authenticity can be purchased in the PR
and media marketplace.
“…I am not aware of the reputations of
the firms that you cite that have done the content work,
with the exception of Cornell
Belcher. In fact, it is a new development that we have
many such public relations firms in the Black community these
days, but I am not at all convinced that some have any other
interests at stake than the maintenance of the viability of
their operations. This is another way of saying that simply
because there are Black PR firms involved, is no assurance
that they are connected with the mainstream direction of the
Black community….
“The entry into the field of this new initiative to be managed
by The Media Fund is just another blow to the infrastructure
that was being developed by these organizations in coalition,
but like the activity of America Coming Together, amounts to
yet another slight to our community as they utilize hundreds
of millions of dollars at their disposal to operationalize
their own view of what is important for us to do with our political
participation. Thus, there is a special sensitivity that naturally
arises when another such effort emerges outside of the mainstream
of the black community and seeks to play a role in organizing
the black vote, this time by controlling the messaging process….
“The control of such resources
outside of the black community is not consistent with fraternal
relations, it
is not consistent with a forward-looking and positive relationship
as blacks become an ever larger share of the Democratic Party
base, and it is not consistent with progressive politics as a
definition of democratic practice. To call it what it is, the
control of these resources is an extension of a colonial relationship
that we have attributed to Republicans, but which Democrats have
all too often, of late, been tempted to operationalize.”
But of course, the DLC faction of the party
does not want Blacks to become “an ever larger share” of the base – yet it cannot
win without near-total Black support. Therefore, they attempt
to create the illusion of an “alternative” Black infrastructure,
while starving and shunning the real thing – very much as the
GOP does with its appointed Black cadre. That’s why Black DNC
operative Ben Johnson’s contemptuous remarks about “old line” Black
organizations sound damn near Republican. He’s playing Condoleezza
to Kerry. A new crowd of white-sanctioned Blacks is to be contracted.
As Ron Walters puts it, “they have tried to substitute people
with Palm Pilots and Blackberries for the success we had over
the years."
Walters’ letter to Ickes concludes: “Leadership
matters and in the final analysis, to let the control of the
black vote drift
into the hands of forces outside of the black community is a
dangerous situation for John Kerry, but fundamentally for the
black community itself.”
Noting that Black organizations have traditionally
fielded unpaid election volunteers, NCBCP’s Pat Ford wonders what kind of expectations
the 527s will leave in their wake after they fold their tents
in the Black community on November 2. “Now that everybody’s getting
paid, I’m not sure that’s healthy. How will people respond when
there’s no money?”
The Crisis is Now
Traditional African American leadership is
reaping the shriveled fruits of the narrow path it strode down
three decades ago, when
the “movement” was demobilized in favor of brokered politics
and periodic electioneering. Until now, Blacks were invited
to the two- and four-year Democratic electoral party,
but not to the permanent power party. Under the new regime,
traditional Black organizations have been disinvited from the
electoral party, as well. The goal is clear: The DLC means to
prevent Black groups from taking credit for a massive African
American voter turnout against Bush. By sidelining these organizations
during the campaign, the DLC hopes to cripple their capacity
to mobilize constituencies between elections. Since electoral
and broker politics has been so central to mainstream Black organizations
for the past 30-plus years, the game will, essentially, be over.
There is no choice for traditional Black groups but to fight their
way out of this terminal impasse. The solution has nothing to
do with a realignment of party loyalties – African Americans
are hugely invested in the Democratic Party. Virtually all of
nearly 10,000 Black elected officials are Democrats. It is African
American community organizational structures that are in crisis – the
fight over election funding simply serves to dramatize a long
curve of decline that began when strategies of mass mobilization
were, in effect, placed in hibernation. Black leadership must
remake itself, and stir the people awake.
They must join the digital age. Three years ago, when was
in the planning stages, we were shocked to discover the generally
abysmal level of Internet use among traditional Black organizations.
Not just poor Blacks, but the groups that claimed to speak to
and for the masses, were stuck on the far side of the digital
divide. It was clear to us then that this cyber deficit was the
result of Black leadership placing a low priority on mass mobilization
of even their wired, middle class constituents. They were content
in their dependence on outside sources of funding.
Howard Dean’s campaign proved that the Internet
is a uniquely effective tool for both funding and mobilization.
(See “How
the Internet Invented Howard Dean.”) Traditional Black leadership
can reinvent itself as a truly independent force, but only if
it combines the broadest outreach with real programs of mobilization – the
only route to solvency, and to regaining the grudging respect
of Black people’s adversaries.
As it stands now, we have once again been Rodney Dangerfielded.
|
|
|
|
|
|